Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 18.11.2008 00:33, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
snip
IIRC someone said earlier that some people wouldn't contribute to
RPMFusion
if it was in any way associated with distribution of libdvdcss, but never
mentioned any names or what these contributors would
On Tuesday, 18 November 2008 at 01:12, مؤيد السعدي wrote:
why we don't pack suns' java like them ? is there any legal issue ?
We build from source. this includes the jdk.
hello! I'm talking about nonfree branch of rpmfusion
that's why I'm not posting to fedora-devel
rpmfusion contains
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124
--- Comment #19 from Sergio Pascual [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-18 11:18:05 ---
Well, this pgplot is patched to look for pgxwin_server in /usr/libexec/pgplot
Your program is compiled statically or dynamically?
--
Configure bugmail:
Farkas Levente wrote:
any change to skype work out of box without this workaround in the near
future?
You can report the problem to Skype and ask them to fix it.
Rahul
Farkas Levente wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 21:31 +0100, Farkas Levente
wrote:
the gspca-kmod missing for the latest kernel.
it'd be useful for
everybody who has webcam.
# rpm -qpl
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
AFAIK Sun's JDK is (almost) the same as OpenJDK.
almost but not identical. A colleague of mine cannot use Yahoo Games
with openjdk-plugin from EPEL, while it works without problems with
Sun's (rebuilt by me using jpackage.org
Hi!
I thought we have sorted that out. Do we really have to go through this
discussion again?
Just ignore that issue. We should satisfy the majority's needs, and
the majority of Fedora users (obviously) needs DVD playback (as well
as other patents/crypto stuff). If that guy(s) stops
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:03 PM, manuel wolfshant
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
AFAIK Sun's JDK is (almost) the same as OpenJDK.
almost but not identical. A colleague of mine cannot use Yahoo Games
with openjdk-plugin from EPEL, while it works without
On 18.11.2008 13:04, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:07:05 +0100, RPM Fusion Bugzilla wrote:
--- Comment #18 from Joachim Frieben [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-18 11:07:04
---
Since there is no component pgplot in Bugzilla yet, let me add a current issue
here:
Then somebody fix
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Sure, the latter is a bit more complicated, but imho it's the right
thing to do, especially as the user might do something that is illegal
in his country.
I do not consider it our job to prevent people doing illegal acts.
Furthermore, the
On 18.11.2008 13:19, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 18.11.2008 13:04, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:07:05 +0100, RPM Fusion Bugzilla wrote:
--- Comment #18 from Joachim Frieben [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-18 11:07:04
---
Since there is no component pgplot in Bugzilla yet, let me
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Hans de Goede wrote:
Also this seems to be an ever sliding issue, first we would ship it despite
the
concerns of a few, then you changed your mind and I and others reluctantly
agreed, but we also agreed we would come up with some seamless integration
solution. And
manuel wolfshant wrote:
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
AFAIK Sun's JDK is (almost) the same as OpenJDK.
almost but not identical. A colleague of mine cannot use Yahoo Games
with openjdk-plugin from EPEL, while it works without problems with
Sun's (rebuilt by me using jpackage.org
Hello!
2008/11/18 Andreas Thienemann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Sure, the latter is a bit more complicated, but imho it's the right
thing to do, especially as the user might do something that is illegal
in his country.
I do not consider it our job to
Hello!
2008/11/18 Richard Körber [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Just ignore that issue. We should satisfy the majority's needs, and
the majority of Fedora users (obviously) needs DVD playback (as well
as other patents/crypto stuff). If that guy(s) stops contributing -
that's not a problem at all. We
On Tuesday, 18 November 2008 at 13:27, Andreas Thienemann wrote:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Hans de Goede wrote:
[...]
And Fedora Legal actually has cleared doing that (linking to rpmfusion from
the
wiki), this is something which still has to be implemented, but the
permission
is there.
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Richard Körber wrote:
For me it means that if RPMfusion is offering software that is illegal in
Germany, I will stop blogging about it in fedorablog.de and remove the
package lists from repowatch.fedorablog.de. You can blame me for being a
sissy, but I see no other option
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124
--- Comment #20 from Joachim Frieben [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-18 14:31:37
---
Looks like it doesn not work either way:
a. All demo executables /usr/bin/pgdemo?* are not linked dynamically against
the pgplot library. Yet, above error
On 18.11.2008 14:42, Sergio Pascual wrote:
My email is wrong. The line should be
Fedora|pgplot|Graphic library for making simple scientific
graphs|[EMAIL PROTECTED]||
parsa - pasra
Fixed.
Cu
thl
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:24 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 18.11.2008
On 18.11.2008 14:38, Karel Volný wrote:
To the people who are responsible for RPMfusion: Please make up
your mind, and then make an official and irrevocable (!) commitment
pro or contra libdvdcss.
I second that ... but ... who is that?
http://rpmfusion.org/ - SteeringCommittee
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124
Sergio Pascual [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
hi,
To the people who are responsible for RPMfusion: Please
make up your mind, and then make an official and
irrevocable (!) commitment pro or contra libdvdcss.
I second that ... but ... who is that?
http://rpmfusion.org/ - SteeringCommittee
http://rpmfusion.org/SteeringCommittee
Hello Dejan!
2008/11/18 Dejan Lekic [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I am willing to maintain Portable.NET (or so-called the dotGNU project)
packages. Portable.NET is an open-source, (L)GPL, implementation of the .NET
2.0 . I use my dotGNU RPMs quiet often and so far I haven't seen any problem
with them.
