Best regards,
>
> On 05/08/2024 15:39, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Mass rebuild for F39 is finished .
> >
> > you may see updated list here:
> > https://www.serjux.com/rpms/failed_to_build.html
> >
> >
Hi,
Mass rebuild for F39 is finished .
you may see updated list here:
https://www.serjux.com/rpms/failed_to_build.html
Failed builds: 17
Package: deadbeef
Package: dega-sdl
Package: dosemu
Package: dvd95
Package: freeguide
Package: gambatte
Package: gens
Hi,
Mass rebuild for F39 is finished .
you may see updated list here:
https://www.serjux.com/rpms/failed_to_build.html
Failed builds: 17
Package: deadbeef
Package: dega-sdl
Package: dosemu
Package: dvd95
Package: freeguide
Package: gambatte
Package: gens
On Sat, 2024-01-06 at 05:31 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> smplayer is moving to Fedora
>
>
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256940
Hi,
smplayer was build for Fedora 39+, F38 is almost EOL so it was skipped.
and also built smplayer for EPEL 9. Fedora EPEL 8 a
I happily announce that RPM Fusion Fedora 40 is General Available (GA).
Thank you all that make it happen .
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
And in F40 ? compat-ffmpeg5 will be dropped also ?
On Sat, 2024-03-23 at 13:00 +0100, Leigh Scott wrote:
> commit b9f004a649292480fd6649f0123ca275b4cad6f1
> Author: Leigh Scott
> Date: Sat Mar 23 12:00:56 2024 +
>
> No longer needed
>
> .gitignore | 2 -
>
missing in Fedora and CMake wants
> to
> download them during RPM build.
> - In Fedora 41+, EmptyEpsilon actives experimental code of GLM-1.0.1;
> so, we need to bundle GLM-0.9.9.8
> - EmptyEpsilon looks running fine in Fedora 39 x86_64
>
> Do you want to try it before commit
icamerasrc
Package: jellyfin
Package: lha
Package: lxdream
Package: lxdvdrip
Package: mamory
Package: mate-applet-streamer
Package: swftools
Package: tilem
Package: x264
On Sat, 2024-03-09 at 19:31 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> I lost all recent mail about this sub
I lost all recent mail about this subject and also
https://lists.rpmfusion.org/archives/list/rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org/2024/1/
F40 Mass rebuild in RPM Fusion original message is from 2024-01-25
https://www.mail-archive.com/rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org/msg27581.html
I
On Mon, 2024-03-04 at 08:22 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> I don't think you can revert to such an older version that way and
> still assume spotify to still work.
> Better not to support el8 for spotify, unless you can get a copr
> repository with the needed deps.
>
It works, I tested first .
Hi,
I happily announce that RPMFusion f40 branch is ready to use
if you find any problem, please let us know.
Happy hacking,
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an
, repo = f40-free
Package: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia, repo = f40-nonfree
On Thu, 2024-01-25 at 12:37 +, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-01-25 at 09:46 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-
> developers wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > As the m
On Thu, 2024-01-25 at 09:46 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> As the mass rebuild is currently occurring in fedora we'd better wait
> for it's publication , also there are probably some pending ABI
> update
> in fedora side waiting for the mass rebuilt to
it is an known bug , you need an old koji client , I use centos 7 vm
or apply this [1] on /usr/lib/python3.11/site-
packages/koji_cli/commands.py
[1]
https://pagure.io/koji/pull-request/3889#request_diff
On Tue, 2024-01-09 at 10:13 +, Martin Gansser via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
>
smplayer is moving to Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256940
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hi Emmanuel ,
Please add me to bugzilla components:
- lpf-cleartype-fonts
- lpf-mscore-fonts
- lpf-mscore-tahoma-fonts
- lpf-spotify-client
- discord
I missed lpf-spotify and discord bug reports
Thank you,
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
I think we will need vlc-freeworld
# codecs which cannot be shipped in Fedora proper
%bcond freeworld 0
%bcond faad2 %{with freeworld}
%bcond x264 %{with freeworld}
%bcond x265 %{with freeworld}
On Fri, 2023-12-15 at 10:30 +0100, Leigh Scott wrote:
> commit
esktop.
