Randy Harmon wrote:
On 1/11/10 9:22 PM, Nick Hoffman wrote:
Cheers,
David
Thanks for that, David. I updated my spec (http://codepad.org/F828X7Fg).
For some reason though, it's still failing: http://codepad.org/s65Ckubc
Just in case, this is what I have in routes.rb:
By the way, does this spec:
{:get = '/path'}.should route_to(...)
make this spec redundant?:
params_from(:get, '/path').should == {...}
They read the same, but it feels like they each check one end of the
route's translation.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Question.
Currently rspec appears to allow for a two-step test system, like
context abc
it 'should do y' do
end
end
It might be convenient to have an arbitrary number of nests, like
context abc
it 'should do y' do
it 'should also be able to do x'
end
end
end
Thoughts?
-r
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 4:40 PM, rogerdpack rogerpack2...@gmail.com wrote:
Question.
Currently rspec appears to allow for a two-step test system, like
context abc
it 'should do y' do
end
end
It might be convenient to have an arbitrary number of nests, like
context abc
it 'should do
On 12 Jan 2010, at 22:40, rogerdpack wrote:
Question.
Currently rspec appears to allow for a two-step test system, like
context abc
it 'should do y' do
end
end
It might be convenient to have an arbitrary number of nests, like
context abc
it 'should do y' do
it 'should also be able to
rspec version 1.3.0 has been released!
Thanks for the release.
-r
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Any interest in the following idea?
a.should include?(1:4) # if there's no matcher called include? then
just call include?
or something along those lines?
-r
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
You do realise you can already nest contexts don't you? That makes
much more sense to me than what you've suggested.
Hi Roger,
Here's an example of nesting contexts that Matt is talking about:
http://gist.github.com/275798
Peace,
Phillip
___
David Chelimsky wrote:
MyModel.stub(:find).with(42).and_return(myModel)
Didn't work as expected - I'll do a bit of research and post again.
What is expected? What are you trying to accomplish?
Example in horror-code:
##
class MyController
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Saverio Miroddi li...@ruby-forum.comwrote:
David Chelimsky wrote:
MyModel.stub(:find).with(42).and_return(myModel)
Didn't work as expected - I'll do a bit of research and post again.
What is expected? What are you trying to accomplish?
Example in
Hi,
I'm new to RSpec and Cucumber and I'm following the RSpec book.
I have cucumber gem installed but when I use script/generate cucumber it
responds with Couldn't find 'cucumber' generator?
Thanks,
Onno
___
rspec-users mailing list
Try
gem install cucumber-rails
In a recent release the generators were split from the main project.
Sent from my iPhone
On 13 Jan 2010, at 06:38, Onno van der Straaten onno.van.der.straa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I'm new to RSpec and Cucumber and I'm following the RSpec book.
I have
12 matches
Mail list logo
