On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Perryn Fowler wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am experimenting with Constructor based dependency injection for
> rails controllers.
>
> So I have something like this
>
> class LoginSessionsController < ApplicationController
>
> def initialize(authenticator = TheRealAuthenticato
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Perryn Fowler wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am experimenting with Constructor based dependency injection for
> rails controllers.
>
> So I have something like this
>
> class LoginSessionsController < ApplicationController
>
> def initialize(authenticator = TheRealAuthenticat
Hi
I am experimenting with Constructor based dependency injection for
rails controllers.
So I have something like this
class LoginSessionsController < ApplicationController
def initialize(authenticator = TheRealAuthenticator)
@authenticator = authenticator
end
end
The plan was
We've seen this behavior again, this time with rspec-1.1.12 and jruby
1.2.0RC1; the common factors seem to be:
(1) jruby
(2) rspec 1.1.11 or 1.1.12
(3) naming a java class with the string 'context' or 'Context' in its name.
In this case the bit of ruby causing trouble was:
SecurityContex
Scott Taylor wrote:
> You could try this plugin:
>
> http://github.com/aussiegeek/active_record_defaults/tree/master
>
> Scott
Thanks, I will try this out.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.o
On Mar 4, 2009, at 12:16 PM, James Byrne wrote:
This is sort of off topic but it arose from a cucumber test failure
and
I am unsure how to address the underlying issue.
I spent yesterday tracking down an obscure error that was exposed by a
new cucumber test. It turned out to be an improper
David and Ben,
Thank you very much for your advice :).
--
Bira
http://compexplicita.wordpress.com
http://compexplicita.tumblr.com
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Hi David,
I think I see what you're saying, but I admit I'm still a bit confused.
Maybe I'm missing something here, but I can't think of how I would drive
the scripts (even through Cucumber) without actually invoking them, thus
kicking off processes that I don't want.
Real code to illustrate my
Great writing. Thanks
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 5:25 AM, Dan North wrote:
> 2009/2/24 aslak hellesoy
>
>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Rob Holland
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Matt Wynne wrote:
>> >
>> >> You can even use git commit --amend to commit on red (e.g at the en
On 4 Mar 2009, at 11:25, Dan North wrote:
2009/2/24 aslak hellesoy
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Rob Holland
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Matt Wynne
wrote:
>
>> You can even use git commit --amend to commit on red (e.g at the
end of the
>> day) and then change that c
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 6:25 AM, Dan North wrote:
> Marking a feature as done can be as simple as moving it between two
> directories (called in-progress and done), renaming the feature (from
> openid_login.in-progress to openid_login.feature) or having an :in_progress
> tag on a feature until it's
This is sort of off topic but it arose from a cucumber test failure and
I am unsure how to address the underlying issue.
I spent yesterday tracking down an obscure error that was exposed by a
new cucumber test. It turned out to be an improper default value
assignment made in a controller which in
David Chelimsky wrote:
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 4:54 AM, Bira wrote:
Hello!
I've been lurking in the list a while, and now I would like to ask you
a somewhat "noobish" question... This is the first time I've run
across this particular problem, so I'm not sure what to do. I'm sure
this is so c
The app runs fine, its the cucumber tests that don't. If you can point me to
your app I'll give it go here.
I'm using classic style (just started with Sinatra)
2009/3/4 Rob Holland
> My application (the one on which the wiki example is based) still runs
> just fine on 0.9.1, so I don't think it
Apologies - false alarm - problem was with my step-definition
all best
Andrew
2009/3/4 Andrew Premdas
> The app runs fine, its the cucumber tests that don't. If you can point me
> to your app I'll give it go here.
>
> I'm using classic style (just started with Sinatra)
>
> 2009/3/4 Rob Hollan
Thanks alot - works a treat :)
2009/3/4 Rob Holland
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 4:30 AM, Andrew Premdas wrote:
> > With Cuc and Rails I'd be able to debug step definitions by putting
> > 'debugger' in the relevant step definition. With Sinatra configured as
> above
> > this doesn't work. Any tips
Rob,
Is your Sinatra app using the "classic" style? If so, I think it would
work without need for modification. If your app is a class that
inherits from Sinatra::Base, you're likely to see issues unless you
take the steps in the Gist.
Pat
On Mar 4, 2009, at 4:43 AM, Rob Holland wrote:
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 4:54 AM, Bira wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I've been lurking in the list a while, and now I would like to ask you
> a somewhat "noobish" question... This is the first time I've run
> across this particular problem, so I'm not sure what to do. I'm sure
> this is so common that's in a
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Sebastian W. wrote:
> Hello RSpec mailing list,
> I have a question which I'm sure someone here has a "duh!" answer to. :P
>
> A lot of the Ruby programming I do is around installing servers and
> automating various tasks. The pattern I use goes as follows, I'm sur
2009/2/24 aslak hellesoy
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Rob Holland
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Matt Wynne wrote:
> >
> >> You can even use git commit --amend to commit on red (e.g at the end of
> the
> >> day) and then change that commit later.
> >
> > While I think comm
Hello!
I've been lurking in the list a while, and now I would like to ask you
a somewhat "noobish" question... This is the first time I've run
across this particular problem, so I'm not sure what to do. I'm sure
this is so common that's in a textbook somewhere, but what is the best
way to write sp
> My guess is that it's the initial start-up that's slow. This is a great
> reason to use something like autotest, which will keep the process loaded
> up. I wonder how that hell you could make that work with C# code though!
> Watch the DLLs?!
coming late on this one - if this is useful to someone
My application (the one on which the wiki example is based) still runs
just fine on 0.9.1, so I don't think it's related to the version
change.
I think the hacks Pat used are solely to do with getting selenium mode happy.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rsp
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 4:30 AM, Andrew Premdas wrote:
> With Cuc and Rails I'd be able to debug step definitions by putting
> 'debugger' in the relevant step definition. With Sinatra configured as above
> this doesn't work. Any tips on making this work and/or explaining whats
> different/
Just us
24 matches
Mail list logo
