(around 100
RPM tags) to avoid the collision with RPM tag numbers, that can possibly
will be added to rpm.org in the future.
--
With best regards,
Vladimir D. Seleznev
___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman
re copied into
> > a uint32 (which needs to be swabbed on big endian platforms).
> >
> > 3) the tagno is assigned by then masking on the 0x4000 arbitrary tag
> > identifier onto the least significant 30 bits of the uint32.
Thank you for the suggestion, I think
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 09:58:58AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 02/28/2018 12:03 AM, Vladimir D. Seleznev wrote:
> > Hello, rpm-maint@!
> >
> > We in ALT Linux Team implemented some new RPM tags for our RPM package
> > header and RPM database. Since RPM tags are n
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 11:31:17AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 03/06/2018 06:29 PM, Vladimir D. Seleznev wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 05:54:27AM -0500, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> >>> You might try the convention of assigning tags in the 1Gb space from
> >>>
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 05:03:54PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 03/07/2018 03:48 PM, Vladimir D. Seleznev wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 09:58:58AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> >> On 02/28/2018 12:03 AM, Vladimir D. Seleznev wrote:
> >>> Hello, rpm-maint
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 01:45:31PM +0100, Florian Festi wrote:
> On 03/12/2018 10:04 PM, vsele...@altlinux.org wrote:
> > From: "Vladimir D. Seleznev"
> >
> > This tag represents binary package build characteristic: if two binary
> > packages have equal
We couldn't think of better tag name (you can propose a better name).
--
With best regards,
Vladimir D. Seleznev
___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 09:44:41PM +0300, Ivan Zakharyaschev wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, Vladimir D. Seleznev wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 10:20:58AM -0400, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
> >> I'd also suggest a more specific name than I
resurrections needed, but the basic functionality
> to chain is likely still intact in rpm even if lightly used).
--
With best regards,
Vladimir D. Seleznev
___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Hello, rpm-maint@!
There are RFC patches which implement RPMTAG_IDENTITY calculation.
The main idea is that RPMTAG_IDENTITY contains a hash of as many as possible,
ideally all RPMTAGs, with exception of that that principally cannot be
reproducible and that we don't want to make it reproducible. A
This commit introduces calculateIdentity function. The function
calculates identity as a hash of significant package tags, and writes it
to the package header. Tag is significant unless it is insignificant.
Insignificant tags are those tags that are not relevant to result of
package build, e.g. tha
---
build/pack.c | 7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/build/pack.c b/build/pack.c
index dc5f84c..7ec0eda 100644
--- a/build/pack.c
+++ b/build/pack.c
@@ -452,6 +452,13 @@ static rpmRC writeRPM(Package pkg, unsigned char ** pkgidp,
headerPutString(pkg->header, RPMTAG_C
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 03:07:21PM -0400, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
>
> > On Mar 29, 2018, at 12:55 PM, Vladimir D. Seleznev
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hello, rpm-maint@!
> >
> > There are RFC patches which implement RPMTAG_IDENTITY calculation.
> >
>
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 07:50:09AM +0300, Alexey Tourbin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 7:55 PM, Vladimir D. Seleznev
> wrote:
> > Hello, rpm-maint@!
> >
> > There are RFC patches which implement RPMTAG_IDENTITY calculation.
> >
> > The main idea is that R
RPMTAG_IDENTITY is calculating as digest of part of package header that
does not contain irrelevant to package build tag entries.
Mathematically RPMTAG_IDENTITY value is a result of function of two
variable: a package header and an rpm utility, thus this value can
differ for same package and diffe
Rewritten patch as tag extention.
___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
ENTITY tag set might also need to
> be configurable without recompiling.
May be it would be easier to add marker that tells that marked tag
should be filtered from IDENTITY by calculation? But what is best way to
do that? Should I add a new field to struct headerTagTableEntry_s? Or I
miss something?
> But overall, dynamically generating the IDENTITY tag set withe a tag
> extension can be deployed (and back ported and maintained) far more
> easily than changing header code.
>
> Nice job!
--
With best regards,
Vladimir D. Seleznev
___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 11:41:33AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 04/03/2018 10:31 PM, Vladimir D. Seleznev wrote:
> > RPMTAG_IDENTITY is calculating as digest of part of package header that
> > does not contain irrelevant to package build tag entries.
