Kwizart,
You ask me on IRC, if I can do a scratch build and no I got an error
(GenericError: invalid channel policy)
rpmfusion-koji build --scratch f24-free ./smplayer-16.6.0-1.fc24.src.rpm
Uploading srpm: ./smplayer-16.6.0-1.fc24.src.rpm
[] 100% 00:00:02
On Qua, 2016-06-15 at 21:29 +1000, Chris Smart wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> By request, following up a conversation I started on IRC...
>
> I run Korora[1], a Fedora Remix which relies heavily on RPMFusion, so
> firstly, thanks for all the great work. I think it has been taken for
> granted RPMFusion is
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3161
--- Comment #6 from Sérgio Basto 2016-06-23 04:45:24 CEST
---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Here you have a little explanation and links to more explanation about
> relation
> between the new AMDGPU libre driver and Crimson propietary one, and a
Forgot to tell you in this moment our focus is in packages for F24 ,
not for F23 , neither rawhide ...
On Qui, 2016-06-23 at 02:10 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
> First alleluia ! the mail is back in business, so we can chat again.
> (I
> have about 176 message to read ! )
>
> Please underst
On Qua, 2016-06-22 at 19:30 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 06/22/2016 05:17 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> >
> > So we agree!
> We do not agree.
>
> >
> > Now do you really beleive I should untag koji-16 from koji for
> > f24-free and build kodi-17 instead ?
> I have not asked for that.
O
Hi,
First alleluia ! the mail is back in business, so we can chat again. (I
have about 176 message to read ! )
Please understand (Alec and Michael) the platform and new infra was
raised with a lot effort of kwizart. One the most difficult things (for
me) is deal with communication many people use
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Michael Cronenworth
wrote:
> On 06/22/2016 04:23 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>
>> Please read again what I've said, I have no issue to backport kodi 17
>> to stable (f24) at some point.
>> There is nothing wrong against updating f24 kodi 16 to 17 18 or
>> whatever
On 06/22/2016 05:17 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
So we agree!
We do not agree.
Now do you really beleive I should untag koji-16 from koji for
f24-free and build kodi-17 instead ?
I have not asked for that.
On 21/06/2016 22:11, Stuart Gathman wrote:
> On 06/21/2016 03:48 PM, Mario Blättermann wrote:
>> Don't know about the reasons anymore why libdvdcss is not in
>> rpmfusion... But if you want to have it, consider to enable the repo
>> of Remi Collet:
>> http://rpms.famillecollet.com/
>
> Probably be
2016-06-21 16:49 GMT+02:00 Richard Shaw :
> Ok, upload-sources worked for me and I believe everything correct for a
> build.
>
> Is the new infra only good for master and f24? Or can I merge the changes to
> the f23 branch as well?
Good question, all branches are open for work, but el7 first needs
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 05:45:57PM +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Good question, all branches are open for work, but el7 first needs to
> be bootstrapped (any volunteer for that ?)
What needs to be bootstrapped? Can't CentOS and EPEL 7 just be used as
as a package source like Fedora is used for
2016-06-21 16:06 GMT+02:00 Richard Shaw :
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I just want to say that there is now a minimal version of rfpkg available.
>> http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=447
>
>
> Great news! Until there is a solution
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3161
leigh scott changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
2016-06-21 18:54 GMT+02:00 Till Maas :
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 05:45:57PM +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>
>> Good question, all branches are open for work, but el7 first needs to
>> be bootstrapped (any volunteer for that ?)
>
> What needs to be bootstrapped? Can't CentOS and EPEL 7 just be used
On 06/22/2016 03:34 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
Not at all, sir, alpha is way too late for f24 GA, about to be
released just NOW!
Also I'm not very pleased with me having to fix your FTBFS kodi
package despite the appropriate backport was made available to you via
github.
I'm fine if you update k
Hello , with clean rfpkg
rfpkg -d -v new-sources x264-0.148-20160614-a5e06b9.tar.bz2
works !!
https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/repo/pkgs/free/x264/x264-0.148-20160614-a5e06b9.tar.bz2/md5/504515ba14fed322ad89cf39f05e78ee/
the file is there
rfpkg-free srpm , works when I use https in lookaside ( loo
2016-06-23 0:23 GMT+02:00 Alec Leamas :
>
>
> On 22/06/16 23:40, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>>
>> Can you please explain a little more your point of view ? and what did
>> you expect ?
>
>
> Basically, two things. The first is some decency - this does not include
> being called an idiot on the list by
2016-06-21 18:16 GMT+02:00 Richard Shaw :
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>>
>> > Ok, upload-sources worked for me and I believe everything correct for a
>> > build.
>>
>> are you sure ?
>
>
> Mine didn't show any errors:
>
> $ rfpkg new-sources ~/rpmbuild/mythtv/SOURCES/my
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3161
Sérgio Basto changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ser...@serjux.com
--- Comment #4 from Sé
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just want to say that there is now a minimal version of rfpkg available.
> http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=447
Great news! Until there is a solution for uploading sources, what procedure
should I follow
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30
Bug 30 depends on bug 3161, which changed state.
Bug 3161 Summary: Review request: catalyst-kmod - AMD display driver kernel
module
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3161
What|Old Value |New Value
--
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3687
--- Comment #21 from leigh scott 2016-06-19 18:51:13
CEST ---
Catalyst driver is no longer maintained by amd
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
Please do not touch Kodi.
Do not commit patches. Do not create a build. Do not collect $200.
I am in the process of updating Kodi to 17 alpha. I do not want a Fedora 24+
build yet.