>
> вс, 19 нояб. 2023 г., 16:32 Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers
> :
> >
> > dnf install telegram-desktop
> >
> > Error:
> > Problem: problem with installed package qadwaitadecorations-qt6-
> > 0.1.3-
> > 2.fc38.x86_64
>
dnf install telegram-desktop
Error:
Problem: problem with installed package qadwaitadecorations-qt6-0.1.3-
2.fc38.x86_64
- package qadwaitadecorations-qt6-0.1.3-2.fc38.x86_64 from @System
requires libQt6Core.so.6(Qt_6.6)(64bit), but none of the providers can
be installed
- package
Hello,
I happily announce that RPM Fusion Fedora 39 is General Available (GA).
Thank you all that make it happen .
Best regards,
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an
you need use koji version of centos 7 i.e. rpmfusion needs one older
koji client version
please check is this is the fix [1] can be completely unrelated ...
https://pagure.io/koji/pull-request/3889
On Sat, 2023-10-28 at 19:03 +0200, Michal Schorm via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> I tried
Thank you Dominik, for being understanding and for all the information.
OK I see the purpose
On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 12:35 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski via
rpmfusion-developers wrote:
> On Friday, 01 September 2023 at 12:07, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-
> developers wrote:
Hi,
https://admin.rpmfusion.org/pkgdb/package/free/wxsvg/
as you can see I'm the main maintainer of this package, why in Fedora I
just have commit permissions ?
I don't mind that you move things to Fedora , if you maintain it ,
which is not the case. As far as I know wxsvg is only used by
On Tue, 2023-08-29 at 17:21 +0100, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-08-29 at 18:08 +0200, Sergio Pascual via rpmfusion-
> developers wrote:
> > Hello, I requested a new branch for nonfree/pgplot a few months
> > ago
> > by cl
On Tue, 2023-08-29 at 18:08 +0200, Sergio Pascual via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> Hello, I requested a new branch for nonfree/pgplot a few months ago
> by clicking a button in https://admin.rpmfusion.org/pkgdb, but it
> still says "awaiting for review".
>
> Is there a newer method for
On Fri, 2023-08-25 at 15:26 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski via
rpmfusion-developers wrote:
> I ran rfpkg retire on master branch
> and opened https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6753 to
> retire
> in pkgdb
I fixed rfpkg in PR [1] to allow retire packages in pkgdb , of course,
On Wed, 2023-08-16 at 15:41 +, Andrew Bauer wrote:
> but mock fails because the openh264 repos for rawhide are returning
> http 404. I'll give it some time to settle then will try again later.
but is a problem of mock repos configuration or mirrors ?
from mock configuration [1] we got
ok , I will try not forget check this one also , I checked that f39
mirrors are working but f38 is the one that got broken :)
On Thu, 2023-08-17 at 10:51 +0200, Adrian Reber via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 08:13:47AM +0200, Ralf Corsépius via
> rpmfusion-developers
Just resend it , because the late email was delivered 3 days later
Delivery-Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2023 21:07:43 +0100
On Fri, 2023-08-11 at 12:52 +0100, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the RPMFusion f39 branch is ready and also mass rebuild was done and
> is
Hi,
the RPMFusion f39 branch is ready and also mass rebuild was done and is
completed.
if you find any problem, please let us know.
Happy hacking
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To
Done.
On Fri, 2023-08-11 at 17:41 +, Andrew Bauer wrote:
> gsview has been fixed locally.
>
> Sergio - Would you please grant me access to build this package.
> Thank you.
>
> Thanks,
> Andy
>
> From: Sérgio Basto
> Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2023 9:31 AM
&
On Mon, 2023-08-07 at 14:15 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Thank you
>
> https://www.serjux.com/rpms/failed_to_build.html updated
Last run: 2023-08-11 10:36:15.410784 UTC
Failed builds: 2
Package: gsview
Package: telegram-desktop
Packages not built: 1
Package: chromium-
gt; Get Outlook for Android
>
> From: Sérgio Basto
> Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2023 7:39:27 AM
> To: RPM Fusion developers discussion list
>
> Cc: Andrew Bauer
> Subject: Re: Mass rebuild results for F39
>
>
>
> is unblocked now, should work now , please resubmit i
a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
>
> From: Sérgio Basto
> Sent: Monday, August 7, 2023 3:01 PM
> To: RPM Fusion developers discussion list develop...@lists.rpmfusion.org>
> Cc: Andrew Bauer
> Subject: Re: Mass rebuild results for F39
>
> I added
a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
>
> From: Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers develop...@lists.rpmfusion.org>
> Sent: Monday, August 7, 2023 8:15 AM
> To: RPM Fusion developers discussion list develop...@lists.rpmfusion.org>
> Cc: Vascom ; Sérgio
via rpmfusion-developers
wrote:
> Motion build fixed.
