http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393
--- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth 2009-02-26 00:30:39 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> The util package contains the scripts necessary to generate a new database.
>
> This is basically not needed for normal utilization which is why I put it int
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Thienemann 2009-02-26 00:15:19
---
The util package contains the scripts necessary to generate a new database.
This is basically not needed for normal utilization which is why I put it into
a second package.
The
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p...@city-fan.org
Blocks|
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Well in that case ;-) Do the information on http://rpmfusion.org/Mirrors
> answer your questions?
Well right. I wonder how I could miss it. Thanks.
--
This message represents the official view of the voices in my head
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396
--- Comment #11 from Eric Moret 2009-02-25 19:07:20 ---
SPEC:
ftp://ftp.zouric.com/public/paintdotnet/paintdotnet.spec
SRPM:
ftp://ftp.zouric.com/public/paintdotnet/paintdotnet-0.1-0.4.63svn.fc10.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzi
Hi!
On 25.02.2009 17:02, Paul Komkoff wrote:
I apologise in advance if I picked the wrong list.
It's the right list
I accept any karmic punishment with appropriate stoicism.
Well in that case ;-) Do the information on http://rpmfusion.org/Mirrors
answer your questions?
/me is not sure,
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=308
--- Comment #16 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2009-02-25
18:01:16 ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> Package CVS request
Done (btw, to make sure the request is definitely seen let the bug block Bug
33 next time)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzi
# CCed to epel-devel-list, as the audience there might be interested in
# this mail as well; nevertheless please send replies to
# rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org only, tia!
Hi!
As some of you may know: RPM Fusion ( http://rpmfusion.org/ ) not only
supports Fedora, it also wants to sup
Hi.
I apologise in advance if I picked the wrong list. I accept any karmic
punishment with appropriate stoicism.
Do we have any way for an external parties like me to access rpmfusion
mirrormanager database? I am mirroring the whole subtree and is
genuinely interested to limit the bandwidth waste
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=308
--- Comment #15 from Felix Kaechele 2009-02-25 17:00:11 ---
Thank you for your review Orcan! It's much appreciated!
Package CVS request
==
Package Name: ultrastardx
Short Description: Karaoke game inspired by a popular co
On 25.02.2009 14:46, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Maybe it would be better to drop it from yum-utils in Fedora and ship it
as separate package in RPM Fusion?
I think that is a good idea, if a 3 part repo is containing kernel
module there need special plugins, then they should
2009/2/25 Tim Lauridsen :
> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>
>> Maybe it would be better to drop it from yum-utils in Fedora and ship it
>> as separate package in RPM Fusion?
>>
>
> I think that is a good idea, if a 3 part repo is containing kernel module
> there need special plugins, then they should be
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Maybe it would be better to drop it from yum-utils in Fedora and ship it
as separate package in RPM Fusion?
I think that is a good idea, if a 3 part repo is containing kernel
module there need special plugins, then they should be ship in the 3
part repo. As it is i
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406
--- Comment #1 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2009-02-25
14:38:27 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> == rpmfusion-cvs ==
> rpmfusion-cvs allows you to easily checkout modules from RPM Fusion's cvs.
> Usage: rpmfusion-cvs [free|nonfree] [module1] [OPTION
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis
wrote:
> Sure, but do we have the manpower to mentor someone and will Google think we
> have it/accept us as project? I wouldn't do the latter if I would have to
> chose; I'd tell us "realize your ideas as GSoC project within the Fedora
> project
On 25.02.2009 09:27, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
=== Ideas nobody is working on ===
+ [musuruan: is it feasible to have some of these ideas as GSoC?]
I'm not really familiar with GSoC, but I doubt that it'll work when we do it
directly. M
Hi Tim!
One warning: I never looked really much into yum-fedorakmod myself. But
I hope I (or someone else) will find time for it soon, as it could make
things easier with the changes reg. the kernel variants that are planed
for F11:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ArchitectureSupport
Hi
I am investigation the possibilities to remove all kind of kernel module
plugin from yum-utils. Ex. yum-fedorakmod
As far as I can see they should not be necessary with the current
kernel-modules in rpmfusion. they even make troubles in some cases.
If anybody sees any case where the plug
sorry for reviving this ...
> > Well, the issue is that the game is clearly disparaging
> > Microsoft and its marks. I'm not sure any amount of
> > "artwork" replacement will overcome that.
>
> WTF, since when is parody illegal? It's even an exception to
> copyright and trademark law.
>
>
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396
--- Comment #10 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-02-25 10:20:31
---
(In reply to comment #9)
> I have updated the package again with a script to generate the tarball from
> cvs
> and remove the unlicensed dll
Can you please post the link to the
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Andrea, thx for your comments and enhancements. Much appreciated.
You are welcome.
> One general remark: I guess we should try to keep the page itself discussion
> free once we finish it.
>
>> === Ideas nobody is working on ===
>> + [
21 matches
Mail list logo
