Yup, this will find its way into 4.19 in Beta (planned for ~ end of month).
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2523#issuecomment-1587284491
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: _
Could you please add this to 4.19 as well?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2523#issuecomment-1587265425
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: __
Closed #2523 as completed via #2525.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2523#event-9374869022
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rp
Argh, #2526 of course :facepalm:
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2523#issuecomment-1567008551
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: ___
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2256 ? Did you mean
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2526 ?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2523#issuecomment-1567005064
You are receiving this becau
Yeah, it seems like the proposed `%rpmversion` macro would indeed be a good fit
for SPEC syntax changes in general. Having a separate version for the SPEC
format might perhaps come in handy in the future, too, but not sure.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.co
Heh, that really drives home that the glob effort by @dmnks was well worth it.
And okay, I don't think there's a "good" way to detect that, but that did
inspire #2256.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2523#issuecomment-
A number of % signs to escape a literal % sign in the file list. RPM 4.17 and
4.18 needed 8 of them, 4.19 is sane and only needs 2.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2523#issuecomment-1566870904
You are receiving this beca
