On May 14, 2009, at 11:41 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
I haven't a clue what the better answer is.
But the explicit enumeration is likely to break
again and again and again. I know my habits well ;-)
I perhaps should mention the original reason for
explicit enumeration of files.
When
2009/5/14 Jeff Johnson n3...@mac.com
Thanks for doing.
But somehow there has to be a better way to
include files (and sub-trees) in EXTRA_DIST without
explicitly enumerating each and every file.
E.g. liveconnect is unused by rpmjs, and is highly unlikely
to ever be used. Meanwhile the
Thanks for doing.
But somehow there has to be a better way to
include files (and sub-trees) in EXTRA_DIST without
explicitly enumerating each and every file.
E.g. liveconnect is unused by rpmjs, and is highly unlikely
to ever be used. Meanwhile the cost of customizing
imported subtrees is
On May 14, 2009, at 11:53 AM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
btw. I noticed rpm building rpmkey rpmxar by default now for
some reason? (didn't happen with HEAD)
How does one disable the build of these if headers missing?
One doesn't disable rpmkey or rpmxar or luac/luav or js or Berkeley
DB
2009/5/14 Jeff Johnson n3...@mac.com
On May 14, 2009, at 11:53 AM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
btw. I noticed rpm building rpmkey rpmxar by default now for
some reason? (didn't happen with HEAD)
How does one disable the build of these if headers missing?
One doesn't disable rpmkey or
On May 14, 2009, at 12:20 PM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
Well, bloat wasn't really the issue, but rather build breakages.
If mandatory then configure should check for the headers.
Well there are two ways to fix that, enable or disable:
1) add the ususal #ifdef WITH_KEYUTILS
2)
Thank you!
Meanwhile, you have the same code in both the TRUE and the FALSE
branches of an if ... then ... else ... clause afaict.
That works, but perhaps there is simpler?
;-)
73 de Jeff
On May 14, 2009, at 3:02 PM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
RPM Package Manager, CVS Repository
2009/5/14 Jeff Johnson n3...@mac.com
Thank you!
Meanwhile, you have the same code in both the TRUE and the FALSE
branches of an if ... then ... else ... clause afaict.
That works, but perhaps there is simpler?
;-)
What? You expect me to think for myself as well now?!?! ;p
Trying to
On May 14, 2009, at 3:21 PM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
Trying to focus on too many things at once while getting rpm-5_2
branch working..
Fixed :)
working I already know (modulo delta imprecisions and brain farts).
building for all possible AutoFu is a slightly different matter.
Thanks!