Re: [rspec-users] Rails 3 Support/Design

2010-06-12 Thread David Chelimsky
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 5:24 PM, David Chelimsky wrote: > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Rick DeNatale > wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:17 AM, David Chelimsky >> wrote: >>> On Jun 11, 2010, at 10:56 AM, Rick DeNatale wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:10 PM, David Chelimsky >>

Re: [rspec-users] Rails 3 Support/Design

2010-06-11 Thread David Chelimsky
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Rick DeNatale wrote: > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:17 AM, David Chelimsky > wrote: >> On Jun 11, 2010, at 10:56 AM, Rick DeNatale wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:10 PM, David Chelimsky >>> wrote: On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 3:14 PM, geetarista wrote: >

Re: [rspec-users] Rails 3 Support/Design

2010-06-11 Thread Rick DeNatale
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:17 AM, David Chelimsky wrote: > On Jun 11, 2010, at 10:56 AM, Rick DeNatale wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:10 PM, David Chelimsky >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 3:14 PM, geetarista wrote: Since Rspec-Rails 2 is specifically geared toward Rails 3, I'

Re: [rspec-users] Rails 3 Support/Design

2010-06-11 Thread David Chelimsky
On Jun 11, 2010, at 10:56 AM, Rick DeNatale wrote: > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:10 PM, David Chelimsky wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 3:14 PM, geetarista wrote: >>> Since Rspec-Rails 2 is specifically geared toward Rails 3, I'm >>> wondering why it doesn't use railtie, the new generators, etc.

Re: [rspec-users] Rails 3 Support/Design

2010-06-11 Thread Rick DeNatale
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:10 PM, David Chelimsky wrote: > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 3:14 PM, geetarista wrote: >> Since Rspec-Rails 2 is specifically geared toward Rails 3, I'm >> wondering why it doesn't use railtie, the new generators, etc.  Will >> it stay this way or is it planned to support th

Re: [rspec-users] Rails 3 Support/Design

2010-06-11 Thread geetarista
Awesome. Thanks for the clarification! On Jun 10, 1:10 pm, David Chelimsky wrote: > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 3:14 PM, geetarista wrote: > > Since Rspec-Rails 2 is specifically geared toward Rails 3, I'm > > wondering why it doesn't use railtie, the new generators, etc.  Will > > it stay this way

Re: [rspec-users] Rails 3 Support/Design

2010-06-10 Thread David Chelimsky
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 3:14 PM, geetarista wrote: > Since Rspec-Rails 2 is specifically geared toward Rails 3, I'm > wondering why it doesn't use railtie, the new generators, etc.  Will > it stay this way or is it planned to support that? It does use the new generators, and we do have a railtie,

[rspec-users] Rails 3 Support/Design

2010-06-10 Thread geetarista
Since Rspec-Rails 2 is specifically geared toward Rails 3, I'm wondering why it doesn't use railtie, the new generators, etc. Will it stay this way or is it planned to support that? ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.