Hi,
I want to build a custom example group, but there really aren't any examples
anywhere for how to do so. The new chapter in The RSpec Book talks about it,
but doesn't actually show an example, only how to register it.
Looking at rspec-rails, I can see a pattern, but I don't know if that's
spec
Zach Dennis wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 7:02 PM, James Byrne
> wrote:
>> �To Reduce Costs and Protect Revenue
>> I should construct the feature step definitions and how I would test
>> this. �I figure I just have to take as given that cron works because
>> that is not my code. �But how best
Zach Dennis wrote:
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 7:02 PM, James Byrne wrote:
I have a requirement to fetch a data feed from our central bank and set
a variety of currency exchange rates from that feed. My question is how
does one approach behavioural driven design with autonomous automated
process
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 7:02 PM, James Byrne wrote:
> I have a requirement to fetch a data feed from our central bank and set
> a variety of currency exchange rates from that feed. My question is how
> does one approach behavioural driven design with autonomous automated
> processing? What I start
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 6:36 PM, john wrote:
> Mysql::Error: You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that
> corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near
> 'RELEASE SAVEPOINT active_record_1' at line 1: RELEASE SAVEPOINT
> active_record_1
> a rails ticket
I have a requirement to fetch a data feed from our central bank and set
a variety of currency exchange rates from that feed. My question is how
does one approach behavioural driven design with autonomous automated
processing? What I started with is this:
Feature: Automatically Retrieve and Store F
On Apr 18, 2009, at 1:17 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
Hi,
Let's take the example of the depot app. In my controller I set
@order.
Then in the view comes the bad stuff:
@order.items.each do |item|
item.product.title
end
Now I'm having problems specing item.product.title. A quick and dirty
fi
My question is, why bother? Unless I'm missing something, testing for
the existence of an error that your code will never provide sounds
backwards. Instead test that you DON'T get an error when the required
value isn't explicitly supplied, to confirm that the default works.
(Although, really, the
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Fernando Perez wrote:
>
> @order.items.each do |item|
> item.product.title
> end
>
> Now I'm having problems specing item.product.title. A quick and dirty
> fix is to trade a for for an underscore, so I create Item#product_title:
>
> def product_title
> product.
Hi,
Let's take the example of the depot app. In my controller I set @order.
Then in the view comes the bad stuff:
@order.items.each do |item|
item.product.title
end
Now I'm having problems specing item.product.title. A quick and dirty
fix is to trade a for for an underscore, so I create Item#p
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 3:09 AM, svoop wrote:
> Pat Maddox writes:
>> Okay I must be dense because I'm not sure what you mean by it gets in
>> the way of refactoring.
>
> Actually, scratch that, because...
>
>> And you're right about how it behaves...that's exactly how default
>> attrs work. If
Pat Maddox writes:
> Okay I must be dense because I'm not sure what you mean by it gets in
> the way of refactoring.
Actually, scratch that, because...
> And you're right about how it behaves...that's exactly how default
> attrs work. If you want to test that your model doesn't allow invalid
>
> I've been doing something similar. I think the benefit of having half
> the steps(each can be negated) wins over the small impact it has on step
> readability. Personally I started adding stuff like this(perhaps not as
> DRY but simple enough):
>
> Then /^the correspondence should (not )?have
Aslak Hellesøy wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 12:08 AM, John Goodsen
wrote:
OK, I'll reproduce in a simple example and create a ticket...
Excellent - I'll get to it ASAP
I am also having the same issue with cucumber-java.
please refer - http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/184342#new
With
On 18 Apr 2009, at 05:08, David Chelimsky wrote:
I'm not sure that requiring environment.rb is the right solution
because it will be loaded no matter what rake task is invoked, and
that is clearly not the intent for all rake tasks.
I hate to go back to the ugly mess that was there to add either
15 matches
Mail list logo
