https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
AsciiWolf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@asciiwolf.com
--- Comment #31 from Asc
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
--- Comment #30 from to...@bllue.org ---
that's my fault, missed version 4. this builds fine, but I think it's better
to use the convention of changing
%global with_omx 0
to either:
#global with_omx 0
or an explicit:
%undefine with_omx
f
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
--- Comment #29 from Luya Tshimbalanga ---
(In reply to toppk from comment #27)
> This is missing BuildRequires: libomxil-bellagio-devel
That was from the old spec file. I uploaded the new version with disabled
oxml.See comment #13 for the rati
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
--- Comment #28 from to...@bllue.org ---
sorry, taking a closer look, the opposite of
%global with_omx 1
is
%undefine with_omx
as the relevant spec line:
-Dgallium-omx=%{?with_omx:bellagio}%{!?with_omx:disabled} \
only checks if the ma
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
to...@bllue.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||to...@bllue.org
--- Comment #27 from t
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
--- Comment #26 from Luya Tshimbalanga ---
Updated
SPEC: https://www.thefinalzone.net/packages/mesa-freeworld.spec
SRPM:
https://www.thefinalzone.net/packages/mesa-freeworld-22.2.0-4.fc37.src.rpm
Added missing licenses and trim lines.
--
You
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
--- Comment #25 from Maxwell G ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #24)
> (In reply to Maxwell G from comment #23)
> > (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #22)
> > > (In reply to Maxwell G from comment #21)
> > > > If suggesting "dnf insta
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
--- Comment #24 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Maxwell G from comment #23)
> (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #22)
> > (In reply to Maxwell G from comment #21)
> > > If suggesting "dnf install --allowerasing mesa-va-drivers-freeworld" isn'
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
--- Comment #23 from Maxwell G ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #22)
> (In reply to Maxwell G from comment #21)
> > If suggesting "dnf install --allowerasing mesa-va-drivers-freeworld" isn't
> > workable, I can think of a couple other so
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
--- Comment #22 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Maxwell G from comment #21)
> If suggesting "dnf install --allowerasing mesa-va-drivers-freeworld" isn't
> workable, I can think of a couple other solutions. I don't think any of
> these are ideal
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
--- Comment #21 from Maxwell G ---
If suggesting "dnf install --allowerasing mesa-va-drivers-freeworld" isn't
workable, I can think of a couple other solutions. I don't think any of these
are ideal, but there's not much else we can do.
One solu
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
--- Comment #20 from leigh scott ---
(In reply to Luya Tshimbalanga from comment #12)
> Updated SPEC and SRPM. Release remains unchanged.
>
> SPEC: https://www.thefinalzone.net/packages/mesa-freeworld.spec
> SRPM:
> https://www.thefinalzone.ne
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
--- Comment #19 from Neal Gompa ---
Could we make the -freeworld package upgrade the regular one?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
--- Comment #18 from Nicolas Chauvet ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #17)
...
> Well, "dnf swap" / "dnf install --allowerasing" would work for this purpose.
This is unlikely a simple solution as in "just install a specific package from
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
--- Comment #17 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #16)
> Any solution on the previous issue ?
>
> There is a need to either have a conflict mesa-va-drivers or to implement
> alternatives so both version can coexists.
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
--- Comment #16 from Nicolas Chauvet ---
Any solution on the previous issue ?
There is a need to either have a conflict mesa-va-drivers or to implement
alternatives so both version can coexists.
If the mesa-va-drivers is enforced and installed
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
--- Comment #15 from Nicolas Chauvet ---
FYI, I've a problem with this libva updates initially proposed here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-494754fe0f
One of the side effect is that it will Recommends mesa-vaapi-backend (b
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
--- Comment #14 from Luya Tshimbalanga ---
(In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #13)
> (In reply to Luya Tshimbalanga from comment #0)
> > SPEC: https://www.thefinalzone.net/packages/mesa-freeworld.spec
> I can't see the spec file, it's red
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
--- Comment #13 from Nicolas Chauvet ---
(In reply to Luya Tshimbalanga from comment #0)
> SPEC: https://www.thefinalzone.net/packages/mesa-freeworld.spec
I can't see the spec file, it's redirected to wordpress-ru... (srpm is fine)
(In reply to
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
--- Comment #12 from Luya Tshimbalanga ---
Updated SPEC and SRPM. Release remains unchanged.
SPEC: https://www.thefinalzone.net/packages/mesa-freeworld.spec
SRPM:
https://www.thefinalzone.net/packages/mesa-freeworld-22.2.0-3.fc37.src.rpm
The
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
--- Comment #11 from Petr Menšík ---
Just another note. I think it would be good relaxing requirement of filesystem
from:
%{srcname}-filesystem-freeworld%{?_isa} =
%{?epoch:%{epoch}:}%{version}-%{release}
to:
%{srcname}-filesystem%{?_isa} >= %{
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
--- Comment #10 from Petr Menšík ---
Seems good to me.
Could we perhaps add one or two sentences to exported packages %description and
state how this package differs from original fedora's package? It contains just
%{summary}.
For example:
Con
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
--- Comment #9 from Luya Tshimbalanga ---
Thanks Petr for checking.Following the suggestion, both vdpau and omx are
re-enabled.
Also Fedora mesa renamed vaapi to va leading to update below.
SPEC: https://www.thefinalzone.net/packages/mesa-freew
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
Petr Menšík changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pemen...@redhat.com
--- Comment #8 from P
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
--- Comment #6 from Luya Tshimbalanga ---
Yes, I just noticed the commit change from main repository and added to both
spec and srpm. No release change from submitted files above.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
--- Comment #7 from Thorsten Leemhuis ---
/me taps mic to check if it's still on, because he hasn't commented on any bug
in this bug-tracker for a very long time…
(In reply to Luya Tshimbalanga from comment #2)
> SRPM:
> https://www.thefinalzon
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
joe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||grum...@fedoraproject.org
--- Comment #5 from joe
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
--- Comment #4 from Luya Tshimbalanga ---
True. Fortunately the spec file excluded "for AMD hardware" so no impact.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.__
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
--- Comment #2 from Luya Tshimbalanga ---
Good catch. Here is the update
SPEC: https://www.thefinalzone.net/packages/mesa-freeworld.spec
SRPM:
https://www.thefinalzone.net/packages/mesa-freeworld-22.2.0-2.fc37.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
Kevin Kofler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kevin.kof...@chello.at
--- Comment #3 fr
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
--- Comment #1 from leigh scott ---
Autospec doesn't work on rpmfusion infra.
%autochangelog
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
leigh scott changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||leigh123li...@gmail.com
Block
101 - 132 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
