Le ven. 10 févr. 2023 à 02:33, Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers
a écrit :
>
> Too late, rpmfusion is branched,
>
> On 08/02/2023 23:13, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
> > On Wed, 2023-02-08 at 12:56 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-
> > developers wrote:
> >> As fedora has
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6359
Nicolas Chauvet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6404
Nicolas Chauvet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30
Bug 30 depends on bug 6404, which changed state.
Bug 6404 Summary: Review request: atomes - An atomistic toolbox
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6404
What|Removed |Added
Too late, rpmfusion is branched,
On 08/02/2023 23:13, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
On Wed, 2023-02-08 at 12:56 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
As fedora has branched already ('or close'), here is the plan for
rpmfusion.
I'm proposing that we skip the
Here's the new list of packages with broken deps.
[leigh@mpd-pc ~]$ sudo repoclosure --releasever rawhide --disablerepo=*
--enablerepo=fedora,rpmfusion-free,rpmfusion-nonfree --check
rpmfusion-free --check rpmfusion-nonfree
Fedora rawhide - x86_64 6.2 MB/s | 66 MB 00:10
RPM Fusion for
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6469
--- Comment #7 from Kate Hsuan ---
Update spec file:
SPEC:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/smallorange/intel-ipu6-akmod/main/intel-ipu6-kmod.spec
SRPM:
Frank Dana via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
> To respond to Kevin, more generally: Removing packages *can *be a
> disservice to users*,* *if there even are any*, but a package simply being
> in the repo does not mean that there are. And every package in the repo,
> no matter how frequently used and
I doubt there is enough freespace left on the harddrive for a mass
rebuild and branching, maybe kwizart can do a cleanup first.
On 08/02/2023 23:13, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
On Wed, 2023-02-08 at 12:56 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
As fedora has
On 2/8/23 12:56, Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
so if anyone can help on fixing theses ?
https://paste.centos.org/view/raw/1d60bfff
The link returns 404
A.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list --
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6468
--- Comment #8 from Kate Hsuan ---
(In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #7)
> We do not do things like this.
>
> It's the point of the virtual provides (kmod-common), it's automatically
> required by intel-ipu6-kmod (that produce the
Hello,
> We are about to branch in a few days, but I would pick this
> opportunity to ask which packages should be retired before branching
> RPM Fusion.
>
> I particularly wonder about nvidia 340xx that was EOL in 2019 but
> 390xx EOL in the end of 2022 would also apply for retirement if no
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
