Frank Dana via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
> To respond to Kevin, more generally: Removing packages *can *be a
> disservice to users*,* *if there even are any*, but a package simply being
> in the repo does not mean that there are. And every package in the repo,
> no matter how frequently used and
Hello,
> We are about to branch in a few days, but I would pick this
> opportunity to ask which packages should be retired before branching
> RPM Fusion.
>
> I particularly wonder about nvidia 340xx that was EOL in 2019 but
> 390xx EOL in the end of 2022 would also apply for retirement if no
> ma
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 2:09 PM Antonio T. sagitter <
sagit...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> On 08/02/23 11:25, Frank Dana via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
> >
> >
> > There are also a few... /slightly esoteric/ (I'm being charitable)
> > emulators for old systems and game consoles. If people genuin
On 08/02/23 11:25, Frank Dana via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
There are also a few... /slightly esoteric/ (I'm being charitable)
emulators for old systems and game consoles. If people genuinely still
find them useful and valuable, then great! But I think it's worth at
least asking the quest
Am 08.02.23 um 13:40 schrieb Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski via
rpmfusion-developers:
On Wednesday, 08 February 2023 at 12:42, Ralf Corsépius via
rpmfusion-developers wrote:
Am 08.02.23 um 12:27 schrieb Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski via
rpmfusion-developers:
Plus the DVD- and BD-specifi
s.rpmfusion.org
Cc: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Subject: Re: Packages to be retired by f38
On Wednesday, 08 February 2023 at 12:42, Ralf Corsépius via
rpmfusion-developers wrote:
>
>
> Am 08.02.23 um 12:27 schrieb Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski via
> rpmfusi
Oh, so, AFTER I resend this by e-mail, the message I had sent through Gmane
actually goes through. Seems to just have been delayed rather than eaten.
Sorry for the double post.
Kevin Kofler
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-dev
Frank Dana via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
> There are an AWFUL lot of DVD-authoring and -conversion tools still in the
> REPOs, considering how infrequently most people even encounter physical
> media these days.
>
> Do we really need a half-dozen different ways to create menus and disc
> images,
Frank Dana via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
> There are an AWFUL lot of DVD-authoring and -conversion tools still in the
> REPOs, considering how infrequently most people even encounter physical
> media these days.
>
> Do we really need a half-dozen different ways to create menus and disc
> images,
On Wednesday, 08 February 2023 at 12:42, Ralf Corsépius via
rpmfusion-developers wrote:
>
>
> Am 08.02.23 um 12:27 schrieb Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski via
> rpmfusion-developers:
>
> > > Plus the DVD- and BD-specific libraries. (Though most of these are
> > > probably
> > > still dependenci
Am 08.02.23 um 12:27 schrieb Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski via
rpmfusion-developers:
Plus the DVD- and BD-specific libraries. (Though most of these are probably
still dependencies of other packages like ffmpeg, or are useful with data
discs as well.):
- libbdplus
IIRC, it's an optional
On Wednesday, 08 February 2023 at 11:25, Frank Dana via rpmfusion-developers
wrote:
> There are an AWFUL lot of DVD-authoring and -conversion tools still in the
> REPOs, considering how infrequently most people even encounter physical
> media these days.
>
> Do we really need a half-dozen differe
There are an AWFUL lot of DVD-authoring and -conversion tools still in the
REPOs, considering how infrequently most people even encounter physical
media these days.
Do we really need a half-dozen different ways to create menus and disc
images, so we can party like it's 1997?
- dvdstyler
- d
Hi there,
We are about to branch in a few days, but I would pick this
opportunity to ask which packages should be retired before branching
RPM Fusion.
I particularly wonder about nvidia 340xx that was EOL in 2019 but
390xx EOL in the end of 2022 would also apply for retirement if no
maintainer (f
14 matches
Mail list logo