>
> сб, 5 авг. 2023 г. в 14:47, Vascom :
> >
> > Motion fix on the way.
> > May be 2-3 days.
> >
> > пт, 4 авг. 2023 г., 05:16 Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers
> > :
> > >
&
Hi,
Mass rebuild for F39 is complete .
And we have this failures :
https://www.serjux.com/rpms/failed_to_build.html
Failed builds: 17
Package: EmptyEpsilon
Package: audacity-freeworld
Package: cannonball
Package: d1x
Package: deadbeef
Package: freeguide
Package:
On Sat, 2023-07-08 at 18:10 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski via
rpmfusion-developers wrote:
> On Saturday, 08 July 2023 at 14:59, Petr Menšík wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > tried to rebuild it on f38. It failed to start in default
> > configuration:
> >
> > čec 08 14:45:00 pemensik-t460
-kimageformats-5.107.0-2.fc39
krita-5.1.5-3.fc39
SDL2_image-2.6.3-2.fc39
seamonkey-2.53.16-2.fc39
vips-8.13.3-8.fc39
webkitgtk-2.41.5-3.fc39
xine-lib-1.2.13-6.fc39
On Fri, 2023-06-16 at 14:50 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm going do a sidetag this weekend I will rebuild the 15
>
Hi,
I'm going do a sidetag this weekend I will rebuild the 15 dependencies
[1] let me know, if you know of any impediment.
Thank you
[1]
Depending on: jpegxl (15)
ImageMagick (maintained by: dcavalca, epel-packagers-sig, kalev, luya,
ngompa, remi, salimma, sergiomb)
=6692
>
The bug was opened today
>
> Upstream is virtually dead.
>
>
> https://git.ffmpeg.org/gitweb/mplayer.git/shortlog
>
Thank you for the tip
> On 30/05/2023 11:09, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
> > 2022-02-27, Sunday :: MPlayer 1.5 released
2022-02-27, Sunday :: MPlayer 1.5 released , I take it
On Tue, 2023-05-30 at 11:16 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski via
rpmfusion-developers wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I decided to orphan mplayer as I haven't used it for years. Feel free
> to
> pick it up.
>
> Regards,
> Dominik
> --
> Fedora
On Sun, 2023-03-19 at 19:43 +0100, Robert-André Mauchin via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> On 3/19/23 12:56, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > BTW add me (sergiomb) as co-maintainer (admin) for built libjxl for
> > EPEL 8
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=21708
BTW add me (sergiomb) as co-maintainer (admin) for built libjxl for
EPEL 8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2170821
On Sun, 2023-03-19 at 10:18 +0100, Robert-André Mauchin via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am planning a soname bump of jpegxl to 0.8.1 next week
On Thu, 2023-03-02 at 19:17 +, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-03-02 at 19:37 +0100, Karel Volný via rpmfusion-
> developers
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to retire qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld
> >
> > So I
On Thu, 2023-03-02 at 19:37 +0100, Karel Volný via rpmfusion-developers
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to retire qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld
>
> So I have followed
> https://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#Retiring_a_package
>
> But trying rfpkg retire, I got
>
> [kvolny@kvolny
//github.com/rpmfusion-infra/rpmfusion-tools/blob/master/mass-rebuild.py#L33
>
> On 19/02/2023 22:41, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I spent this weekend understanding why when update my vm to F38
> > branched I got a lot of [1] the
Hi,
I spent this weekend understanding why when update my vm to F38
branched I got a lot of [1] the key ID d651ff2e is "our" key RPM-GPG-
KEY-rpmfusion-free-fedora-2020
For an introduction to this topic I recommend this 2 articles [2] .
In resume rpm sign with SHA1 aren't installed in F38
>
> On 10/02/2023 12:03, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
> > On Fri, 2023-02-10 at 08:45 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-
> > developers wrote:
> > > Le ven. 10 févr. 2023 à 02:33, Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-
> > > developers
&g
On Fri, 2023-02-10 at 08:45 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> Le ven. 10 févr. 2023 à 02:33, Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers
> a écrit :
> >
> > Too late, rpmfusion is branched,
> >
> > On 08/02/2023 23:13, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-
On Wed, 2023-02-08 at 12:56 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> As fedora has branched already ('or close'), here is the plan for
> rpmfusion.
>
> I'm proposing that we skip the mass-rebuild this time.
