On 8/24/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/24/07, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 8/24/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > describe Widget, "class" do
> > > it "should provide a list of widgets sorted alphabetically" do
> > > Widget.should_rece
On 9/1/07, rupert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 1 Sep 2007, at 10:04, Tom Stuart wrote:
>
> > On 1 Sep 2007, at 09:31, rupert wrote:
> >>> Are we planning on dumping the mock framework in favor of using
> >>> Mocha
> >> The idea has been bandied around on the dev list recently
This decision,
On 9/1/07, Andrew WC Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After a quick google search:
>
> http://www.slideshare.net/viget/mockfight-flexmock-vs-mocha
In fairness - there is something lacking in the slide set - it
suggests that mocha supports parameter matchers and flexmock does not.
In fact, flexmo
After a quick google search:
http://www.slideshare.net/viget/mockfight-flexmock-vs-mocha
I have no problem using a external mocking framework but its the choosing.
convention over configuration.
On 9/1/07, rupert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 1 Sep 2007, at 18:16, Andrew WC Brown wrote:
On 1 Sep 2007, at 18:16, Andrew WC Brown wrote:
> My question is what would you recommend for Mocking?
>
> Mocha or FlexMock?
Personally, I've not got a clue as all I've used to date is the rspec
mocking framework. I've had a quick look at Mocha and it seems
pretty good, but haven't looked
My question is what would you recommend for Mocking?
Mocha or FlexMock?
On 9/1/07, rupert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 1 Sep 2007, at 10:04, Tom Stuart wrote:
>
> > On 1 Sep 2007, at 09:31, rupert wrote:
> >>> Are we planning on dumping the mock framework in favor of using
> >>> Mocha
> >
> On 8/31/07, Edgar Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I got the resource "Llamadas" nested in:
>> - Operadores
>> - Productos
>> - Centros
>>
>> Here is part of my routes http://pastie.caboo.se/92767
>>
>> I want to spec that the routes for Llamadas, I tried several
>> approachs:
>
On 8/31/07, Edgar Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got the resource "Llamadas" nested in:
> - Operadores
> - Productos
> - Centros
>
> Here is part of my routes http://pastie.caboo.se/92767
>
> I want to spec that the routes for Llamadas, I tried several approachs:
>
> - route_for(:c
On 1 Sep 2007, at 10:04, Tom Stuart wrote:
> On 1 Sep 2007, at 09:31, rupert wrote:
>>> Are we planning on dumping the mock framework in favor of using
>>> Mocha
>> The idea has been banded around on the dev list recently
>
> This makes me sad, because it means only one thing for the majority
>
El 1/9/2007, a las 11:15, Peter Marklund escribió:
> I understand where you're coming from Tom. But it's currently two
> script/plugin installs to start using RSpec with Rails, making it be
> three (the current two plus a mocking framework) is presumably not
> going to change adoption or the hurdl
On 9/1/07, rupert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I saw in one of Dave C.'s comments to a ticket that "our current plan
> > is to deprecate the mocking framework." I hadn't heard anything about
> > that, but then again I haven't paid super close attention to the list.
> > Are we planning on dumpin
I understand where you're coming from Tom. But it's currently two
script/plugin installs to start using RSpec with Rails, making it be
three (the current two plus a mocking framework) is presumably not
going to change adoption or the hurdle of using RSpec by much. I
currently use Mocha beca
On 1 Sep 2007, at 09:31, rupert wrote:
>> Are we planning on dumping the mock framework in favor of using
>> Mocha
> The idea has been banded around on the dev list recently
This makes me sad, because it means only one thing for the majority
of users: more hassle. So now I have to choose a mo
> I saw in one of Dave C.'s comments to a ticket that "our current plan
> is to deprecate the mocking framework." I hadn't heard anything about
> that, but then again I haven't paid super close attention to the list.
> Are we planning on dumping the mock framework in favor of using Mocha
> (or an
14 matches
Mail list logo