After upgrading to cucumber 0.3.0 from 0.1.16 I'm getting this error when I
try to run a feature:
/Users/steve/src/jruby-1.2.0/lib/ruby/1.8/jcode.rb:66:in `end_regexp': too
short multibyte code string:
/[\xc0-\xdf][\x80-\xbf]|[\xe0-\xef][\x80-\xbf][\x80-\xbf]$/ (RegexpError)
from /Users/steve/src/j
Stephen,
Regarding the exception nagger, would a simple script that grepped the log
file for exceptions and produced a list of failing lines in your code be a
start?
Steve
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Stephen Eley wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Ashley Moran
> wrote:
> >
> > I
Well I'm reading the 0.4.2 webrat rdoc for fill_in, at it says:
"field can be either the value of a name attribute (i.e. user[email]) or the
text inside a element that points at the field."
Does it also try the id?
Steve
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 11:03 AM, James Byrne wrote:
Is there a way to locate and 'fill in' a text field (or check a check box,
select an option, etc.) by id? It seems that the fill_in method takes
either the text of the label pointing to the field or the field name. The
are cases when writing cucumber steps when using the HTML id of the input
elem
gt;> people use your validation code in those spots where you want them to.
>> How does that sound?
Steve
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Zach Dennis wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Steve Molitor
> wrote:
> > I guess that would work.
>
> What would work?
Steve
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Steve Molitor wrote:
> I guess that would work. But a method would probably work too, if I'm
> understanding correctly (often a bad assumption!). I.e. /"(.*)" should be
> a valid date/ would call valid_date?(date), or something.
nse, other times where that would
be too much noise and you want a reference.
Steve
Steve
I don't think you need all 3 steps. OK. "Then" is awkward
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 9:00 PM, Pat Maddox wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Stephen Eley wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 7
s where you want them to.
> How does that sound?
>
> Pat
>
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Steve Molitor
> wrote:
> > Yeah I thought of something like that. Actually we do something like
> that
> > in one step now that I think about it. But I really wanted t
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 9:00 PM, Pat Maddox wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Stephen Eley wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Steve Molitor
> wrote:
> >> Lots of features use the word "should" in their then clauses.
> >> Take this exampl
Yeah I thought of something like that. Actually we do something like that
in one step now that I think about it. But I really wanted to execute the
same exact date feature (for example) doc that the user verified to make
sure nothing got lost in translation. Which I could do if I
programmaticall
eature is clearer to the customer than a spec example.
Steve
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Stephen Eley wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Steve Molitor
> wrote:
> > By a global requirement I'm talking about requirements like 'all emails
> must
> >
Steve
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Matt Wynne wrote:
>
> On 7 Jan 2009, at 17:23, Steve Molitor wrote:
>
> I have two related questions: What is the best way to express global
>> requirements, and how does one do it in Cucumber. The first question is the
>> on
on. That was very important, it was a global
requirement with some important exceptions. But I think your approach would
have worked there as well.
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Pat Maddox wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Steve Molitor
> wrote:
> > I have two related
I have two related questions: What is the best way to express global
requirements, and how does one do it in Cucumber. The first question is the
one I'm most interested in right now.
By a global requirement I'm talking about requirements like 'all emails must
be formatted like this...' Some peop
+1 @ Pat
I was going to respond in more detail, but I do exactly what Pat does --
bang in steps, no bang in Rails apps. The Rails scaffolding boiler plate
generates no bangs.
Steve
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Pat Maddox wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Caius Durling wrote:
> >
What about two steps with the same regex but are of different types -- i.e.
a Given and a Then with the same regexp?
Steve
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 6:07 PM, aslak hellesoy wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:50 PM, Tim Walker wrote:
>
>> Great information guys, making some progress on this en
dashes
-
Am I making sense? I want to specify the date in the features, as there may
be extra requirements like birth dates can not be in the future in addition
to the generic date requirements. And I want to validate that the form
checks for valid dates, displays the appropriate error mes
What's the best way to handle a requirement that shows up as a
sub-requirement requirement in other features? For example let's say users
can enter dates in various forms throughout my application. There is one
set of global rules specifying the formats in which dates may be entered,
and how the
I'm having the following problem:
With the format as html, the output of cucumber stops coloring successful
steps green after step #100. This last line in the HTML is:
stepPassed(100)
Steps 101 -n are colored grey. The tag is not closed but all steps
are displayed. When running with 'for
19 matches
Mail list logo
