On Thursday, 22 December 2016 at 05:53, Sérgio Basto wrote:
[...]
> VirtualBox 5.1.12 is released , may I commit it in all branches , with
> this new systemd-detect-virt or not ?
Sorry, I don't have time to look at this in detail before Christmas,
maybe next week. Personally, I still think faili
On Qui, 2016-12-22 at 11:32 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
> On Thursday, 22 December 2016 at 05:53, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > VirtualBox 5.1.12 is released , may I commit it in all branches ,
> > with
> > this new systemd-detect-virt or not ?
> Sorry, I don't have time t
On Qui, 2016-12-22 at 18:24 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Qui, 2016-12-22 at 11:32 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thursday, 22 December 2016 at 05:53, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > [...]
> > >
> > >
> > > VirtualBox 5.1.12 is released , may I commit it in all branches ,
>
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Anyway, in Fedora, we in general mandate "call homes" to be removed and
> mandate packages to be "self-contained".
Yet Fedora happily allows its default browser to use Google's web services
to protect against web sites reported to be malicious by default.
Fedora even ship
