seth vidal ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
Perhaps the better tack is to use this patch as an example, change
package policies, and just remove the calls from the rpms themselves.
That would work :)
Would it be worthwhile to modify the patch to just warn us that
something is calling
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Testing used for the following patch:
...
Of course, it's a complete buzzsaw of a patch. To make this work,
we'd need:
1) define one run of this as a post-transaction tool
2) make it packaging policy that the proper symlinks always be
shipped in the package
In