> >
> > Mat
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 03:42:15PM +0300, Vladimir D. Seleznev wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 11:41:33AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > On 04/03/2018 10:31 PM, Vladimir D. Seleznev wrote:
> > > RPMTAG_IDENTITY is calculating as digest of part of package header that
>
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 05:18:14PM -0400, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
>
> > On Apr 5, 2018, at 4:41 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> >
> >> On 04/03/2018 10:31 PM, Vladimir D. Seleznev wrote:
> >> RPMTAG_IDENTITY is calculating as digest of part of package header that
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 08:52:15AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 04/05/2018 03:42 PM, Vladimir D. Seleznev wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 11:41:33AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> >> On 04/03/2018 10:31 PM, Vladimir D. Seleznev wrote:
> >>> RPMTAG_IDENTI
You convinced me that there should be whitelist filter, so I rewrote
code for it. Follow Panu suggestion [1] I wrote .C generator to filter
proper rpm tags. But currently it does not allow this suggestion [2] by
jbj@:
"The members (and ordering) of the IDENTITY tag set might also
need to be config
Keyword `identity' for a tag in rpmTag means that the tag will be used
for RPMTAG_IDENTITY calculation.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir D. Seleznev
---
lib/rpmtag.h | 282 +--
1 file changed, 140 insertions(+), 142 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/rpm
identityMatch() matches tag that should be awared in identity
calculation. The function generator inspects rpmtag.h tag list for tag
identity marker and constructs positive filter function that is adding
to tagext.c.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir D. Seleznev
---
lib/Makefile.am | 8
utility, thus this value can
differ for same package and different version of rpm.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir D. Seleznev
---
lib/tagexts.c | 72 +++
1 file changed, 72 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/tagexts.c b/lib/tagexts.c
index 61e9b702b
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 03:25:36PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 9/19/18 12:23 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > On 8/23/18 12:01 AM, Vladimir D. Seleznev wrote:
> >> You convinced me that there should be whitelist filter, so I rewrote
> >> code for it. Follow Pan
Signed-off-by: Vladimir D. Seleznev
---
lib/query.c | 2 +-
macros.in | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/query.c b/lib/query.c
index e47189ed0..5605f82b9 100644
--- a/lib/query.c
+++ b/lib/query.c
@@ -600,7 +600,7 @@ int rpmcliQuery(rpmts ts, QVA_t qva
ALT Linux Team distributions use disttag to differ various package
builds of the same package NEVR, so dbiFindByLabelArch tries to match
the package against name[-[epoch:]version[-release[-disttag]]][.arch].
Signed-off-by: Vladimir D. Seleznev
---
lib/rpmdb.c | 60
Signed-off-by: Vladimir D. Seleznev
---
lib/rpmte.c | 8
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/rpmte.c b/lib/rpmte.c
index d33be1727..c2cc23d21 100644
--- a/lib/rpmte.c
+++ b/lib/rpmte.c
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ struct rpmte_s {
Header h; /*!< Package hea
In ALT Linux Team distributions there can be different builds of the one
package NEVR. The builds differ in disttag, so it is useful to print its
value while querying package information.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir D. Seleznev
---
rpmpopt.in | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a
rsion-release[-disttag].arch where it makes
sense; if disttag value is empty, rpm prints
name-[epoch:]version-release.arch;
* take name[-[epoch:]version[-release[-disttag]]][.arch] as an argument
for some package operations such as erasing.
Please, comment.
--
With best regards,
Vladi
Signed-off-by: Vladimir D. Seleznev
---
lib/depends.c | 24
lib/rpmdb.c | 6 +++---
lib/rpminstall.c | 2 +-
lib/rpmscript.c | 6 +++---
lib/transaction.c | 4 ++--
5 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/depends.c b/lib
Signed-off-by: Vladimir D. Seleznev
---
lib/rpmte.c | 7 +++
lib/rpmte.h | 7 +++
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/rpmte.c b/lib/rpmte.c
index c5d614f67..d33be1727 100644
--- a/lib/rpmte.c
+++ b/lib/rpmte.c
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ struct rpmte_s {
char * epoch
These extensions construct name-[epoch:]version-release[-disttag].arch
if RPMTAG_DISTTAG is non-empty, otherwise they work as RPMTAG_NVRA and
RPMTAG_NEVRA respectively.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir D. Seleznev
---
lib/rpmtag.h | 2 ++
lib/tagexts.c | 19 ++-
2 files changed, 20
Verbose QueryTags prints four field: tagname, tagvalue, tagtype and whether
it is an extension. To make it possible QueryTags uses new function
rpmTagIsExtension() that returns 0 if tag is real, 1 if tag is an extension
or -1 if tag is not found.
* lib/query.c(rpmDisplayQueryTags): Print whether t
35 matches
Mail list logo
