William,
Could it be convened on Monday?
Kepa
William J. Kammerer wrote:
> Due to the amount of interest that the topic of EDI IDs and routing has
> generated, there is a possibility that more time for a Face-to-Face
> discussion at the Seattle X12 Trimester meeting will be needed.
>
> We ha
Let me add something here...
It would be trivial to create a database in which you could take the
NAIC or DUNS number from the ISA and look up the electronic route to
that entity, except... 1) who would create or maintain such a large
database? 2) a centralized database could pose a security
Due to the amount of interest that the topic of EDI IDs and routing has
generated, there is a possibility that more time for a Face-to-Face
discussion at the Seattle X12 Trimester meeting will be needed.
We have tentatively scheduled discussions to occur in the X12N/TG3/WG2
Transaction Coord. & M
Ronald Bowron wrote:
Having worked in several clearinghouse environments, I can
tell you that the Sender/Receiver ID in the ISA was not used
much and usually not relied upon for Batch processing, which
is how clearinghouses typically do business. Because users
generally logged int
"...would the current ISA ID values be used to do a lookup in the DNS
table by the VAN/CH to get the proper routing, or will the entire route
be in the ISA?" Only the entity ID (NAIC, DUNS, etc.) would be in the
ISA receiver field. We are advocating no changes to the existing ASC
X12 standards.