I can do the mass-rebuild this weekend
> The Main reason is, we are
Hi,
I did a wiki page where have instructions how tunneling matrix user to
access to #rpmfusion on Libera.Chat
https://rpmfusion.org/Howto/Matrix%20tunneling
the most complicated is register your user on IRC Nickserver because
#rpmfusion channel only accept registered users
Happy hacking !
On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 17:34 -0600, Richard Shaw via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 5:29 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 23:25 +0000, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-
> > developers wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 17:10 -0600,
On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 23:25 +, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 17:10 -0600, Richard Shaw via rpmfusion-
> developers wrote:
> > I tried a scratch build on RPM Fusion which I haven't done in some
> > time and was greeted with the following
On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 17:10 -0600, Richard Shaw via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> I tried a scratch build on RPM Fusion which I haven't done in some
> time and was greeted with the following:
>
> $ rfpkg scratch-build --srpm
>
> setting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1673913600
> Wrote:
On Tue, 2023-01-10 at 20:05 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I wonder if some contributors (/endusers) would rely on RPM Fusion
> for
> CentOS Stream ?
I only use CentOS Stream, to my tests, in a vm. I haven't had the need
to use it for my work yet
> Some time ago I did the heavy
On Sat, 2022-12-17 at 17:18 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> On 17/12/2022 15:14, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > Question , shouldn't the update match with Fedora counter part [2]
> > ?
>
> The same for mesa. That's why I don't like splitting packages bet
Hi,
I saw this update on repology [1]
Question , shouldn't the update match with Fedora counter part [2] ?
[1]
https://repology.org/project/pipewire/versions
[2]
https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/pipewire/pipewire/
On Sat, 2022-12-17 at 12:34 +0100, Leigh Scott wrote:
> Summary of
On Wed, 2022-12-14 at 17:15 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-12-14 at 17:57 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> > Le mer. 14 déc. 2022 à 12:42, Sérgio M. Basto
> > a écrit :
> > >
> > > commit 7faa5ed40864b93ef5fb54e223701856db38ad5f
> > > Author:
On Wed, 2022-12-14 at 17:57 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Le mer. 14 déc. 2022 à 12:42, Sérgio M. Basto
> a écrit :
> >
> > commit 7faa5ed40864b93ef5fb54e223701856db38ad5f
> > Author: Sérgio M. Basto
> > Date: Wed Dec 14 11:38:33 2022 +
> >
> > we should restart vboxdrv just after
On Wed, 2022-12-07 at 11:58 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> I'm regenerating the repo and I will fire the build after ok ?
:P , perl-XML-TreePP is not yet in stable, was sent to stable but is
not yet published
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-69649340de
> On Wed
I'm regenerating the repo and I will fire the build after ok ?
On Wed, 2022-12-07 at 04:39 +0100, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> Summary of changes:
>
> 1905f87... Update to xmltv 1.1.2 release (*)
> aa0923e... Perl 5.36 rebuild (*)
> 7bb7289... - Rebuilt for
>
On Thu, 2022-12-01 at 07:19 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can someone kick off a refresh of the external repo cache for both
> F36 and F37 in Koji?
>
> The dotnet packages were updated yesterday to finally let me build
> out the newest
> version of Jellyfin.
done , I also
On Sat, 2022-11-12 at 18:37 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> - smplayer
smplayer use mpv by comand line , rebuild won't change anything of
smplayer
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list --
On Sun, 2022-11-06 at 00:10 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-10-06 at 17:25 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > - It will also provide a means to complement the fedora ffmpeg-
> > > free
> > > one from the same package (and to not require a dedicated build,
>
On Thu, 2022-10-06 at 17:25 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > - It will also provide a means to complement the fedora ffmpeg-free
> > one from the same package (and to not require a dedicated build,
> > maintenance).
>
> So we only need libavcodec_freeworld to complemen
Hi,
Packages are available for test in copr
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sergiomb/vboxfor23/
dnf copr enable sergiomb/vboxfor23
VirtualBox 7 needs a new version of kBuild which is on testing [1] just
after kbuild be on updates stable we will be able to build VBox on
RPMFusion.