Thanks,
Michael
> Ok, upload-sources worked for me and I believe everything correct for a
build.
are you sure ?
rfpkg -d -v new-sources x264-0.148-20160614-a5e06b9.tar.bz2
Creating repo object from /home/sergio/rpmfusion/new/x264
Uploading: x264-0.148-20160614-a5e06b9.tar.bz2
2016-06-22 22:12 GMT+02:00 Michael Cronenworth :
> Please do not touch Kodi.
>
> Do not commit patches. Do not create a build. Do not collect $200.
>
> I am in the process of updating Kodi to 17 alpha. I do not want a Fedora 24+
Not at all, sir, alpha is way too late for f24 GA, about to be
releas
Richard please use switch -d and -v
rfpkg -d -v new-sources and you will see the error
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
>> > Ok, upload-sources worked for me and I believe everything correct for a
>> build.
>>
>> are
On 22/06/16 23:40, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
Can you please explain a little more your point of view ? and what did
you expect ?
Basically, two things. The first is some decency - this does not
include being called an idiot on the list by you.
The second is some transparency in how this repo
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2016-06-21 18:16 GMT+02:00 Richard Shaw :
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >>
> >> > Ok, upload-sources worked for me and I believe everything correct for
> a
> >> > build.
> >>
> >> are you sure ?
> >
> >
> >
2016-06-22 23:57 GMT+02:00 Michael Cronenworth :
> On 06/22/2016 04:23 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>>
>> Please read again what I've said, I have no issue to backport kodi 17
>> to stable (f24) at some point.
>> There is nothing wrong against updating f24 kodi 16 to 17 18 or
>> whatever. But having
2016-06-21 21:42 GMT+02:00 Julian Sikorski :
> Hello,
>
> it seems that livna does not have packages for Fedora releases beyond
> f21. Can we somehow fix this? Or would it be possible to bring libdvdcss
> into rpm fusion?
Don't know about the reasons anymore why libdvdcss is not in
rpmfusion... Bu
2016-06-20 0:12 GMT+02:00 Nicolas Chauvet :
> Hello,
>
> I just want to say that there is now a minimal version of rfpkg available.
> http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=447
>
> This version (rfpkg-1.23.2-1.fc24 so far) is known to allow:
> - clone
I forgot to say the format for c
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3161
Sérgio Basto changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3161
--- Comment #3 from Yajo 2016-06-21 10:07:21 CEST ---
It would be great then to start Crimson packaging
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are o
Hello,
I just want to say that there is now a minimal version of rfpkg available.
http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=447
This version (rfpkg-1.23.2-1.fc24 so far) is known to allow:
- clone
- push
- few others commands
So contributors should be able to push content to the new i
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3161
--- Comment #5 from Yajo 2016-06-22 09:23:10 CEST ---
Here you have a little explanation and links to more explanation about relation
between the new AMDGPU libre driver and Crimson propietary one, and a link to
download Crimson from amd.com.
h
Hello,
it seems that livna does not have packages for Fedora releases beyond
f21. Can we somehow fix this? Or would it be possible to bring libdvdcss
into rpm fusion?
Best regards,
Julian
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > Ok, upload-sources worked for me and I believe everything correct for a
> build.
>
> are you sure ?
>
Mine didn't show any errors:
$ rfpkg new-sources ~/rpmbuild/mythtv/SOURCES/mythtv-0.28.tar.gz
Uploading: /home/build/rpmbuild/mythtv/SO
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3687
Sérgio Basto changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ser...@serjux.com
See Also|
On 22/06/16 22:42, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
If this is how you are going to treat your contributors then I am
considering dropping my involvement in RPMFusion. You have never been
considerate of my help and continuously belittle me. I do not
appreciate it.
You are certainly not alone
2016-06-22 23:15 GMT+02:00 Alec Leamas :
>
>
> On 22/06/16 22:42, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>>
>>
>> If this is how you are going to treat your contributors then I am
>> considering dropping my involvement in RPMFusion. You have never been
>> considerate of my help and continuously belittle me. I
2016-06-22 22:42 GMT+02:00 Michael Cronenworth :
> On 06/22/2016 03:34 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>>
>> Not at all, sir, alpha is way too late for f24 GA, about to be
>> released just NOW!
>> Also I'm not very pleased with me having to fix your FTBFS kodi
>> package despite the appropriate backport
Ok, upload-sources worked for me and I believe everything correct for a
build.
Is the new infra only good for master and f24? Or can I merge the changes
to the f23 branch as well?
Thanks,
Richard
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3964
--- Comment #14 from MartinKG 2016-06-21 09:55:22 CEST ---
Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/qtav.spec
SRPM URL:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/qtav-1.11.0-0.1git3b418cb.fc24.src.rpm
%changelog
* Tue Jun 2
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3161
Sérgio Basto changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://bugzilla.rpmfusion. |https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.
On 06/22/2016 04:23 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
Please read again what I've said, I have no issue to backport kodi 17
to stable (f24) at some point.
There is nothing wrong against updating f24 kodi 16 to 17 18 or
whatever. But having the repo and upgrade path broken for 23-->24 user
migration is
The error of rfpkg-free -d -v build --target f24-free :
ActionNotAllowed: policy violation (build_from_srpm)
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:52 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hello , with clean rfpkg
>
> rfpkg -d -v new-sources x264-0.148-20160614-a5e06b9.tar.bz2
>
> works !!
>
>
> https://pkgs.rpmfusi
On 06/21/2016 03:48 PM, Mario Blättermann wrote:
> Don't know about the reasons anymore why libdvdcss is not in
> rpmfusion... But if you want to have it, consider to enable the repo
> of Remi Collet:
> http://rpms.famillecollet.com/
Probably because of this: http://www.copyright.gov/fedreg/2015/8
47 matches
Mail list logo
