Am 07.10.20 um 15:08 schrieb Dave Pawson:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/dnf-system-upgrade/
Advises download, then reboot+upgrade.
defaults and recommendations are what they are, not more and not less, i
take my expierience from around 900 dist-upgrades over the past 12
y
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/dnf-system-upgrade/
Advises download, then reboot+upgrade.
regards
On Wed, 7 Oct 2020 at 13:38, Matti Pulkkinen wrote:
>
> Reindl Harald kirjoitti 6.10.2020 klo 18.16:
> > uhm are people really doing the offline updates?
>
> Yes.
>
> --
> Terveisi
Reindl Harald kirjoitti 6.10.2020 klo 18.16:
uhm are people really doing the offline updates?
Yes.
--
Terveisin / Regards,
Matti Pulkkinen
___
rpmfusion-users mailing list -- rpmfusion-users@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusi
On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 at 15:28, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 06.10.20 um 15:49 schrieb Dave Pawson:
> > Thanks people.
> >
> > ~ 14:48 > uname -r
> > 5.8.12-300.fc33.x86_64
> >
> > Reboot took 18 minutes to login
> > :-)
>
> unless your data is carvd into stones there is something terrible wrong
Am 06.10.20 um 16:56 schrieb José Abílio Matos:
> On Tuesday, October 6, 2020 3:27:54 PM WEST Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> unless your data is carvd into stones there is something terrible wrong
>
>> on your system and "systemd-analyze blame" should tell what unless it
>
>> was a one-time hang at
On Tuesday, October 6, 2020 3:27:54 PM WEST Reindl Harald wrote:
> unless your data is carvd into stones there is something terrible wrong
> on your system and "systemd-analyze blame" should tell what unless it
> was a one-time hang at shutdown
>
> my slowest machine with HDD takes 26 seconds to b
Am 06.10.20 um 15:49 schrieb Dave Pawson:
> Thanks people.
>
> ~ 14:48 > uname -r
> 5.8.12-300.fc33.x86_64
>
> Reboot took 18 minutes to login
> :-)
unless your data is carvd into stones there is something terrible wrong
on your system and "systemd-analyze blame" should tell what unless it
wa
Am 06.10.20 um 15:21 schrieb Dave Pawson:
> On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 at 13:55, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> Should I remove one of these please?
>>> The first one is unfamiliar. I know I need the gstreamer packages
>>
>> in doubt you always try "dnf remove" and look if there's something for
>> you importa
Thanks people.
~ 14:48 > uname -r
5.8.12-300.fc33.x86_64
Reboot took 18 minutes to login
:-)
regards
On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 at 14:21, Dave Pawson wrote:
>
> On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 at 13:55, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > > Should I remove one of these please?
> > > The first one is unfamiliar. I know I ne
On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 at 13:55, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > Should I remove one of these please?
> > The first one is unfamiliar. I know I need the gstreamer packages
>
> in doubt you always try "dnf remove" and look if there's something for
> you important in the dependency chain
>
> even if something
> rpm -qi gstreamer1-svt-hevc
Name: gstreamer1-svt-hevc
Version : 1.5.0
Release : 1.fc32
Architecture: x86_64
Install Date: Sat 08 Aug 2020 15:37:22 BST
Group : Unspecified
Size: 49040
License : BSD-2-Clause-Patent
Signature : RSA/SHA1, Tue 04 Aug 2020 10:14:56
Am 06.10.20 um 13:24 schrieb Dave Pawson:
> Removed the packages in error.
> Attempted the upgrade
>
>> sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=33
>
> Keys imported,
> All downloaded, then
>
> ...running transaction check
> Transaction check succeeded.
> Running transaction tes
Le mar. 6 oct. 2020 à 13:29, Dave Pawson a écrit :
>
> Removed the packages in error.
> Attempted the upgrade
>
> > sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=33
>
> Keys imported,
> All downloaded, then
>
> ...running transaction check
> Transaction check succeeded.
> Running transac
Removed the packages in error.
Attempted the upgrade
> sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=33
Keys imported,
All downloaded, then
...running transaction check
Transaction check succeeded.
Running transaction test
The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next succ
Am 03.10.20 um 17:03 schrieb Dave Pawson:
> Do you mean package creators Reidnl?
>
> The 'question' I have often asked is:
> "What packages are installed above Fedora 32 base"
> I.e. what have I installed!
jesus that below was an rpm-spec to build "lounge-rhsoft-workstation"
which i a simple rp
Do you mean package creators Reidnl?
The 'question' I have often asked is:
"What packages are installed above Fedora 32 base"
I.e. what have I installed!
regards
On Sat, 3 Oct 2020 at 15:20, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> why don't people just create a metapackge qith "Requires:" everything
> they in
why don't people just create a metapackge qith "Requires:" everything
they installed on purpose so that you can do "dnf leaves" and remove
*everything* it lists?
works great for 10 years on desktops and servers
not having any unued package installed dramatically improves update
times, backups and
Dependencies resolved.
Package Architecture Version
Repository Size
===
Thanks Jose / Reindl
regards
On Sat, 3 Oct 2020 at 13:54, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 03.10.20 um 12:45 schrieb Dave Pawson:
> > Thanks Ed.
> >
> > Using dnf search
> >
> > searching for repo that provides these
> >
> > gstreamer1-devel-docs-1.16.2-2.fc32.noarch none (that I use)
> > gstrea
Am 03.10.20 um 12:45 schrieb Dave Pawson:
> Thanks Ed.
>
> Using dnf search
>
> searching for repo that provides these
>
> gstreamer1-devel-docs-1.16.2-2.fc32.noarch none (that I use)
> gstreamer1-libav-devel-docs-1.16.2-3.fc32.noarch none
> gstreamer1-plugins-base-devel-docs-1.16.2-3.fc32.no
On Saturday, October 3, 2020 11:45:38 AM WEST Dave Pawson wrote:
> Thanks Ed.
>
> Using dnf search
>
> searching for repo that provides these
>
> gstreamer1-devel-docs-1.16.2-2.fc32.noarch none (that I use)
> gstreamer1-libav-devel-docs-1.16.2-3.fc32.noarch none
> gstreamer1-plugins-base-devel-
Thanks Ed.
Using dnf search
searching for repo that provides these
gstreamer1-devel-docs-1.16.2-2.fc32.noarch none (that I use)
gstreamer1-libav-devel-docs-1.16.2-3.fc32.noarch none
gstreamer1-plugins-base-devel-docs-1.16.2-3.fc32.noarch none
gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free-devel-1.16.2-2.fc32.x86
On 2020-10-03 17:55, Dave Pawson wrote:
> Seems so, but other issues showing up
Best to verify what repos those packages are from.
For example,
gstreamer1-rtsp-server is actually in the fedora repo for f32.
I'll leave it to you to check the others.
>
> Error:
> Problem 1: package gstreamer1-
Seems so, but other issues showing up
Error:
Problem 1: package gstreamer1-devel-docs-1.16.2-2.fc32.noarch
requires gstreamer1 = 1.16.2-2.fc32, but none of the providers can be
installed
- gstreamer1-1.16.2-2.fc32.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
- problem with installed pac
Can anyone say if kmod-nvidia is ready for fedora 33 please?
TiA
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
___
rpmfusion-users mailing list -- rpmfusion-users@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-users-le...@lists.rpmfusion
25 matches
Mail list logo
