On 31 Jan 2011, at 08:26, Pat Maddox wrote:
> I load my XML docs into a hash using Hash#from_xml and then compare the
> hashes.
Bullseye! Thanks Pat.
> On Jan 26, 2011, at 7:26 AM, Matt Wynne wrote:
>
>> I have a problem. I have a test that needs to assert that one XML document
>> looks exac
On Jan 31, 2011, at 3:38 AM, Evgeniy Dolzhenko wrote:
> Btw. there is also before(:suite), and working from there wouldn't it make
> sense to have
>
> 1. before(:suite)
> 2. before(:group)
> 3. before(:example)
>
> which would reflect the hierarchy of RSpec run (i.e. suite > group > example).
On Jan 31, 2011, at 3:38 AM, Evgeniy Dolzhenko wrote:
> Btw. there is also before(:suite), and working from there wouldn't it make
> sense to have
>
> 1. before(:suite)
> 2. before(:group)
> 3. before(:example)
>
> which would reflect the hierarchy of RSpec run (i.e. suite > group > example).
Hey all,
There is a feature request for rspec-core that I'd like to see some opinions
about. The idea is to be able to reference subjects and methods defined with
let() in parent groups from within the subject() and let() methods in a child
group. Two approaches are to use super or a block argu
On 26 Jan 2011, at 15:29, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Jan 26, 2011, at 7:34 AM, Rob Aldred wrote:
>
>> I'm having a bit of trouble stubbing out a method on a model which has some
>> quite specific behaviour.
>> Basically I want to check the method returns something different after ive
>> calle
I cannot use the -l option on a spec that has shared examples definition.
If I try to run with -l value set to a test block that is outside the shared
examples group all it does it runs the tests in the shared examples block
The command line docs have a note saying that the -l option will not wor
By default Rails provides these task to test_unit tests:
> rake -T
rake test:recent # Run tests for
recenttest:prepare / Test recent changes
rake test:uncommitted# Run tests for
uncommittedtest:prepare / Test changes since last checkin (only
Btw. there is also before(:suite), and working from there wouldn't it
make sense to have
1. before(:suite)
2. before(:group)
3. before(:example)
which would reflect the hierarchy of RSpec run (i.e. suite > group >
example).
Anyway likely it's too late to introduce something like this, just m
On Jan 27, 2011, at 6:53 PM, Rick DeNatale wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 6:16 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>> On Jan 27, 2011, at 5:11 PM, John Feminella wrote:
>>
>>> That's not quite right. :each runs before _each_ spec, while :all runs
>>> once, before _any_ spec.
>>
>> Perhaps :any is a b
I load my XML docs into a hash using Hash#from_xml and then compare the hashes.
On Jan 26, 2011, at 7:26 AM, Matt Wynne wrote:
> I have a problem. I have a test that needs to assert that one XML document
> looks exactly like another XML document.
>
> I couldn't find a way to compare them as
10 matches
Mail list logo
