Hi,
I'm trying to write my first custom matcher.
Here's a bit of my example group.
describe "/contact/index" do
include FormMatchers
before(:each) do
render 'contact/index'
end
it "should show the contact form" do
response.should have_a_contact_form
end
describe "the
2009/4/2 Tim Harper
> Is currently a way to add a upon failure hook? I'd like to make it so
> that, in the event of a failed assertion, Webrat will take the last
> requested page and open it in a browser.
>
http://wiki.github.com/aslakhellesoy/cucumber/hooks
After do |scenario|
# currently n
Is currently a way to add a upon failure hook? I'd like to make it so that,
in the event of a failed assertion, Webrat will take the last requested page
and open it in a browser.
Thanks :)
Tim
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http:
SOLVED:
OK the problem was coming from Carlos Brando autotest-notification 1.9.0. It
had to do with invalid checking of constants. Testing SUCCESS_SOUND.empty?
instead of const_defined?("SUCCESS_SOUND").
I've fixed it in my fork.
http://github.com/marcusrosentrater/autotest-notification/tree/mas
I'm trying to upgrade to RSpec 1.2.2 in a Rails app, and reading
Upgrade.rdoc I see that now every controller action must have a
corresponding template for their specs to pass. However, we have a few
controllers which only return XML or JSON as generated by Rails'
to_xml and to_json methods, and so
Zach Dennis wrote:
>
>
> Thanks for sharing James. I know when you first joined the list there
> were a few frustrating moments, and it's really good to hear about
> where you've come and how you've gotten there. This is helpful to both
> newbs and seasoned BDDers alike,
>
I am very, very gratef
Maybe related. When I try to run RSpactor (since autospec isn't working) it
only runs 1 example.
Still no solution.
rosentraterds wrote:
>
> I'm thinking now the problem may be ZenTest 4.0. I reverted back to 3.11
> and it was working there. But 3.11 has conflicts with Rails 2.3.2 and I
> need
I'm thinking now the problem may be ZenTest 4.0. I reverted back to 3.11 and
it was working there. But 3.11 has conflicts with Rails 2.3.2 and I need to
run rails. Still need help if anybody has some for me.
Thanks again.
rosentraterds wrote:
>
> I installed an app template into an existing ra
I installed an app template into an existing rails install. In the process I
upgraded to RSpec 1.2.2 and I'm running Rails 2.3.2.
Now autospec will run once and then exit. Returning me to the CLI prompt.
Any ideas?
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Autospec-stops-
Hi David
2009/4/1 David Chelimsky :
>. That said, in some idealistic BDD fashion, I'd think the best
> deal would be the tester and developer pairing on automating AC. Then
> that developer would pair with another developer driving out the code
> w/ TDD.
If we have two different sets of people i
Hi,
Ticket 44 is resolved, I am using 0.2.3 and attempting to throw the
html upon a failure
Before do |scenario|
@sc = scenario
end
After do
puts @sc.methods.sort
throw $browser.html @sc.failed?
end
Have these getters not been released or is my implementation flawed?
Thanks
Aidy
___
e a lot of code out there at this basic a level.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Scott
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Stephen Eley wrote:
>
>> 2009/4/1 Pablo L. de Miranda :
>> > @Fernando - So what material you recommend to start a study in rSpec?
>>
>> 1.) The W
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:50 AM, James Byrne wrote:
> Pablo L. de Miranda wrote:
>> @Fernando - So what material you recommend to start a study in rSpec?
>>
>
> This might be heresy, but I suggest that you start with Cucumber and
> simply use RSpec matcher syntax in your step definitions. Once y
e a lot of code out there at this basic a level.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Scott
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Stephen Eley wrote:
>
>> 2009/4/1 Pablo L. de Miranda :
>> > @Fernando - So what material you recommend to start a study in rSpec?
>>
>> 1.) The W
Pablo L. de Miranda wrote:
> @Fernando - So what material you recommend to start a study in rSpec?
>
This might be heresy, but I suggest that you start with Cucumber and
simply use RSpec matcher syntax in your step definitions. Once you
have the hang of how to express expectations in the step
e a lot of code out there at this basic a level.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Scott
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Stephen Eley wrote:
>
>> 2009/4/1 Pablo L. de Miranda :
>> > @Fernando - So what material you recommend to start a study in rSpec?
>>
>> 1.) The W
e a lot of code out there at this basic a level.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Scott
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Stephen Eley wrote:
>
>> 2009/4/1 Pablo L. de Miranda :
>> > @Fernando - So what material you recommend to start a study in rSpec?
>>
>> 1.) The W
David,
That's more what I was looking for.
Thanks,
Scott
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 8:44 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> 2009/4/1 Scott LaBounty :
> > I've looked at the web site and I guess I'm looking for more examples.
> I'd
> > like to see some simple basic ruby code and then some rSpec code test
2009/4/1 Scott LaBounty :
> I've looked at the web site and I guess I'm looking for more examples. I'd
> like to see some simple basic ruby code and then some rSpec code testing it.
> No Rails, no nothing else. I haven't tried the book yet, but there does not
> seem to be a lot of code out there at
I've looked at the web site and I guess I'm looking for more examples. I'd
like to see some simple basic ruby code and then some rSpec code testing it.
No Rails, no nothing else. I haven't tried the book yet, but there does not
seem to be a lot of code out there at this basic a level.
Any ideas?
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 8:01 AM, aidy lewis wrote:
> Hi David
>
> 2009/3/31 David Chelimsky :
>
>> The point of TDD is writing small examples and small bits of code in a
>> cycle. The point of BDD is to write high level scenarios so you know
>> what code to write, but then drive it out in detail wi
2009/4/1 Pablo L. de Miranda :
> @Fernando - So what material you recommend to start a study in rSpec?
1.) The Web site documentation at http://rspec.info
2.) Use it and build experience.
3.) Get the beta of the RSpec book.
4.) Use it and build experience.
5.) Google is your friend.
6.) Use i
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
>
> I don't spec at all the way he shows, I might be doing things wrong, but
> I am very happy with my workflow.
http://www.kipling.org.uk/poems_neolithic.htm
(The poem's by Rudyard Kipling, if the URL doesn't make it clear.)
--
Have Fun
Hi All,
I think New user for rspec once need to see the peepcode videos. It is very
helpful for the starter to understand how the rspec is working. Other wise
the http://rspec.info documentation is providing the good information for
any rails developer to use and test it in the application.
Thank
Hi David
2009/3/31 David Chelimsky :
> The point of TDD is writing small examples and small bits of code in a
> cycle. The point of BDD is to write high level scenarios so you know
> what code to write, but then drive it out in detail with TDD.
Does this necessitate that the same person or pair
@Fernando - So what material you recommend to start a study in rSpec?
Att,
Pablo Lacerda de Miranda
pablolmira...@gmail.com
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> http://peepcode.com/products/rspec-basics
> http://peepcode.com/products/rspec-mocks-and-models
> http://peepcode.com/products/rspec-controllers-and-tools
>
I didn't like at all the peepcode episodes on RSpec. You'll have to
rewrite his valid_attributes trick from scratch if your models use
a
27 matches
Mail list logo
