https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5104
--- Comment #10 from mgans...@online.de ---
(In reply to Vitaly Zaitsev from comment #9)
> > but the source code requires qt4
>
> Qt4 is deprecated and no longer supported by upstream. You should avoid it
> because it has lots of known major is
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5268
--- Comment #14 from Benjamin Berg ---
An updated version of thermald is on its way into F30. See:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-2142259d7d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5104
Vitaly Zaitsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vit...@easycoding.org
--- Comment #9 f
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5104
--- Comment #8 from mgans...@online.de ---
Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/glmixer.spec
SRPM URL:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/glmixer-1.7.1914-2.fc30.src.rpm
%changelog
* Fri May 17 2019 Martin Ganss
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5104
--- Comment #7 from mgans...@online.de ---
(In reply to Vasiliy Glazov from comment #6)
> 1. Instead
> %setup -qn GLMixer-%{version}-Source
> %patch0 -p1
>
> use
> %autosetup -p1 -n GLMixer-%{version}-Source
>
> 2. Add
> Requires: hicol
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5104
--- Comment #6 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
1. Instead
%setup -qn GLMixer-%{version}-Source
%patch0 -p1
use
%autosetup -p1 -n GLMixer-%{version}-Source
2. Add
Requires: hicolor-icon-theme
3. Change
%{_libdir}/%{name}/libffgl*.so
to
%{_libd
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5104
Vasiliy Glazov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5104
--- Comment #4 from mgans...@online.de ---
Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/glmixer.spec
SRPM URL:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/glmixer-1.7.1914-1.fc30.src.rpm
%changelog
* Fri May 17 2019 Martin Gans
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5268
--- Comment #13 from Benjamin Berg ---
I am now the owner of the upstream thermald package. It is no longer orphaned
at this point.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.__
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5268
--- Comment #12 from Benjamin Berg ---
Thanks for the review! I updated everything again.
I'll post a comment here once the thermald situation has been clarified.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5163
mgans...@online.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5268
--- Comment #11 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
Spec now is normal but need wait normalisation situation with thermald.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.__
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5268
--- Comment #10 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
Attributes not needed. Remove %attr(0755,root,root)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.__
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5268
--- Comment #9 from Benjamin Berg ---
Done; files on the server have been updated.
I added
%dir %attr(0755,root,root) %{_unitdir}/thermald.service.wants
for the directory.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for t
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5268
--- Comment #8 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
And remove
rm -rf %{buildroot}
from %install section.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug._
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5268
--- Comment #7 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
No known owner of /usr/lib/systemd/system/thermald.service.wants
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.__
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5268
--- Comment #6 from Benjamin Berg ---
Oh, I updated the files in-place. So the old URL is still valid:
https://benjamin.sipsolutions.net/dptfxtract-1.3-1.fc30.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5163
--- Comment #11 from leigh scott ---
processed https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/free/olive.git/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
rpmfusion-developers mail
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5268
--- Comment #5 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
Regenerate SRPM and post link to it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.___
rpmfusion-
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5268
--- Comment #4 from Benjamin Berg ---
Thanks! I update the package with the suggested changes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Hi everyone,
I hope you've heard of the new AskFedora already:
https://ask.fedoraproject.org
While the main goal is to support users, of course, we're also trying to
make users aware of how the community works hoping that this will
convince them to contribute in whatever way (go from merely bein
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5268
--- Comment #3 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
0. Please use %{buildroot} instead of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. And remove "/" in
"/%{_libexecdir}" because this macros already contain it.
1. Remove %clean section.
2. Remove
install -m 644 COPYING $RPM_BUILD_RO
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5163
--- Comment #10 from mgans...@online.de ---
Thanks for reviewing the package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfu
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5268
--- Comment #2 from Benjamin Berg ---
I had not realised that yet.
It looks to me like that could be an error, as dbenoit stepped up to maintain
it last year and is still listed as a co-maintainer. I'll reach out to David
and see what the situa
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5268
Vasiliy Glazov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vasc...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5268
Benjamin Berg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.r
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5268
Bug ID: 5268
Summary: Review request: dptfxtract - Utility to generate a
thermald configuration from DPTF
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: x86_64
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5163
Vasiliy Glazov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #9 from Vas
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5163
--- Comment #8 from mgans...@online.de ---
Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/olive.spec
SRPM URL:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/olive-0.1.0-0.3.20190515git55c5b00.fc30.src.rpm
%changelog
* Fri May 17 2019
29 matches
Mail list logo
