@ffesti commented on this pull request.
> +return RPMRC_OK;
+}
+
+static rpmRC dbus_announce_tsm_pre(rpmPlugin plugin, rpmts ts)
+{
+int rc;
+
+rc = open_dbus(plugin, ts);
+if (rc != RPMRC_OK)
+ return rc;
+return send_ts_message(plugin, "StartTransaction", ts, RPMRC_OK
If $TAPE is set tar uses the tape drive instead of stdout as default.
The rpm2archive test assumed that tar will just use stdout no matter what.
Force this behaviour per command line option.
Resolves: rhbz#1902844
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.co
Minor nit pick: The name and usage of the new `stage` member in the last patch
isn't as obvious at probably should be. Also the numbers used are nicely
unrelated to the stages listed in the commit message. May be having named
constant instead of random numbers makes this more readable.
--
You
Do we really want to call `rpmpluginsCallFsmFilePost()` for all files in case
of failure? Or should be not call it at all in this case.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-manageme
If I had imagined the tool would be used in such a central role I might had
added a few more options right from the start. Adding those features should
pretty easy though. Feel free to bug me if you need help.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this em
Yes, this is intentional. All files in the docdir get automatically marked as
docs. If there is some specific use case where this creates problems please
re-open.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://gith
Closed #1368.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1368#event-4324585421___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.r
I guess the overall direction of rpm development is to rather add more lua than
adding more to the macro language. So I am closing this here as this is not
likely to happen any time soon... well any time actually.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to thi
Closed #1149.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1149#event-4324748371___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.r
While this is easy to implement this is probably not the right trade off. The
regular minimize writes feature already saves a lot. We'd rather not allow rpm
to take chances when it comes to correctness of the operation for a relatively
little speed up.
--
You are receiving this because you are
Closed #1080.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1080#event-4324886601___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.r
This was still missing from the Spec syntax documentation
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1539
-- Commit Summary --
* Add section for %generate_buildrequires to the manual
-- File Changes --
M doc/manua
My concerns have been addressed. Looks really good now!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1534#issuecomment-779645250__
@ffesti commented on this pull request.
> +state->logging = 1;
+
+/* ...don't log test transactions */
+if (rpmtsFlags(ts) & (RPMTRANS_FLAG_TEST|RPMTRANS_FLAG_BUILD_PROBS))
+ state->logging = 0;
+
+/* ...don't log chroot transactions */
+if (!rstreq(rpmtsRootDir(ts), "/
@ffesti commented on this pull request.
> +static rpmRC dbus_announce_init(rpmPlugin plugin, rpmts ts)
+{
+struct dbus_announce_data * state = rcalloc(1, sizeof(*state));
+rpmPluginSetData(plugin, state);
+return RPMRC_OK;
+}
+
+static rpmRC open_dbus(rpmPlugin plugin, rpmts ts)
+{
+
@ffesti commented on this pull request.
> + fprintf(stderr, "Connection Error (%s)\n", err.message);
+ dbus_error_free(&err);
+ }
+ if (state->bus) {
+ rc = dbus_bus_request_name(state->bus, "org.rpm.announce",
+
While many smaller things are fixed now. This still needs a run through the
error handling.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1255#issuecomment-779651408_
@ffesti commented on this pull request.
> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+'\" t
+.TH "RPM-DBUS-ANNOUNCE" "8" "03 Jun 2020" "Red Hat, Inc."
+.SH NAME
+rpm-plugin-dbus-announce \- DBus plugin for the RPM Package Manager
+
+.SH Description
+
+The plugin writes basic information about rpm transactions to the
+sys
The "Streamline + consolidate the hardlink handling logic" patch still makes my
head ache but I think it is fine. Other three patches look nice and simple in
comparison...
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
htt
The patch looks good. But I wonder how useful the new formats really are. I
have difficulty coming up with another use case other than what's in the test
case. That doesn't mean I am against adding them. But the whole discussion
started with packages having tags not yet supported by the system's
When it comes to the distribution automagically generating sub packages I agree
that the package need to be able to over write the behaviour. But I wonder if
this really should be done on the "automatic sub packages off/on" level.
Similar to what we have with debuginfo sub packages I'd rather ex
I guess I really need to write a proper design document...
When I think about distribution level sub package creation I think about
something very close to an brp-script - most likely a literal brp-script. Not
that I am a big fan of the way brp scripts are currently run. But I'd rather
improve t
I wonder if we could overload the assignment in the Python binding to translate
the list of strings back into the dict it originally were.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-mana
Merged #1604 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1604#event-4525791119___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-mai
Yeah, I guess we really don't want to read some random memory. Nice catch.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1604#issuecomment-809997582___
Merged #1611 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1611#event-4525797908___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-mai
I have no idea how you found this... but yes, nice catch!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1611#issuecomment-810003050
I wonder if moving %check to a later time instead of running it earlier does
the trick. If we first package the files and run %check afterwards it cannot
influence the package contents but still has access to the buildroot.
