On 23 Dec 2008, at 23:07, Jeremiah Heller wrote:
On 23 Dec 2008, at 18:26, Sarah Allen wrote:
Matt Wynne wrote:
ActiveRecord::Validations uses a trick that's used widely in rails,
and is arguably[1] becoming a Ruby idiom, apparently.
This is the interesting bit, around line #275:
def se
On 23 Dec 2008, at 18:26, Sarah Allen wrote:
Matt Wynne wrote:
ActiveRecord::Validations uses a trick that's used widely in rails,
and is arguably[1] becoming a Ruby idiom, apparently.
This is the interesting bit, around line #275:
def self.included(base) # :nodoc:
base.extend Class
actually I didn't check in so I can't do a diff :(
I did move the creation of the row in "interest_rates" from the helper to
the example setup, i.e. this bit:
InterestRate.create!(:rate => 5.0, :start_date =>
Time.now.to_date.years_ago(1), :bank_account_id => @destn_bank.id)
but I'm not sure
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 10:53 PM, Greg Hauptmann
wrote:
> PSS. Note sure why, however now it seems "rake spec" is working. Did make
> some minor changes to the spec but nothing I would have thought that would
> have solved this...ummm
What changes?
>
> On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Greg Ha
PSS. Note sure why, however now it seems "rake spec" is working. Did make
some minor changes to the spec but nothing I would have thought that would
have solved this...ummm
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Greg Hauptmann <
greg.hauptmann.r...@gmail.com> wrote:
> PS. I do call the method in a
Matt Wynne wrote:
> ActiveRecord::Validations uses a trick that's used widely in rails,
> and is arguably[1] becoming a Ruby idiom, apparently.
>
> This is the interesting bit, around line #275:
>
> def self.included(base) # :nodoc:
>base.extend ClassMethods
>
> So basically that me
PS. I do call the method in a before(:each)...
describe Recurring, '.add_projections (interest)' do
include RecurringSpecHelper
before(:each) do
load_bank_account_base_fixtures # <=== Called Here
@destn_bank.should_not be_nil
.
.
.
Hi,
Here's an example (below) of the errors I get when I run "rake spec",
however they don't occur when I run "spec ". The issue seems to
be that when I call a help method which is "included" there is a point it
adds an interest rate row to a table. In the successful case it appears
this works,
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 8:29 PM, Greg Hauptmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know why I would have some spec's failing when using
> "./script/autospec" or "rake spec", however when I just run them using "ruby
> " it passes ok"? What's the difference in kicking off a spec by
> these different mea
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Greg Hauptmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to run a spec in debug mode (using rdebug) so I can use
> breakpoints in my spec code?
rdebug path/to/my_spec.rb
>
> I ask this noting I've got some differences in specs passing/failing
> depending on whether I run t
Hi,
Is there a way to run a spec in debug mode (using rdebug) so I can use
breakpoints in my spec code?
I ask this noting I've got some differences in specs passing/failing
depending on whether I run the spec via "ruby " as opposed to
"rake spec". (raised in separate thread)
thanks
Hi,
Does anyone know why I would have some spec's failing when using
"./script/autospec" or "rake spec", however when I just run them using "ruby
" it passes ok"? What's the difference in kicking off a spec by
these different means?
Only thing that comes to mind is perhaps using "ruby " is mayb
>> Cucumber itself is not forking anything though.
Sure it is, Cucumber is forking cool.
Tim
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 4:49 PM, aslak hellesoy
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 1:12 PM, aidy lewis
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Aslak,
>>
>> Thanks for the heads-up, but it seems the AfterStep block is only
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 1:12 PM, aidy lewis wrote:
> Hi Aslak,
>
> Thanks for the heads-up, but it seems the AfterStep block is only
> executed if a step passes and not if it fails, is pending, skipped or
> non-implemented.
>
> I tried to run a debugger on it to see what happens, but I think
> Cuc
Ahh...reality is overrated.
Thanks again for your help guys. Making a lot of sense. If I could get
rcumber working that's be awesome.
Tim
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 4:39 PM, aslak hellesoy
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 12:10 AM, Tim Walker wrote:
>>
>> Very nice indeed...
>>
>>
>> In your
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 12:10 AM, Tim Walker wrote:
> Very nice indeed...
>
>
> In your blog you said:
>
> "Note that one of the steps is already defined in webrat. Isn't that
> cool? As you get the hang of this, you reuse certain word patterns
> which map to specific tests. But we're getting ahe
Very nice indeed...
In your blog you said:
"Note that one of the steps is already defined in webrat. Isn't that
cool? As you get the hang of this, you reuse certain word patterns
which map to specific tests. But we're getting ahead of ourselves. We
need to dive into the creation of "steps" which
Bingo!
module ActionController
Dispatcher.class_eval do
def self.failsafe_response(output, status, exception = nil)
raise exception
end
end
end
And it works with vendor rails. (It would break every story run
against versions < 2.2.2, but that's another issue.)
Gem rails of
Hi,
I have not had any trouble opening the debugger in cucumber.
