2009/3/18 Per Øyvind Karlsen
> 2009/3/18 Panu Matilainen
>
> On Sun, 15 Mar 2009, Per Ųyvind Karlsen wrote:
>>
>> 2009/3/10 Jindrich Novy
>>> On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 12:24:17PM +0100, Mark Rosenstand
>>> wrote:
>>> > RPM won't build against
>>> > the xz 4.999.8beta running
2009/3/18 Panu Matilainen
> On Sun, 15 Mar 2009, Per Ųyvind Karlsen wrote:
>
> 2009/3/10 Jindrich Novy
>> On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 12:24:17PM +0100, Mark Rosenstand
>> wrote:
>> > RPM won't build against
>> > the xz 4.999.8beta running here. But this was also the case
>>
On Sun, 15 Mar 2009, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
2009/3/10 Jindrich Novy
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 12:24:17PM +0100, Mark Rosenstand
wrote:
> RPM won't build against
> the xz 4.999.8beta running here. But this was also the case
for 4.6.0.
Fixed. The HEAD rpm should bu
2009/3/10 Jindrich Novy
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 12:24:17PM +0100, Mark Rosenstand wrote:
> > RPM won't build against
> > the xz 4.999.8beta running here. But this was also the case for 4.6.0.
>
> Fixed. The HEAD rpm should build (and work) fine with xz-4.999.8beta.
>
> Jindrich
Yet it's still
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 12:24:17PM +0100, Mark Rosenstand wrote:
> RPM won't build against
> the xz 4.999.8beta running here. But this was also the case for 4.6.0.
Fixed. The HEAD rpm should build (and work) fine with xz-4.999.8beta.
Jindrich
--
Jindrich Novyhttp://people.redhat.com/jnovy/
2009/3/9 Mark Rosenstand
> Hi Panu,
>
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Panu Matilainen
> wrote:
> >
> > Didn't expect a new version this soon? Frankly, we didn't either :)
> > In the months that RPM 4.6.0 spent in stabilization phase of numerous
> > release candidates we had plenty of time to
Hi Panu,
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> Didn't expect a new version this soon? Frankly, we didn't either :)
> In the months that RPM 4.6.0 spent in stabilization phase of numerous
> release candidates we had plenty of time to work on new things, and as
> things have b
Didn't expect a new version this soon? Frankly, we didn't either :)
In the months that RPM 4.6.0 spent in stabilization phase of numerous
release candidates we had plenty of time to work on new things, and as
things have been fairly stable for a while now, it started looking like a
good time t