Yes, this comes at the price of failing the build after doing all of the
Closed #1614.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1614#event-4572854542___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.r
Well, the page says "Draft" for a reason. 4.17.0-alpha is not tagged because it
is not out yet. All actual releases are tagged in the git repository. Note that
we did not always do alpha releases in the past. RPM is such a central
component of the distribution that we don't really expect people
Merged #1624 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1624#event-4573869635___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-mai
Closed #1616 via #1624.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1616#event-4573869641___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-mai
While I like the overall idea of adding type hints to the binding I am not a
big fan of the content of python/rpm/_rpm.pyi. This basically duplicates the
API implementation in the C based API and is very easy to get out of sync.
Having this generated automatically during build time from the C b
The "Remove the need for special print syntax in Lua interactive mode" patch
does not really seem to cut it. `isassign` does not allow for white space but
also matches `a==5`. But the whole idea of printing everything is also ill
fated as there are compount statements like loops und if clauses.
May be it is worth peaking into the actual lua shell sources. I'd expect that
there should be a way to retrieve the value of the last expression somehow
using the lua C API.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
h
Also use popt for the command line handling. As we are using librpm
anyway there is no reason to keep the dependencies low (as with
rpm2cpio).
Resolves: #1530
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1657
-- Commit Summ
The pull request should only have the one relevant patch. Please rebase the
patch to the current master branch.
The patch is also missing a justification for the change. This should be part
of the commit message. But even ignoring the commit message I don't quite see
what you are trying to achi
After considering to expose more of libarchive's functionality like many
compression methods and archive formats I opted to only add an option for
uncompressed output - as requested.
Is the PR what you had in mind?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to th
Most language abbreviations are just two characters but some are longer.
Allow an arbiraty number of character instead of exactly two in the names
of .qm files (QT translations). This brings the handling of .qm files in
line with all other file types.
Resolves: #1642
You can view, comment on, or m
I understand the issue of symbols of the plugin vs system symbols as both may
be linked to different versions of a library or symbols may collide otherwise.
I am just not quite sure how or if at all this relates to RTLD_LAZY vs
RTLD_NOW. So while the change may be OK I wonder if the commit messa
Looks like the new file does not get automatically picked up by automake and
needs to be added to `EXTRA_DIST` in `tests/Makefile.am`.
Generally changes to the content (even if just rewording) and changing the
format as a whole should be done in separate patches but it's not a big deal
here. Fe
Oh, and thanks for the patch! Your attention to details like this is
appreciated!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1662#issuecomment-828468299___
about build dependencies
No idea how this could survive that long...
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1665
-- Commit Summary --
* Delete horribly outdated "documentation"
-- File Changes --
D doc/manual
@ffesti pushed 1 commit.
39db22fefe5c55477d02b5d6ce7194a042ac3094 Delete horribly outdated
"documentation"
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1665/files/6b60dc4920f24761c84500ede3e6f64c7c7
We have copied the documentation found on http://rpm.org/documentation.html to
`doc/manual/`, But there are some documents that are only in the git repository
and not on http://rpm.org. There is also no process to keep those places in
sync.
We need a way to turn the in-tree documentation into a
da55723907418bfb3939cd6ddd941b3fdb4f6887 add a paragraph to the in tree
documentation and dynamic build requires are also mentioned elsewhere (e.g. in
doc/manual/buildprocess.md).
Rather than making a separate page just for rpm.org we should sync up the
in-tree docs with the rpm.org web page: #
Closed #1029.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1029#event-4661421993___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.r
Merged #1662 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1662#event-4662071582___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-mai
OK, now there should be all issues raised so far being addressed. The plugin
now only gives a warning via `rpmlog` if the connection to dbus cannot be
obtained. From my POV this can be merged by squashing all commit into the first
one - or I can squash them first if that is prefered.
--
You ar
to avoid gh-pages taking them as Liquid tags
See https://shopify.dev/docs/themes/liquid/reference/tags for details.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1676
-- Commit Summary --
* Insert space between the "{" an
Merged #1676 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1676#event-4695505452___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-mai
This is an attempt to solve #1666. We have some documentation on
https://rpm.org that lives in the `rpm-web` repo and the docs in `doc/manual`
that should stay in the sources repo. Currently these are duplicated and
can't be kept in sync easily.
