Re: Nvidia 390.87 setting/xconfig

2018-10-07 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
Le dim. 7 oct. 2018 à 13:21, Richard Shaw a écrit : > > Ran into a problem, the arm package doesn't have a gtk3 library for > nvidia-xsettings... Have you got my message on the topic ? https://lists.rpmfusion.org/archives/list/rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org/thread/MPKSWH3NVG2WWVOJZKZLP

Re: Nvidia 390.87 setting/xconfig

2018-10-07 Thread Richard Shaw
Ran into a problem, the arm package doesn't have a gtk3 library for nvidia-xsettings... Should I just conditionalize it to package the gtk2 library instead? Thanks, Richard ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.or

Re: Nvidia 390.87 setting/xconfig

2018-10-04 Thread Richard Shaw
Ok, based on the feedback used the package name "nvidia-settings-390xx". I kept all the binary related stuff called "nvidia-settings" because I went with the conflict with the nvidia-settings package and renaming everything is a PITA. I will be doing some local testing on my home computer before

Re: Nvidia 390.87 setting/xconfig

2018-10-04 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
Le jeu. 4 oct. 2018 à 02:19, Richard Shaw a écrit : > > Ok, I know Nicolas mentioned bundling it but I'm assuming the idea was still > to split it out as a subpackage? > > Something like: > > nvidia-390xx-settings I think having nvidia-settings-390xx would be more readable. The big question is ei

Nvidia 390.87 setting/xconfig

2018-10-03 Thread Richard Shaw
Ok, I know Nicolas mentioned bundling it but I'm assuming the idea was still to split it out as a subpackage? Something like: nvidia-390xx-settings nvidia-390xx-xconfig Also I assume they should conflict with the main packages as they will install the same name binaries... Should we add a Recom