On Apr 11, 2011, at 3:23 AM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
> ps: if you still don't get it, it should be fairly easy grasping just by
> looking
> at the packages in cooker which has devel() dependencies, and see how
> these dependencies gets automatically pulled in from other packages
> providing de
On Apr 11, 2011, at 3:13 AM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
>>
>> If not, then you didn't understand what Stefan wanted.
I fully understand what Stegfan asked for -- what he "wants" isn't/wasn't
privy to me.
And there is an implementation in place for 5 years that
automatically creates the necessar
On Apr 11, 2011, at 3:11 AM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
>>
> you mean dependency on 'string in DT_SONAME' rather than
> devel('string in DT_SONAME')? Because it's *NOT* a dependency
> on the the SONAME itself!
The state what the dependency is on.
I see
readlink(2)
as the essential chang
ps: if you still don't get it, it should be fairly easy grasping just by looking
at the packages in cooker which has devel() dependencies, and see how
these dependencies gets automatically pulled in from other packages
providing devel() when installng a -devel package...
ps: Excuse my aggitation,
lsen
>>> Date: 2011/4/11
>>> Subject: Re: [CVS] RPM: rpm/ CHANGES rpm/lib/ librpm.vers rpmds.c
>>> rpmds.h rpmfc.c
>>> To: rpm-devel@rpm5.org
>>>
>>>
>>> 2011/4/11 Jeff Johnson :
>>>> I knew I'd seen this symlink patch befo
2011/4/11 Jeff Johnson :
>
> On Apr 11, 2011, at 12:58 AM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
>
>> 2011/4/11 Per Øyvind Karlsen :
>>> wrong sender.. fgrf
>>>
>>> -- Forwarded message --
>>> From: Per Øyvind Karlsen
>>> Date
On Apr 11, 2011, at 12:58 AM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
> 2011/4/11 Per Øyvind Karlsen :
>> wrong sender.. fgrf
>>
>> -- Forwarded message --
>> From: Per Øyvind Karlsen
>> Date: 2011/4/11
>> Subject: Re: [CVS] RPM: rpm/ CHANGES rpm/lib/
On Apr 11, 2011, at 12:29 AM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
> wrong sender.. fgrf
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Per Øyvind Karlsen
> Date: 2011/4/11
> Subject: Re: [CVS] RPM: rpm/ CHANGES rpm/lib/ librpm.vers rpmds.c
> rpmds.h rpmfc.c
> To: rpm-devel
2011/4/11 Per Øyvind Karlsen :
> wrong sender.. fgrf
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Per Øyvind Karlsen
> Date: 2011/4/11
> Subject: Re: [CVS] RPM: rpm/ CHANGES rpm/lib/ librpm.vers rpmds.c
> rpmds.h rpmfc.c
> To: rpm-devel@rpm5.org
>
>
> 2011/
wrong sender.. fgrf
-- Forwarded message --
From: Per Øyvind Karlsen
Date: 2011/4/11
Subject: Re: [CVS] RPM: rpm/ CHANGES rpm/lib/ librpm.vers rpmds.c
rpmds.h rpmfc.c
To: rpm-devel@rpm5.org
2011/4/11 Jeff Johnson :
> I knew I'd seen this symlink patch before:
>
>
I knew I'd seen this symlink patch before:
https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/pipermail/rpm-devel/2006-April/001037.html
I did not like the patch the first time, and I don't like it 5 years later.
I will rework the issue under #if RPM_VENDOR_MANDRIVA across the board.
Note that the rule (alre
11 matches
Mail list logo