These cahnges re-arange the files so `docs/manual
@ffesti pushed 4 commits.
c41b4e8776b031a010b806fd7f94ed5d5798a5c1 Rename doc/ to docs/ to work with
GitHub Pages
dc7e0cfc9c506c04bd844fa3632feeb775195821 Move man pages into their own sub
directory
65c6bf8f36a4074d548fe1249c1cece94f6d9687 Add layout for adding manual/ to
Github pages
01033d
@ffesti pushed 2 commits.
fcb2ed6448e6013ab19dcfa596c72770bf8be8ed Convert man pages to markdown
918aa9faf57b72233ed36ed2994175154bb2910d Add index for man pages
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/
OK, here a preview on how markdown man pages could look like:
http://ffesti.github.io/rpm/man/
Still needs some work:
* Add `pandoc` as dependency and though make the test suite pass again.
* Check if both the Markdown and the resulting man pages are OK. This is just
piping everything blindly th
@ffesti pushed 2 commits.
0bcfba0eee9cbe35c8432f5bda8acf8a021eb931 Add pandoc as dependency
7df22b318dc9723932a8d2704989cd5d869a21ed Add generated man pages to gitignore
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-man
@ffesti pushed 1 commit.
dc46dfd9955e55f192e87f755b8b6447dca0427a Bump Fedora version used in the CI
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1679/files/7df22b318dc9723932a8d2704989cd5d869a21ed..
@ffesti pushed 1 commit.
eae879c7fe62162b04b7b91455635590869d0e45 Dont run pandoc in parallel
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1679/files/dc46dfd9955e55f192e87f755b8b6447dca0427a..eae879c
@ffesti pushed 1 commit.
3305427f8445258b35d4e683c9e9d00f1bb0948a Dont run pandoc in parallel
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1679/files/eae879c7fe62162b04b7b91455635590869d0e45..3305427
@ffesti pushed 0 commits.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1679/files/3305427f8445258b35d4e683c9e9d00f1bb0948a..7df22b318dc9723932a8d2704989cd5d869a21ed
___
@ffesti pushed 2 commits.
a1fb295947ec2fb8f4c804bf8eb067e1252bc96d Convert man pages to markdown
56f5b272fd8b3c7930cf6ef0a8cb0d87a19853dc Add index for man pages
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/
Closed #1530 via #1657.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1530#event-4716823295___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-mai
Merged #1657 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1657#event-4716823275___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-mai
Looks like pandoc has issues with the French and Japanese files. This work for
me locally. There are probably still some packages missing in the
`ci/Dockerfile. Unfortunately the error messages are all but helpful *sigh*
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply
OK, build is fixed.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1679#issuecomment-836768389___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-mai
@ffesti pushed 3 commits.
6b883c45fe1f5bc9908fbe82d7ccd7fecbc9de78 Add index.md for man pages
c9e3297d57a4b06becde060ccff2d6d25c6d8a73 Improve man page index.md
877df37125290478d754939c56ffd86ff67c11f3 Add index.md to docs dir
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thre
Merged #1679 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1679#event-4760538147___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-mai
Various fixes to the documentation
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1685
-- Commit Summary --
* Add favicon to documentation and fix header
* Fix typos and broken markup
* Remove reference to what is now t
@ffesti pushed 3 commits.
fb7e7ac375d18de48c9bbc1cdc273921db8a5031 Add favicon to documentation and fix
header
24ad6a7fae5b0dce4bf32afb120692195b6546fa Fix typos and broken markup
7c1b40063c4e3a0e56f2e8d2c77bacb8fe0b9d42 Remove reference to what is now the
same file
--
You are receiving th
Thanks for the fix!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1686#issuecomment-843951017___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-mai
Merged #1686 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1686#event-4765640841___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-mai
Merged #1685 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1685#event-4765649172___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-mai
The in-tree docs from master is now available as
https://rpm-software-management.github.io/rpm/
Plan is to link to it from rpm.org aka rpm-web as soon as it is a bit more
polished and then delete the duplicate pages from rpm-web.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thre
@ffesti commented on this pull request.
> @@ -0,0 +1,144 @@
+#include "system.h"
+
+#include
+#include
+#include
+#include
+#include
+#include
+#include
+#include "lib/rpmplugin.h"
+
+struct dbus_announce_data {
+DBusConnection * bus;
+int old_dboffset;
Done.
--
You are receivi
@ffesti pushed 1 commit.
9a51049918edca7572ab6efd27a45ee2ea9d98b8 Add dbus-announce plugin
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1255/files/a1e7a31155a3053e745473e477e1b755ebc5cdbd..9a51049918
@ffesti commented on this pull request.