Hi,
On Tuesday, 18 November 2008 at 16:00, Dejan Lekic wrote:
[...]
I am willing to maintain Portable.NET (or so-called the dotGNU project)
packages. Portable.NET is an open-source, (L)GPL, implementation of the .NET
2.0 . I use my dotGNU RPMs quiet often and so far I haven't seen any problem
Hello Peter,
frankly I did not think they would go into the main repository, at least not
yet. If Fedora guys later on decide to put it there, I would not mind,
naturally. :) I like the RPMFusion idea as I used all those repositories
earlier, and I want to be part of it.
Kind regards
On Tue, Nov
On Tuesday, 18 November 2008 at 16:12, Dejan Lekic wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Peter Lemenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/11/18 Dejan Lekic [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I am willing to maintain Portable.NET (or so-called the dotGNU project)
packages. Portable.NET is an open-source,
Hello everybody,
my name is Dejan Lekic and I am, among other things a core developer of the
FLTK project (http://www.fltk.org). I am a 33 years old software engineer /
system developer from Sweden/Serbia (born in Serbia). At the moment I am
pursuing my second degree, this time in Computer
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 18.11.2008 11:12, Hans de Goede wrote:
it is one of the repos which make up the new rpmfusion, also we want
this to work seamlessly.
Enabling a repository that ships libdvdcss automatically is nearly just
as bad as shipping it directly in our repos (¹). It hence
Dejan Lekic wrote:
Hello everybody,
my name is Dejan Lekic and I am, among other things a core developer of
the FLTK project (http://www.fltk.org).
...
I have some more RPMs that would be very interesting to be in rpmfusion,
but, since I am new here, I thought it would be the best to begin
Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Hello!
2008/11/18 Andreas Thienemann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Sure, the latter is a bit more complicated, but imho it's the right
thing to do, especially as the user might do something that is illegal
in his country.
I do not
PS. do we have an IRC channel perhaps?
We do. It's #rpmfusion on FreeNode.
but the only page it is officially mentioned is
http://rpmfusion.org/AnnounceRepository
(I mean not on personal pages)
it would fit nicely nearby the mailing lists link, but on the
other hand it would not be too
Hello Rex,
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Rex Dieter wrote:
[Not shipping something in order to prevent people from comitting legally
questionable acts in their locale]
I am swayed by that argument, but this is a special case.
I'm still very concerned over issues around
1. fedora being able to
On 18.11.2008 15:43, Karel Volný wrote:
To the people who are responsible for RPMfusion: Please
make up your mind, and then make an official and
irrevocable (!) commitment pro or contra libdvdcss.
I second that ... but ... who is that?
http://rpmfusion.org/ - SteeringCommittee
Andreas Thienemann wrote:
(wishlist/todo: create a FAQ on the wiki for this very issue, so we
don't need to rehash/rediscuss it every few weeks). :)
Problem is, it's not question which can be answered in a definite way.
The FAQ should state *facts*, and the already-mentioned-many-times
We already ship java-1.6.0-openjdk and gcj.
no this is not the same we
we in fedora do ship java-1.6.0-openjdk and gcj
we in rpmfusion don't
so we are fine here
Dejan Lekic wrote:
Hello Peter,
frankly I did not think they would go into the main repository, at
least not yet. If Fedora guys later on decide to put it there, I would
not mind, naturally. :) I like the RPMFusion idea as I used all those
repositories earlier, and I want to be part of it.
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: 10
buildsys-build-rpmfusion-10-0.10
em8300-kmod-0.17.2-1.fc10.2
iscsitarget-kmod-0.4.15-41.svn147.fc10.7
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 8: 2
NEW broadcom-wl-5.10.27.6-3.fc8 : Common files for Broadcom 802.11 STA driver
NEW wl-kmod-5.10.27.6-5.fc8 : Kernel module for broadcom wireless devices
for those who suggested that it could be a bug in Sarf or openjdk
I don't care because I don't use any java stuff
but if I can type Arabic letters in GTK+ and QT but not Java then it's
openjdk bug
anyway it's not my choice nor yours
as free system is not a system which you can't run proprietary
--- On Tue, 11/18/08, Andreas Thienemann wrote:
Hello Rex,
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Rex Dieter wrote:
[Not shipping something in order to prevent people from
comitting legally
questionable acts in their locale]
I am swayed by that argument, but this is a special
case.
I'm still
مؤيد السعدي wrote:
we don't have a license to modify sun's
but we have a license to distribute it
I only request packing it in a proper way that
1. yum enabled repo
+1
2. sane provides to satisfy fedora's package requests (like netbeans)
3. does not break or replace any thing (instead it
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 7:01 PM, Orcan Ogetbil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe that we should put a disclaimer notice on the
rpmfusion-nonfree-release RPM, telling the users that it is their
responsibility to check the license and the legal issues by installing any
package from this
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday, 18 November 2008 at 16:12, Dejan Lekic wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Peter Lemenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
2008/11/18 Dejan Lekic [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I am willing to
On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 12:18 +0100, Richard Körber wrote:
For me it means that if RPMfusion is offering software that is illegal in
Germany,
reference?
To my knowledge, libdvdcss legal position is questionable and unclear in
Germany, but so for has not been proven illegal.
Ralf
Hi all!
I don't think we need formal freeze rules for the development repo, but
to make sure that we are in good shape for F10 I'd suggest that everyone
makes sure all the important bugs in the RPM Fusion's development
repos are fixed and that comps.xml is in shape for those that want to
45 matches
Mail list logo
