On Wednesday 02 February 2011 00:18:51 Jeff Johnson wrote:
> On Feb 1, 2011, at 11:26 AM, Silvan Calarco wrote:
> >> And I should have a OpenMAMBA VM setup in the next couple of days.
> >
> > Fine! I suggest you to install the livecd or livedvd development
> > snapshot.
>
> FYI: both the livecd/l
On Feb 1, 2011, at 11:26 AM, Silvan Calarco wrote:
>
>> And I should have a OpenMAMBA VM setup in the next couple of days.
>
> Fine! I suggest you to install the livecd or livedvd development snapshot.
>
FYI: both the livecd/livedvd are failing to install (this is Snow
Leopard VMFusion).
Eac
On Feb 1, 2011, at 2:13 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
> Just FYI: The eventual "forward" looking solution @rpm5.org is gonna
> be to just scrap rpmtsOrder() and replace with an incremental topological
> sort done as a side effect of adding an install/erase package to a
> transaction, and with LOOP de
On Feb 1, 2011, at 1:06 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
> I think you're crazy attempting prioritized package ordering. ;-)
>
Your conception of "priority" isn't the right design imho. For starters,
there's all sorts of legacy compatibility issues buried here:
+static const evrFlags orderPriorit
On Feb 1, 2011, at 12:46 PM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
> I've tried to make a first attempt at resolving dependency loops using
> the specific dependency type as hint for ordering.
>
> The patch attached will try attempt resolving the loops by removing
> one kind of dependency type (based on wha
I've tried to make a first attempt at resolving dependency loops using
the specific dependency type as hint for ordering.
The patch attached will try attempt resolving the loops by removing
one kind of dependency type (based on what seems likely to be the
most important kind of dependency wrt. ord
On Feb 1, 2011, at 11:26 AM, Silvan Calarco wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 February 2011 16:48:20 Jeff Johnson wrote:
>>> Resolved (and stupid me)!
>>> While preparing the list of rpm commands to send you I noticed that
>>> between each rpm invocation the script was removing the db cache:
>>>
>>> rm /va
On Tuesday 01 February 2011 16:48:20 Jeff Johnson wrote:
> > Resolved (and stupid me)!
> > While preparing the list of rpm commands to send you I noticed that
> > between each rpm invocation the script was removing the db cache:
> >
> > rm /var/makedist/root.tmp/var/lib/rpm/__db.00* -f
>
> Eeek!
On Feb 1, 2011, at 10:38 AM, Silvan Calarco wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 February 2011 16:14:39 Silvan Calarco wrote:
>> meanwhile I'll send you the
>> rpm commands to reproduce what I do.
>
> Resolved (and stupid me)!
> While preparing the list of rpm commands to send you I noticed that between
> ea
On Tuesday 01 February 2011 16:14:39 Silvan Calarco wrote:
> meanwhile I'll send you the
> rpm commands to reproduce what I do.
Resolved (and stupid me)!
While preparing the list of rpm commands to send you I noticed that between
each rpm invocation the script was removing the db cache:
rm /var/
On Feb 1, 2011, at 10:14 AM, Silvan Calarco wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 February 2011 15:48:46 Jeff Johnson wrote:
$ sudo rpm -r /var/makedist/root.tmp -i
/var/ftp/pub/openmamba/devel/RPMS.arm/lxde-icon-theme-0.0.1-3mamba.arm.r
pm
>>
>> Ah arm, not i586, never mind the previous questio
On Tuesday 01 February 2011 15:48:46 Jeff Johnson wrote:
> >> $ sudo rpm -r /var/makedist/root.tmp -i
> >> /var/ftp/pub/openmamba/devel/RPMS.arm/lxde-icon-theme-0.0.1-3mamba.arm.r
> >> pm
>
> Ah arm, not i586, never mind the previous question.
>
> Do you have an openmamba install dvd for arm some
>>
>> $ sudo rpm -r /var/makedist/root.tmp -i
>> /var/ftp/pub/openmamba/devel/RPMS.arm/lxde-icon-theme-0.0.1-3mamba.arm.rpm
Ah arm, not i586, never mind the previous question.
Do you have an openmamba install dvd for arm somewhere?
I just succeeded (on Snow Leopard with qemu-0.13.0) in
being
On Feb 1, 2011, at 8:14 AM, Silvan Calarco wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 January 2011 03:40:07 Jeff Johnson wrote:
>> 260:lxde-icon-theme
>>> ### [ 87%] rpm: header.c:1044:
>>> headerLoad: Assertion `(rpmint32_t)rdl >= 0' failed.
>>
>> This is the code f
On Wednesday 19 January 2011 03:40:07 Jeff Johnson wrote:
> 260:lxde-icon-theme
> > ### [ 87%] rpm: header.c:1044:
> > headerLoad: Assertion `(rpmint32_t)rdl >= 0' failed.
>
> This is the code from rpmdb/header.c:
>
> ...
> rpmuint32_
15 matches
Mail list logo