Forwarded Message
From: Zoltan Hanko
To: sergi...@rpmfusion.org
Subject: Fwd: fedora 35 nvidia rpms under 515.x
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 20:24:06 +0200
Hi,
Earlier I requested help regarding an earlier Nvidia driver to my
Fedora 35 that stopped working for Da Vinci Resolve SW
On Fri, 2022-10-07 at 14:03 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
> On Thursday, 06 October 2022 at 18:25, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Wed, 2022-09-28 at 17:16 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> > > Forwarded as a dedicated topic:
> > >
> &g
On Wed, 2022-09-28 at 17:16 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Forwarded as a dedicated topic:
>
> -- Forwarded message -
> [ ... ]
>
> On my side I want to rework the ffmpeg package to get back to normal
> (so conflicts with fedora will be restored) and only drop a
> libavcodec
>
Hi,
mock --root have new names for RPMFusion , while still be backward
compatible, mock-core-configs package as you may notice due Centos
Stream and his replacements like Alma and Rocky adopt new root names .
Also to work with copr is necessary or patch the copr or adapt names to
what copr
On Tue, 2022-09-27 at 13:18 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> %ifarch x86_64 ppc64le aarch64
> +%if ! 0%{?fedora} >= 37
> %global _with_asdcp 1
> %endif
> +%endif
you need use parentheses
as you wrote is groupped
%if (! 0%{?fedora}) >=37
and is always false
you need parentheses like
you are making one override on Fedora to build on rpmfusion ? this
won't work see
https://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#Requesting_a_buildroot_override_but_for_one_package_from_Fedora
in a few hours mlt-7.8.0 should be pushed to stable ...
On Mon, 2022-09-26 at 10:18 +,
I'm waiting for mlt 7.8.0 lands in stable ,
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-8ca4b62f83
On Mon, 2022-09-26 at 11:43 +0200, Martin Gansser wrote:
> Summary of changes:
>
> 52e6cda... Update to 22.04.25 (*)
> a30e146... Update to 22.06.07 (*)
> 1d57b4c... Add libdir
On Sat, 2022-09-03 at 22:27 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Le sam. 3 sept. 2022 à 03:51, Sérgio Basto a
> écrit :
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like that you notice we have a kmods SIG on Centos
> > (https://sigs.centos.org/kmods/) which
> > is a continuati
Hi,
I'd like that you notice we have a kmods SIG on Centos
(https://sigs.centos.org/kmods/) which
is a continuation of http://elrepo.org/ (that already use
one modified version of kmodtool) the kabi and weak-modules runs well
and more important alone it is autonomous does everything alone
we
On Sat, 2022-08-20 at 18:29 +0200, sagit...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> On 8/20/22 5:29 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> > Le sam. 20 août 2022 à 15:13, sagitter a
> > écrit :
> > >
> > > commit ecb20ec407a7f64d003319d92cb922fe8a863183
> > > Author: Antonio Trande
> > > Date: Sat Aug 20 15:13:13
Hello,
does anyone know the answer to this ?
Forwarded Message
From: Zoltan Hanko
To: sergi...@rpmfusion.org
Subject: fedora 35 nvidia rpms under 515.x
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2022 17:24:56 +0200
Hi Sérgio,
I was always used rpmfusion repo to add nvidia driver to my fc35.
Today
On Sun, 2022-06-26 at 15:07 +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> In summary
>
> > curlew: done
> > devedeng: done
> > ffmulticonverter: done
> > flowblade: done
> > gr-dab: done
> > kodi: done
> > ldoce5viewer: done
> > libopenshot: done
> > mopidy-spotify: TO RETIRE until rust backend is ready?
On Sat, 2022-06-25 at 21:52 +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> On 6/25/22 21:05, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> > On 6/25/22 11:45, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> > > On 6/24/22 18:14, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> > > > Le ven. 24 juin 2022 à 12:48, Miro Hrončok
> > > > a écrit :
> > > > >
> > > > >
on a very quick read, i think we need to do a perl mass rebuild for
rawhide
--
Sérgio M. B.
--- Begin Message ---
There are a lot of dependency problems in rawhide after a large update
a few days ago. I'm attaching the list in case anyone is interested in
pursuing them at this early date.
at 09:19 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Please remind that you can use a side tag, Ask Leigh if anything
>
> Le lun. 6 juin 2022, 23:34, Sérgio Basto a
> écrit :
> > Hi,
> > I going start to build x264 0.164 on rawhide (with soname bump).
> >
> > Pleas
Hi,
I going start to build x264 0.164 on rawhide (with soname bump).
