I think Ralf refers to the rules for games and emulators simply because this is
a game application.
However, IMHO the answer here really depends the type of the database
downloaded from the server. If it's indeed something which can be compared to a
game (as opposed to the game engine) Ralf's
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #9 from Jeremy Newton ---
(In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #8)
> (In reply to Jeremy Newton from comment #7)
> ...
> > I was going to spend some time today to update it, but if this is a blocking
> > issue, I can hold off un
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #8 from Nicolas Chauvet ---
(In reply to Jeremy Newton from comment #7)
...
> I was going to spend some time today to update it, but if this is a blocking
> issue, I can hold off until we can sort it out.
It's not a blocking issue, p
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 2:54 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> A package, which downloads/side-loads stuff from sources out of Fedora and
> operates outside of rpm's control is not acceptable in Fedora (and should
> not be acceptable in RPMFusion, as well).
>
Then why does Fedora package pip, npm, etc
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #7 from Jeremy Newton ---
(In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #5)
> Having a more deep look into your packages, it's seems like you are
> replacing the media sub-package to complement the fedora chromium version.
>
> So it's b
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 2:54 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
>> A package, which downloads/side-loads stuff from sources out of Fedora
> and operates outside of rpm's control is not acceptable in Fedora (and
> should not be acceptable in RPMFusion, as well).
>
Then why are pip, npm, etc. permitted i
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu
--- Comment #6 from R
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Chauvet ---
Having a more deep look into your packages, it's seems like you are replacing
the media sub-package to complement the fedora chromium version.
So it's by design that you "substitute" the fedora -media ver
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mhron...@redhat.com
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Chauvet ---
@jeremy
Any updates on this package ?
I indeed think this would be more appropriate to have the chromium-freeworld
package because:
- it's simpler
- it's assume we try to complement chromium as a whole, n
rfpkg-1.25.1-2 has been patched to work with the new rpkg change
https://github.com/rpmfusion-infra/rfpkg/commit/c2f3b36a8842716269075a03c658d4f8e36aaa55
The fixed build has been pushed to stable
http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/updates/25/x86_64/repoview/rfpkg.html
___
11 matches
Mail list logo
