nruth wrote:
Hi Guys
I'm going to put the cat amongst the pigeons here in the hope of some
clarity falling out of the sky on me.
My question is this: In a world with Cucumber what is the value of
view specs?
In the community (railscamp, for example) there are a fair number of
people using Cucum
I am writing a script that reads connection information from a config
file, and based, on what it finds, connects to multiple mysql servers
and performs tasks. To test this script, I need to set up test
servers, but getting them running without causing the tests to be
rerun when they stop is a bit
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 9:46 PM, nruth wrote:
>
> For the time being I'm going to keep writing view specs, but try to
> make them lighter and cut some of the dead wood by describing unusual
> or interesting behaviour rather than all behaviour.
What a strange rant. "What's the value of this? Look
Excelent, Pat.
Is this operator documented somewhere?
Thank you,
Rodrigo.
Em 29-10-2009 00:16, Pat Maddox escreveu:
Already in.
[1,2].should =~ [2,1]
Pat
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas
wrote:
How about having this matcher along the default available matcher
Hi Guys
I'm going to put the cat amongst the pigeons here in the hope of some
clarity falling out of the sky on me.
My question is this: In a world with Cucumber what is the value of
view specs?
In the community (railscamp, for example) there are a fair number of
people using Cucumber and skippin
Already in.
[1,2].should =~ [2,1]
Pat
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas
wrote:
> How about having this matcher along the default available matchers?
>
> require 'set'
> Spec::Matchers.define :have_same_elements_of do |expected|
> match do |actual|
> expected.to_set ==
How about having this matcher along the default available matchers?
require 'set'
Spec::Matchers.define :have_same_elements_of do |expected|
match do |actual|
expected.to_set == actual.to_set
end
end
Example:
[1,2].should have_same_elements_of([2,1])
Best Regards,
Rodrigo.
__
Some plugins (like Thinking Sphinx) preload all the files in the app/
folder. You can see if this is the case by logging spork's output to a
file and see what requested the app/* files to load.
spork -d > spork.log
More details can be found here:
http://upstream-berlin.com/2009/07/27/kickstart-
Sorry about that :( And thanks, Ashley, for righting (and writing) my
wrong.
Cheers,
David
On Oct 28, 2009, at 4:06 PM, Student wrote:
Sweet! Thanks!
On Oct 28, 3:52 pm, Ashley Moran
wrote:
On 28 Oct 2009, at 20:42, Student wrote:
So now I'm
back to the "undefined method `after' for ma
Sweet! Thanks!
On Oct 28, 3:52 pm, Ashley Moran
wrote:
> On 28 Oct 2009, at 20:42, Student wrote:
>
> > So now I'm
> > back to the "undefined method `after' for main:Object (NoMethodError)"
> > problem.
>
> I think it was just a typo on David's part. Does the following work?
>
> Spec::Runner
On 28 Oct 2009, at 20:42, Student wrote:
So now I'm
back to the "undefined method `after' for main:Object (NoMethodError)"
problem.
I think it was just a typo on David's part. Does the following work?
Spec::Runner.configure do |config|
config.after(:suite) do
# shut stuff down h
Well, I've got it half solved. In the shell call, I background &
nohup the mysqld_safe call. After the fork, I do a Process.kill(9,
pid) on each of them. That stops the "run twice" problem. So now I'm
back to the "undefined method `after' for main:Object (NoMethodError)"
problem.
On Oct 28,
Thanks again Dave. I'm slowly learning the world of Rspec :)
On Oct 28, 3:43 pm, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Oct 28, 2009, at 2:05 PM, Brian Cardarella wrote:
>
> > More playing with RSpec-Rails.
>
> > I've noticed that I do not have access to the @request object in
> > before
> > (:all) but do
On Oct 28, 2009, at 2:05 PM, Brian Cardarella wrote:
More playing with RSpec-Rails.
I've noticed that I do not have access to the @request object in
before
(:all) but do in before(:each)
Is this expected behavior?
Yes. In general, before(:all) is intended for setting global state and
sh
More playing with RSpec-Rails.
I've noticed that I do not have access to the @request object in before
(:all) but do in before(:each)
Is this expected behavior?
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo
David, great quick response, thanks - lets hope our action condenses the
nonsense round here.
-- Lee Hambley
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
On Oct 28, 2009, at 1:13 PM, Lee Hambley wrote:
Matt,
Thats a good start, can I suggest adding it to the google group
homepage, whoever has admin control?
That would be me. Done.
Anyone is free to update the http://wiki.github.com/dchelimsky/rspec/get-in-touch
wiki page.
Cheers,
David
Matt,
Thats a good start, can I suggest adding it to the google group homepage,
whoever has admin control?
-- Lee Hambley
Sent from my iPhone.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Some trouble with the list here...
Hmmm... That yields "undefined method `after' for main:Object
(NoMethodError)" ... BUT
I'm pretty sure I'm barking up the wrong tree. I think that I'm
getting hung up with mysqld_safe. I'm running two test servers, which
need to be in separate threads. So I
Looking over things, the problem is probably with fork/exec related.
