[Rpm-maint] RE: [PATCH,RFC] arm: add support for VFP architectures

2008-01-15 Thread Rabeeh Khoury
> > > The problem with that would be that RPM package file names for VFP > > and non-VFP packages would be identical. > > Sure, but remember rpm package file names don't actually mean anything > other then the name of the file. :) > > Just a suggestion. IMHO the same as you forbid installing P

[Rpm-maint] RE: [PATCH,RFC] arm: add support for VFP architectures

2008-01-15 Thread Hatle, Mark
This is where package dependencies come in. If the package depends on a hardware support for VFP, then the system needs to have a corresponding provide or it won't install. (Of course people can use --nodeps.. but similarly they can use --ignorearch.) In RPM 4.4.x ARCH implies certain hardwar

[Rpm-maint] Re: [PATCH,RFC] arm: add support for VFP architectures

2008-01-15 Thread Mark Hatle
Lennert Buytenhek wrote: On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 12:44:06PM -0600, Mark Hatle wrote: So I'm a bit concerned that adding "...evl" (or ...evb) is going to be confusing in the name. What we have done is called it armv5el_vfp. I've considered that, but that breaks configure scripts that match aga

[Rpm-maint] Re: [PATCH,RFC] arm: add support for VFP architectures

2008-01-14 Thread Lennert Buytenhek
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 12:44:06PM -0600, Mark Hatle wrote: > >>So I'm a bit concerned that adding "...evl" (or ...evb) is going to > >>be confusing in the name. > >> > >>What we have done is called it armv5el_vfp. > > > >I've considered that, but that breaks configure scripts that match > >agains

[Rpm-maint] Re: [PATCH,RFC] arm: add support for VFP architectures

2008-01-14 Thread Mark Hatle
Lennert Buytenhek wrote: On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 11:01:46AM -0600, Mark Hatle wrote: (please CC on replies, I'm not on rpm-maint@) The attached patch adds a 'v' near the end of the machine name if the (ARM) system we're running on supports VFP. This allows building and using VFP-optimised RPM

[Rpm-maint] Re: [PATCH,RFC] arm: add support for VFP architectures

2008-01-14 Thread Lennert Buytenhek
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 11:01:46AM -0600, Mark Hatle wrote: > > (please CC on replies, I'm not on rpm-maint@) > > > > The attached patch adds a 'v' near the end of the machine name if > > the (ARM) system we're running on supports VFP. This allows building > > and using VFP-optimised RPM package

[Rpm-maint] Re: [PATCH,RFC] arm: add support for VFP architectures

2008-01-03 Thread Mark Hatle
Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > (please CC on replies, I'm not on rpm-maint@) > > The attached patch adds a 'v' near the end of the machine name if > the (ARM) system we're running on supports VFP. This allows building > and using VFP-optimised RPM packages for ARM systems that have a VFP > floating p