> +dbcookie = rpmdbCookie(rpmtsGetRdb(ts));
+if (!dbus_message_append_args(msg, DBUS_TYPE_STRING, &dbcookie)) {
+ goto err;
+}
+dbcookie = _free(dbcookie);
+
+if (!dbus_connection_send(state->bus, msg, &serial)) {
+ goto err
@ffesti commented on this pull request.
> + return RPMRC_OK;
+
+/* ...don't notify on test transactions */
+if (rpmtsFlags(ts) & (RPMTRANS_FLAG_TEST|RPMTRANS_FLAG_BUILD_PROBS))
+ return RPMRC_OK;
+
+/* ...don't notify on chroot transactions */
+if (!rstreq(rpmtsRootDir(
@ffesti commented on this pull request.
> + rpmts ts,
+int res)
+{
+struct dbus_announce_data * state = rpmPluginGetData(plugin);
+DBusMessage* msg;
+dbus_uint32_t serial = 0;
+char * dbcookie;
+
+if (!state->bus) {
+
Rebased to current master
Switched man page over to new docs pattern (markdown, doc->docs move)
Squashed commits into one
Addressed above comments.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-softwa
@ffesti commented on this pull request.
> +if (!state->bus) {
+ return RPMRC_OK;
+}
+
+msg = dbus_message_new_signal("/org/rpm/Transaction", /* object name */
+ "org.rpm.Transaction", /* interface name */
+ name);
Mainly reformat and improve the Tags page.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1691
-- Commit Summary --
* Convert tags page in reference manual to tables
* Add introduction to tags and tag types
* Add Table
http://ffesti.github.io/rpm/manual/tags.html for the rendered result.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1691#issuecomment-851255353___
Guess this is done.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1530#issuecomment-851368084___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-m
The recent developments in what used to be the freenode IRC network
force us to look for a new home for our IRC channels. As a result we -
as so many other projects - are moving to the Libera.chat network.
Discussion about the RPM tool and project itself can continue in the
#rpm channel there. Top
As we allow dependeny flags like pre, post, ... in the spec syntax we
should not remove them when reading in the tags from a package.
Thanks to Michael Schröder for spotting this.
Resolves: #1703
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-ma
Nope. This is clearly an oversight. Too many places to touch to add a new type
of dependency.
Interestingly enough weak dependencies are not stripped although we currently
do not support flags for them.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email di
Yeah, the script runs `readelf` for every regular file in the `$RPM_BUILD_ROOT`
- twice and in series. That's something we painstakingly avoided for all the
other brp scripts affecting the kernel (and others).
I can switch this over for parallel processing, too. But weeding out the files
that ne
See #1713
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1714
-- Commit Summary --
* Run rpath check in parallel
* Don't break readelf output at 80 characters
-- File Changes --
M scripts/check-rpaths (4)
M scri
Not quite sure how I detect those. Also we already executed `readelf` by that
point, right?
Is there a way of skipping files based on file attributes I can pass to `find`
like file name, executable bit etc?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this emai
@ffesti pushed 1 commit.
a2bd159f17a11f92dadcde2a118cca59fbec8296 check-rpaths: Look for RPATH and
RUNPATH in one go
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1714/files/98006bef1a2212095d1c69f28
Yeah, I figured this would help, but it took your message for me to see how to
do that in an clean and easy way.
Can someone test the changes, please. May be even with one of the long running
builds like kernel.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this
@ffesti pushed 1 commit.
56ed63e63f18a9af1c1a1d3340dfcccd5b855e13 check-rpaths: Look for RPATH and
RUNPATH in one go
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1714/files/a2bd159f17a11f92dadcde2a1
Ok, there were still some issues with quoting. Should work now and produce
proper messages.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1714#issuecomment-865305016_
to avoid rebuilding the man pages over and over again
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1722
-- Commit Summary --
* Create directories for man pages right away
-- File Changes --
M docs/man/Makefile.am (6
@ffesti pushed 1 commit.
8247a1ac3195802763994a99461913185abbf036 Add generated man pages to tar ball
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1722/files/3b55840405f143b08462b85bab289a7cf27a590b.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1730
-- Commit Summary --
* Also add rendered Japanese man pages
* Don't depend on translation sub directories
-- File Changes --
M docs/man/Makefile.am (3)
-- Patch
> Having to depends on Haskell in order to build rpm is big bullet to swallow !
This is not intentional. While pandoc is needed to create the release tarball
(or make changes to the man pages) requiring pandoc for building from the
release tarball is not intended. The man pages should be shipped
Merged #1735 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1735#event-4946628164___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-mai
Merged #1733 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1733#event-4946754436___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-mai
Merged #1734 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1734#event-4946813124___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-mai
801 - 900 of 1891 matches
Mail list logo
