On 27.10.2008 21:48, Chris Nolan wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 27.10.2008 12:15, Chris Nolan wrote:
As an end user I find that slightly confusing to have so many
different permutations. I would find it less confusing to do your
original way and drop the "hybrid" altogether:
"kmod-wl" fo
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 27.10.2008 12:15, Chris Nolan wrote:
As an end user I find that slightly confusing to have so many
different permutations. I would find it less confusing to do your
original way and drop the "hybrid" altogether:
"kmod-wl" for the kmod package
"broadcom-wl" for th
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 10:27 +, Chris Nolan wrote:
> >> (FWIW I've got a 4328 chipset on x86_64).
> >>
> >
> > No you don't. :)
> >
> > lspci lies, someone screwed up the name for device id 4328. The 4321
> and
> > 4322 typically sit behind a bridge that has device id 4328, or
> something
>
On 27.10.2008 12:15, Chris Nolan wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Please don't use the term "-kmod-common" in the package name; just
call it "broadcom-hybrid-wl" and add
Provides: broadcom-hybrid-wl-kmod-common = %{version}-%{release}
Thinking about it some more: Maybe the best scheme for both
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Please don't use the term "-kmod-common" in the package name; just
call it "broadcom-hybrid-wl" and add
Provides: broadcom-hybrid-wl-kmod-common = %{version}-%{release}
Thinking about it some more: Maybe the best scheme for both packages
might be:
"kmod-wl" for th
Jarod Wilson wrote:
Used what I believe were the same bits I used on the AppleTV, and the
performance was even worse than w/hybrid_wl, and ultimately, the
connection completely died. Need to try with another (newer) driver (the
one Dell actually published for the card).
[...]
I'd lean that w
On 27.10.2008 04:03, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 00:22 +, Chris Nolan wrote:
Jarod, Thorsten et al, couple of questions for you guys...
[...]
Now I have a couple of questions:
1) What should the package be called? I'm not thrilled with
"hybrid_wl-kmod" because I don't think
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 00:22 +, Chris Nolan wrote:
> Jarod, Thorsten et al, couple of questions for you guys...
>
> I've got so far as including the required license file in a (required)
> -common package, and made a few fixes to make rpmlint happy. I also
> included another patch to fix the
On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 22:21 +, Chris Nolan wrote:
> Jarod Wilson wrote:
> >
> > Heh, sorry 'bout that... Although to be honest, I dunno that I'd suggest
> > a kmod as a first package for *anyone*, since they consist of so much
> > black magic... :)
> >
> > However, I'd be perfectly happy if you
Jarod, Thorsten et al, couple of questions for you guys...
I've got so far as including the required license file in a (required)
-common package, and made a few fixes to make rpmlint happy. I also
included another patch to fix the vlanmode issue. Now I have a couple of
questions:
1) What sh
Jarod Wilson wrote:
Heh, sorry 'bout that... Although to be honest, I dunno that I'd suggest
a kmod as a first package for *anyone*, since they consist of so much
black magic... :)
However, I'd be perfectly happy if you wanted to take this on as its
primary maintainer, with me as a co-maintaine
On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 20:09 +0100, Andreas Thienemann wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Oct 2008, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>
> > Okay, so back to the Linux side and the hybrid_wl driver... I get no
> > better than ~350KB/s. I presume the driver isn't handling the
> > single-antenna very well or something [...]
>
>
On Sun, 26 Oct 2008, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> Okay, so back to the Linux side and the hybrid_wl driver... I get no
> better than ~350KB/s. I presume the driver isn't handling the
> single-antenna very well or something [...]
This might be an antenna diversity issue, but I do not think this is
likel
On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 10:12 +, Chris Nolan wrote:
> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > On 26.10.2008 05:02, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> >> Anyone working on a kmod package for the semi-open-source Broadcom
> >> driver?
> >
> > See the following mails that are just a few days old ;-)
> >
> > http://lists.rp
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 26.10.2008 05:02, Jarod Wilson wrote:
Anyone working on a kmod package for the semi-open-source Broadcom
driver?
See the following mails that are just a few days old ;-)
http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2008-October/001797.html
http://lis
On 26.10.2008 05:02, Jarod Wilson wrote:
Anyone working on a kmod package for the semi-open-source Broadcom
driver?
See the following mails that are just a few days old ;-)
http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2008-October/001797.html
http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/r
Anyone working on a kmod package for the semi-open-source Broadcom
driver?
http://www.broadcom.com/support/802.11/linux_sta.php
I recently acquired some hardware that theoretically will work with it
(though rumor has it ndiswrapper may still work better/allow faster
speeds).
I hacked something t
17 matches
Mail list logo
