https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6534
Bug ID: 6534
Summary: Review request: icamerasrc - GStreamer plugin for
Intel IPU6
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: x86_64
OS: GNU/Linux
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6491
--- Comment #4 from Kate Hsuan ---
Sepc file update
SPEC:https://github.com/smallorange/ivsc-firmware/raw/main/ivsc-firmware.spec
SRPM:https://github.com/smallorange/ivsc-firmware/releases/download/0.0-2/ivsc-firmware-0.0-2.20221102git29c5eff.f
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
--- Comment #84 from Kevin Kofler ---
Packages with file conflicts are ALWAYS required to have an explicit Conflicts:
tag, otherwise errors like this happen.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.__
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
--- Comment #83 from AsciiWolf ---
By the way, did any one try replacing the package using GUI (GNOME Software or
KDE Discover)? In theory, it should work since this package has AppStream
metadata, but the question is how GNOME Software (KDE Dis
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
--- Comment #82 from Kamil Páral ---
I see, mesa-dri-drivers recommends "mesa-va-drivers(x86-64) = version", and
mesa-va-drivers-freeworld provides it. So if -freeworld is lagging behind, dnf
tries to satisfy the recommends with the Fedora-provi
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
--- Comment #81 from Neal Gompa ---
Provides + Conflicts would make DNF know one or the other must be installed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
rpmfusi
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
--- Comment #80 from Vitaly Zaitsev ---
This is a typical and well-known Fedora vs. RPM Fusion repo desync issue.
Fedora's version was updated and RPM Fusion's doesn't. That's why I don't like
splitting packages between Fedora and RPM Fusion.
On Sat, 2022-12-17 at 17:18 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> On 17/12/2022 15:14, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > Question , shouldn't the update match with Fedora counter part [2]
> > ?
>
> The same for mesa. That's why I don't like splitting packages between
> Fedora and RPM Fusi
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
--- Comment #79 from Kamil Páral ---
Perhaps an explicit "Conflicts: mesa-va-drivers" in mesa-va-drivers-freeworld
would do the job? Can somebody test it?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug._
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
--- Comment #78 from Kamil Páral ---
Folks, I don't think this is working as expected. Weeks ago, I swapped
mesa-va-drivers and mesa-va-drivers-freeworld according to the guide:
https://rpmfusion.org/Howto/Multimedia
But today, a new mesa updat
10 matches
Mail list logo