Please let me know if we have any concern
Thank you ,
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an
Hi,
have you checked [1] ? I use "ulimit -n 4096" (
https://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/sergiomb/electrons/nodejs-electron.git/tree/nodejs-electron.spec
)
but I can't install it [2]
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MemoryConstraintsMacros
On Sun, 2022-05-15 at 22:18 +0100, Barry wrote:
>
>
> > On 15 May 2022, at 15:28, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 2022-05-15 at 09:53 +0100, Barry Scott wrote:
> > >
> > > On 14/05/2022 10:47, Barry Scott wrote:
> > >
>
On Sun, 2022-05-15 at 09:53 +0100, Barry Scott wrote:
>
> On 14/05/2022 10:47, Barry Scott wrote:
>
> >
> > I had a working f35 with the rpmfusion nvidia drivers.
> > After upgade to f36 the nvidia-fallback.service reports that the
> > nvidia
> > driver is missing and mod probes nouveau.
> > I
Hello,
I happily announce that RPM Fusion Fedora 36 is General Available (GA).
Thank you all that make it happen .
Best regards,
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an
On Mon, 2022-04-18 at 13:23 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
> before start I'd like state
> First , I still don't have an formed opinion on this subject.
sorry the subject I was talking about is ffmpeg-free vs ffmpeg-full (I
haven't formed my opinion yet about ffmpeg-free vs ff
Hi,
before start I'd like state
First , I still don't have an formed opinion on this subject.
Second, I'm not defending anyone.
I saw that you still admin of ffmpeg and I think this is more a
symbolic thing , maybe a little childish, even , so moving on .
Now , indeed is good opportunity to
On Sat, 2022-02-12 at 22:20 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-02-10 at 11:33 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > Hi,
> > we are preparing compat-ffmpeg4 based on ffmpeg 4.3
> >
> > meanwhile mass rebuild was done and have this failures :
> >
>
> I
OK, I will be more careful next time
I synced xpra-codecs-freeworld with xpra and updated el8 , f34 , f35,
f36 and f37
Thank you
On Fri, 2022-02-18 at 15:53 +0100, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
> Sérgio, xpra-4.3.2 is not in fedora stable branches.
> These updates should not be pushed in
On Thu, 2022-02-10 at 11:33 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
> we are preparing compat-ffmpeg4 based on ffmpeg 4.3
>
> meanwhile mass rebuild was done and have this failures :
>
Information on
https://www.serjux.com/rpms/failed_to_build.html
is updated , find_failures.py
On Thu, 2022-02-10 at 16:26 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > You skipped kodi, which is currently built against ffmpeg-4.4.
I found the mystery, kodi have the file noautobuild in the repo, which
mass-rebuild.py script respects.
BTW the list of the packages with noautobuilds :
./fre
On Thu, 2022-02-10 at 07:51 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 2/10/22 5:33 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > meanwhile mass rebuild was done
>
> You skipped kodi, which is currently built against ffmpeg-4.4. Do you
> need me to
> kick off a rebuild or are you
Hi,
we are preparing compat-ffmpeg4 based on ffmpeg 4.3
meanwhile mass rebuild was done and have this failures :
https://www.serjux.com/rpms/failed_to_build.html
Best regards,
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list --
I'm working in a new script to compute dependencies based on
https://pagure.io/releng/blob/main/f/scripts/find_unblocked_orphans.py
so running find_unblocked_orphans.py --max_deps 1 --skip-orphans libvpx
I got this results :
Depending on: libvpx (26),
HandBrake (maintained by: )
On Wed, 2022-01-19 at 13:34 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 1/9/22 9:36 AM, nore...@rpmfusion.org wrote:
> > RPM Fusion update report
> >
> > ...
> > mpv-0.34.1-1.fc35
> >
>
> What happened to this update? This fixes the OpenGL context that is
> opened, which
>
Hi,
Can someone review the package python-ffmpeg-progress-yield ? , it was
generated with pyp2rpm-3.3.4 , so it is very trivial review
I return I can review something.
Thank you
Spec URL: https://www.serjux.com/rpms/python-ffmpeg-progress-yield.spec
SRPM URL:
Just a clarification , we are working on have epel and epel-next for
release 9 .
On Sat, 2021-12-25 at 18:17 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-12-24 at 23:20 +, admin.tsurobilt wrote:
> > Are there plans to release configurations for RHEL 9 beta on
> > rpmfusion
On Fri, 2021-12-24 at 23:20 +, admin.tsurobilt wrote:
> Are there plans to release configurations for RHEL 9 beta on
> rpmfusion?
yes of course , work still in progress
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list --
1 - 100 of 1250 matches
Mail list logo