Then "debug" do
debugger
stop_here = 1
end
M
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 4:12 AM, aidy lewis wrote:
> Hi Aslak,
>
> Thanks for the heads-up, but it seems the AfterStep block is only
> executed if a step passes and not if it fails
you could mess around with what cucumber is doing, like
@__executor.instance_variable_get("@executed_scenarios")
There may be an easier way that I'm not aware of.
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 8:26 AM, aidy lewis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is the way to figure out the the last scenario executed in the Afte
Also, the name isn't Dispatcher anymore, it's ActionController::Dispatcher.
-
Maurício Linhares
http://alinhavado.wordpress.com/ (pt-br) | http://blog.codevader.com/ (en)
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 7:26 PM, Mischa Fierer wrote:
> from
> /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/cucumber-0.1.13/bin/../li
from
/opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/cucumber-0.1.13/bin/../lib/cucumber/rails/world.rb:18
Here's line 18:
Dispatcher.class_eval do
def self.failsafe_response(output, status, exception = nil)
raise exception
end
end
I would do the following:
1) Try it with gem rails on the old projec
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 7:04 PM, s.ross wrote:
> Hello--
>
> A bit stranger than that, I'm afraid. A fresh Rails project works with
> cucumber right out of the box. This older one, recently upgraded to 2.2.2,
> has the problem with dependencies.rb. The main difference is that the fresh
> project i
Hello--
On Dec 23, 2008, at 11:46 AM, Maurício Linhares wrote:
I had a problem just like this with "has_many_polymorphs" and it was a
bad require ( it was requiring "dispatcher" when it should be
requiring "action_controller/dispatcher")
Maybe a "require 'action_controller/dispatcher'" could s
On 22 Dec 2008, at 19:09, Sarah Allen wrote:
I realize this is off-topic for the RSpec forum and cucumber tutorial,
but I'm hoping you'll enlighten me on this point which is, I guess,
more
of a Ruby language question...
My Task model is simply defined (by the generate scaffold script) as:
c
I had a problem just like this with "has_many_polymorphs" and it was a
bad require ( it was requiring "dispatcher" when it should be
requiring "action_controller/dispatcher")
Maybe a "require 'action_controller/dispatcher'" could solve your issue.
-
Maurício Linhares
http://alinhavado.wordpress.co
I'm running into a problem getting any results from Cucumber at this
point. I was able to a while ago, but I upgraded to Rails 2.2.2 and
poof! No Cucumber. Any thoughts what might be wrong?
Rails 2.2.2
Cucumber 0.1.13
Webrat aslakhellesoy-webrat (0.3.2.1)
rspec (1.1.11)
rspec-rails (1.1.11)
Hi,
Is the way to figure out the the last scenario executed in the After block?
Aidy
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Hi Guys,
Just installed rcumber and added the following to routes.rb, etc.
map.rcumber 'rcumber', :controller => 'rcumbers', :action => 'index'
map.resources :rcumbers do |rcumber|
rcumber.run 'run', :controller => 'rcumbers', :action => 'run'
end
When browsing to page at:
http://local
> I think this is a bug, but I don't know.
Well, I see all more clear now.
I thought it was a bug because I thought it was failing only when
running the feature, and it worked without problem hitting the
application with the browser.
But this was not true.
It worked because I had index.html in /p
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 11:30 PM, Jeremiah Heller wrote:
> On 22 Dec 2008, at 16:03, Sarah Allen wrote:
>
>> Could someone describe what "table > tr:nth-child(#{pos.to_i+1})" does?
>> by semantic pattern matching I could guess that "ol >
>> li:nth-child(#{pos.to_i+1})" would also work, but it woul
Thanks Matt.
You were right,
I have modified routes.rb with mapping root url but I did't understand
why this is needed.
The create action in sessions controller is completely standar.
The sentence that is causing the error
redirect_back_or_default('/')
is not using thr root_url.
I think this i
Hi Aslak,
Thanks for the heads-up, but it seems the AfterStep block is only
executed if a step passes and not if it fails, is pending, skipped or
non-implemented.
I tried to run a debugger on it to see what happens, but I think
Cucumber is opening another Ruby process and preventing me from
debug
On 23 Dec 2008, at 09:04, Juanma Cervera wrote:
Hello
I am starting using cucumber with an app using restful_authentication.
I am having an error that is driving me mad.
I am using this step
Given /^que he hecho login en la aplicación$/ do
user = User.create!(
:login => "mi_login",
Hello
I am starting using cucumber with an app using restful_authentication.
I am having an error that is driving me mad.
I am using this step
Given /^que he hecho login en la aplicación$/ do
user = User.create!(
:login => "mi_login",
:name => "mi_nombre",
:email => "mi_lo...
Sarah Allen wrote:
> What if I wanted to destroy the lorry with "name 3" instead of the 3rd
> lorry?
I was trying to solve a similar problem a few weeks ago. You might be
interested in the response I got: http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/171269
HTH
Paul
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
36 matches
Mail list logo
