Well, the sad thing is that there has been so many changes that my
attempts to merge my existing distribution and the cvs checkout of today
produced much too many differences, most of which are due to
re-indenting... one file had 121 differences...
I think I can only give up.
As far as I under
Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It didn't come out quite right. It looks like you took your modified
> version, checked out a new copy from CVS, and did a file system diff
> between the two. This makes your changes impossible to decipher, as
> it's impossible to separate the regress
It didn't come out quite right. It looks like you took your modified
version, checked out a new copy from CVS, and did a file system diff
between the two. This makes your changes impossible to decipher, as
it's impossible to separate the regressions in the diff from any
forward progress (CVS has
ww.mail-archive.com/rpc-dev%40xml.apache.org/
http://www.mail-archive.com/rpc-user%40xml.apache.org/
Hannes
>
>
>thanks,
>Paul Oehler
>- Original Message -
>From: "John Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECT
No, I haven't,
I actually wanted to register to rpc-dev but just clicked the wrong
link, ah well... The diff to a cvs checkout of an hour ago is now in the
same directory:
http://www.activemath.org/~ilo/revisions/xmlrpc/
Please note that it's the first time I used diff, so I may made it
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Libbrecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 10:41 PM
Subject: Re: Patch suggestions
> John,
>
> There's one thing that I am wondering about.
> In the description of the M
John,
There's one thing that I am wondering about.
In the description of the MinML project, you seem to say that your major
interest in writing MinML was XML-RPC, right ?
Why not then write a dedicated parser for XML-RPC ??
The specification of Dave Winer is known to be frozen so there is no
d
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Oehler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 8:15 PM
Subject: Re: Patch suggestions
> Speaking of "the archives" for this list and rpc-dev, where are they? Are
> these messa
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 3:07 PM
Subject: Re: Patch suggestions
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Paul Libbrecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Libbrecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 12:41 PM
Subject: Patch suggestions
[snip]
> -> we wanted to have the ability to exchange UTF-8 encoded messages so
> the XMLWriter
Hey Paul, did all of this get integrated? If not, would you send a
unidiff which illustrates what changes are still missing?
Thanks, Dan
Paul Libbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi there,
>
>
> Since a while happy users of the Helma XML-RPC library we have made a
> few patches.
>
> Two th
"Stuart Roll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hannes -
>
> Of course that sets a static variable so you can only have one kind of
> encoding at a time per JVM. That should be okay for most, I would think,
> but it could be more flexible.
Stuart, I totally agree. Patches anyone?
You will really have to debug I fear.
In the output you print I didn't see any header, was there really non ??
That looks real weird !
Paul
On Mercredi, mars 6, 2002, at 04:06 , Lin, Yaxiong wrote:
>
> Paul:
>
> The garbled text I attached was printed to my xmlrpc WebServer console
> running o
d to do to get more debugging info on the client side to see
what got sent out of client?
Thanks.
- Yaxiong
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Libbrecht [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 8:59 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Patch
A zip is now also available under
http://www.activemath.org/~ilo/revisions/xmlrpc/
I am not too sure if this can influence the garbled text which seems to
come from the header. Did you try debugging things so as to see when
this bit has come (before or after header end ?). As of http r
Kurt,
Good, I think the encoding-specification through setEncoding should
still work, though I did not test if and, of course, at the possible
risk that your string contains non-encodable characters.
If the encoding has been specificied with XmlRpc.setEncoding then it
should work. Well... it
c.setEncoding("UTF8");
Hannes
>
>
>Thanks!
>Kurt
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Paul Libbrecht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 7:41 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Patch suggestions
>
>
>
>Hi there,
>
>
the option of specifying
>the encoding.
>
You have that option already, just call
XmlRpc.setEncoding("UTF8");
Hannes
>
>
>Thanks!
>Kurt
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Paul Libbrecht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 7
March 06, 2002 8:25 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Patch suggestions
>
> Paul,
>
> This is great! We have the need to send UTF-8 encoded strings
> to an application and feel that SOAP is a little overkill for
> what we are trying to do. Hopefully this ca
-Original Message-
From: Paul Libbrecht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 7:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Patch suggestions
Hi there,
Since a while happy users of the Helma XML-RPC library we have made a
few patches.
Two things that seem important
Hi there,
Since a while happy users of the Helma XML-RPC library we have made a
few patches.
Two things that seem important for everyone and one that was important
only for us:
-> we wanted to have the ability to exchange UTF-8 encoded messages so
the XMLWriter has been enriched and the Min
21 matches
Mail list logo
