On 5/22/24 9:15 AM, Michael Cronenworth via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
If there is no quick solution I may disable package verification until this can be
fixed.
I ended up disabling verification until the build hosts can be fixed. Then ran into
a new NodeJS arch specific dependency... but it
On 5/22/24 8:30 AM, Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
I've updated the ca-certificates package from the koji host, but I
don't get why this bundle would be used into the buildroot rather than
the one from the buildroot
I don't get why my resubmit of your same job went later (and st
On 5/22/24 1:06 AM, Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
I'm not sure why the CA from the koji builder host should be used,
compared to the CA of the fedora buildroot populated for the given
target ?
Is this because, in some context, the digicert root ca could only be
provided in the
On 5/21/24 5:27 PM, Frank Dana wrote:
ls -l /etc/pki/ca-trust/extracted/pem/
rpm -vV ca-certificates
I added those commands and the files are definitely being modified.
https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=640941
___
rpmfusion-developers
Hi all,
I am attempting to build Jellyfin 10.9 for Rawhide, but I am running into an
error[1] with dotnet unable to verify the package signatures of the build modules.
The package signatures can be verified on my local system with mock (Rawhide) but
fail on the RPMFusion Koji build hosts.
I
On 5/13/24 12:44 AM, Michael Cronenworth via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
I have pushed the 10.9.1 update for Jellyfin to Rawhide.
Can someone regenerate the rawhide-free metadata? The build is failing due to out of
date metadata.
___
rpmfusion
Hello all,
I have pushed the 10.9.1 update for Jellyfin to Rawhide. I've tested it locally on a
test F40 system and it upgraded from 10.8 without any issues. I have not upgraded my
production system (yet).
Please test it and provide feedback. I plan on upgrading F39/F40 soon. I don't
believe
On 3/18/24 2:29 PM, Michael Cronenworth via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
The update has now been pushed to F40: kodi, kodi-pvr-hdhomerun, and
kodi-inputstream-adaptive have been pushed.
Please update other addons. Some may work without recompiling as not all of the
API requirements changed
On 3/20/24 3:06 AM, Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
Yes, according to groups:
pkgs01 $ groups mooninite
mooninite : mooninite cla_done cla_fpca cla_rpmfusion packager
provenpackager rpmfusionbugs ...
What was the exact error ? are you using the appropriate remote to write to ?
gi
On 3/18/24 2:55 PM, Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
Please do whatever rebuilt is needed, I've just sponsored both of you
to provenpackager to do so.
Thanks for the work on that.
I am trying to push to kodi-inputstream-rtmp or kodi-peripheral-joystick but I am
getting rejected
On 3/18/24 2:55 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
Please do whatever rebuilt is needed, I've just sponsored both of you
to provenpackager to do so.
Thanks for the work on that.
Thanks, Nicolas. I'll work on them as time allows.___
rpmfusion-developers maili
On 3/16/24 3:21 PM, Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
Thanks for rising theses. It looks good points for updating by default then...
The update has now been pushed to F40: kodi, kodi-pvr-hdhomerun, and
kodi-inputstream-adaptive have been pushed.
Please update other addons. Some
On 3/14/24 2:02 AM, Tomasz Torcz via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
This is very suprising to me. I was under impression GNOME/Wayland is
a long way away from any HDR capabilities. KDE Plasma 6 is supposed to
have some rudimentary support.
How does this work? And what's the line with "GBM win
On 3/13/24 3:37 PM, Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
I see little point to update Kodi to a New version for F40 unless WE are sure that
no regression occured ... Specially not until thé full set of Kodi modules are
fully validated
Not having newer Kodi in F40 means having a wa
On 3/12/24 1:30 PM, Michael Cronenworth via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
I have the kodi, kodi-inputstream-adaptive, and pvr.hdhomerun changes queued up
and ready to commit to F40+. I'll commit them in a few hours unless there are
objections.
The update has been pushed to Rawhide (F41
On 3/12/24 3:36 AM, Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
+1 for new kodi for f40+, maybe f39 can be added later.
-1 for adding GLES
I have the kodi, kodi-inputstream-adaptive, and pvr.hdhomerun changes queued up and
ready to commit to F40+. I'll commit them in a few hours unless there
Hi all,
Kodi 21 has its first release candidate now available.
Key features:
- HDR (It works, I've tested it!)
- Better Pipewire support
- Works better with FFMpeg 6 / Python 3.12+
Requirements:
- Addon rebuilds (such as Inputstream Adaptive)
- Compile time only requirement on apache-groovy (bi
On 8/3/23 9:15 PM, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
Failed builds: 17
I think that low number is pretty impressive. Thanks, Sérgio.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an em
On 3/27/23 12:34 PM, Mohamed El Morabity wrote:
Hello Michael,
the "Provides" was present since this library was bundled:
https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/free/kodi-inputstream-adaptive.git/tree/kodi-inputstream-adaptive.spec#n33
Apologies, I was just looking at the commit message. :(
Thanks f
On 3/27/23 5:59 AM, Mohamed ElMorabity wrote:
+SHA512 (Bento4-1.6.0-639-6-Nexus.tar.gz) =
08c359fb75f42d095ae040fb4dff020c902ba24677a95360fb845245ba3881423961bff6c8f0d2a791d387aa58ebe50b4998bedb866e0b7b58321bf8cdd4b1c3
Can you add a "Provides" line to declare this C++ library has been added?
On 1/27/23 11:29 AM, Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
You dropped the annobin fix when you rebased.
Fixed.
Thanks. It built successfully on x86 so I assumed it wasn't needed any longer. I
will add a note to the patch that it is required for ARM.
__
On 1/17/23 11:14 AM, Michael Cronenworth via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
The ARM build failed with a strange linker failure. Is the ARM builder out of disk
space?
Storage:
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/vda2 127G 7.9G 114G 7% /
I guess it isn't a disk
On 1/16/23 10:09 PM, Michael Cronenworth via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
Can someone kick off a newRepo task for f38-free-build?
Kodi 20.0 was released today and the build is pending for Rawhide.
Thanks, Nicholas, I have fixed the build and x86_64 is successfully building.
The ARM build
Hi,
Can someone kick off a newRepo task for f38-free-build?
Kodi 20.0 was released today and the build is pending for Rawhide.
Thanks,
Michael
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an ema
On 1/13/23 1:55 PM, Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
Seems like the patch has landed in master (but not in 22.6.6).
Can you apply the patch in fedora branches (and eventually update
22.6.6 in rawhide only for now).
I've added you as co-maintainer, it should be live in the next 12 h
25 matches
Mail list logo