I need to start mysql (two of them). They need to run in separate
processes. However, I don't seem to be able to "really" exit when I
call exit!. It's the final termination of these processes which
trigger the reruns.
I've tr
Hmmm... That yields "undefined method `after' for main:Object
(NoMethodError)"
... BUT I'm pretty sure I'm barking up the wrong tree. I think that
I'm getting hung up with mysqld_safe. I'm
On Oct 28, 10:49 am, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Oct 28, 2009, at 10:41 AM, Student wrote:
>
> > I need
I did have a crack at writing some 'ground rules' a while back after
we had quite a bit of chump-traffic:
http://wiki.github.com/dchelimsky/rspec/get-in-touch
It would be good to have a single URL we can reply with when people
send these kind of feckless requests. Maybe the problem with that
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> Hello,
> Any updates on the above topic
Please be sure to quote enough of the previous topic so those of us reading
on phones can respond to you.
There is a thread about this on the Cucumber list - please see if this
information helps
On Oct 28, 2009, at 10:41 AM, Student wrote:
I need to perform some work (shutdown mysql servers & delete their
data directories) at the end of my tests. Naturally, I would like to
use at_exit. HOWEVER, when I do, the spec file gets loaded twice (and
the tests are run twice).
Help?
For bett
I need to perform some work (shutdown mysql servers & delete their
data directories) at the end of my tests. Naturally, I would like to
use at_exit. HOWEVER, when I do, the spec file gets loaded twice (and
the tests are run twice).
Help?
___
rspec-user
I loved that 'Let me google that for you' thing that I remember Dave
replying with once.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=rspec+tutorial
-lenny
On Oct 28, 2009, at 10:35 AM, Vishu Ramanathan wrote:
Lee's frustration is not groundless. In my few weeks on this list, I
have noticed a lot of requests for
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Lee Hambley wrote:
>
> Aalso for public record; Hanuma emailed me personally accusing me of racism,
> I apologise if I offended anyone else on the list, but I feel my
> observations were valid, we have similar problems on the Capistrano mailing
> list with frequen
I completely agree with your idea, also the group homepage should have a few
ground rules perhaps, we have something similar on the Capistrano group.
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/
Its a real shame Google groups doesn't have better "first time poster"
rules, for such things.
Aalso f
Lee's frustration is not groundless. In my few weeks on this list, I have
noticed a lot of requests for basic information that could easily be found
with a simple search.
It seems to me that complaining about it here is not going to help, though,
because future offenders are not reading yet.
Perh
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:03 PM, miv wrote:
> Is there a way to user rspec with multiple databases in rails? I have
> several adapters and want to seamlesly run specs on them.I think it is
> appropriate to list all adapters for such feature.
What sorts of problems are you having when you try?
Hello,
Any updates on the above topic
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
2009/10/28 Rails ROR
> Hi All,
>
> I want to test my application with rspec.
>
> In order to test my views, I have written few specs as given in the
> examples.
>
> Is there any way to test the user acceptance?
>
> i.e suppose the field takes a string.
>
> I want to test it for integers, float va
So the problem I was having was because I had a before_filter that was
disabling the magic states for a specific action. I resolved the
problem by changing this to an around filter:
before:
def disable_magic_states
UserSession.disable_magic_states = true
end
after:
def temporarily_disable_ma
Hi All,
I want to test my application with rspec.
In order to test my views, I have written few specs as given in the
examples.
Is there any way to test the user acceptance?
i.e suppose the field takes a string.
I want to test it for integers, float values, alphanumeric values, etc and
run tes
Mr. Hambley,
I am sorry to say this that I didn't post regarding Rspec examples
just for fun.
I was really new to that and I thought that some one would guide me
with more examples, better examples.
But, it is really bad on your part to comment that people from India
post without "searching" an
Is there a way to user rspec with multiple databases in rails? I have
several adapters and want to seamlesly run specs on them.I think it is
appropriate to list all adapters for such feature.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://r
On Oct 28, 2009, at 2:56 AM, zhjie685 wrote:
Hi,
I'm new to rspec.
How could I transform the Unit:Tests code like
def test_logout
login
get :logout
assert_not_logged_in
end
def assert_not_logged_in
assert_block { session["user"].nil? }
end
that a test method invoke anoth
Carlos Souza wrote:
> Amit,
>
> Your controller spec that you said was working was not actually testing
> your
> controller since you were not calling any of your controller methods.
Ok.In that case can you suggest how to call controller methods from the
uppermost code which is running fine an
Em 28-10-2009 00:21, David Chelimsky escreveu:
...
Actually, I've taken a look at Factory Girl, but prefered Machinist,
which is awesome. I'll take a look at Fixjour and Fixture
Replacement. Do they have a blueprint-like feature?
I have no problem in creating methods in ActiveRecord::Base.
Hi,
I'm new to rspec.
How could I transform the Unit:Tests code like
def test_logout
login
get :logout
assert_not_logged_in
end
def assert_not_logged_in
assert_block { session["user"].nil? }
end
that a test method invoke another test method,to repec code.
Should I put th
40 matches
Mail list logo
