Of the options on the table, I prefer "using $placeholder values" because
then it tells me the role the value plays in the sentence. Even Pat's
version works by defining the $placeholders outside of the step.
In a "library" somewhere (we still need to define what a story/step library
is or looks l
On 10/14/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/14/07, Zach Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/14/07, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 10/14/07, Zach Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Does it add any value to even add things like "Joe" and "Acme" into
On 10/14/07, Zach Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/14/07, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/14/07, Zach Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Does it add any value to even add things like "Joe" and "Acme" into a
> > > story part? It seems like that is an implementation deta
On 10/14/07, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/14/07, Zach Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does it add any value to even add things like "Joe" and "Acme" into a
> > story part? It seems like that is an implementation detail of your
> > story.
> >
> > Who cares about "Joe" or "Acme
On 10/14/07, Zach Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does it add any value to even add things like "Joe" and "Acme" into a
> story part? It seems like that is an implementation detail of your
> story.
>
> Who cares about "Joe" or "Acme", don't you just care that you have a
> user who works for a c
Does it add any value to even add things like "Joe" and "Acme" into a
story part? It seems like that is an implementation detail of your
story.
Who cares about "Joe" or "Acme", don't you just care that you have a
user who works for a company. And if that company has a particular
trait wouldn't it
When I first used story runner I thought the same option would be needed.
Then I thought about it then came to the conclusion that it would be more
clear to write something such as:
Given a user named, Joe
And a company named, Acme
And user works for, Acme
And user is a, Janitor
On 10/14/07, Andy
Zach Dennis-2 wrote:
>
> I like to keep them closer to customer readable/writable myself.
>
Customer readable/writable stories are important for me too.
To that end, I would prefer inline, Option 1.
1. And "the user", "Joe", "works for", "Acme", "as a", "janitor"
2. And "the user $user works
On 10/13/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> And "the user", "Joe", "works for", "Acme", "as a", "janitor"
I vote no on this.
>
> And "the user $user works for $company as a $jobtitle", "Joe", "Acme",
> "janitor"
If these are the two choices then this one is better, but this does
On 10/13/07, Dan North <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Or even:
>
> And "the user", "Joe", "works for", "Acme", "as a", "janitor"
>
> so the params are inline.
Dan - I know we discussed that possibility, but don't recall where we
left the conversation. I think we were supposed to discuss this more
at
Or even:
And "the user", "Joe", "works for", "Acme", "as a", "janitor"
so the params are inline.
On 10/13/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 10/13/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/12/07, Tasty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Fistly, many, many
On 10/13/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/12/07, Tasty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Fistly, many, many thanks for RSpec and Story Runner.
> >
> > Minor request to improve readability of output
> >
> > Given a scenario item with multiple params..
> > Eg. And "the user be
On 10/12/07, Tasty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Fistly, many, many thanks for RSpec and Story Runner.
>
> Minor request to improve readability of output
>
> Given a scenario item with multiple params..
> Eg. And "the user belongs to", "Joe", "Acme" do |user_name, company_name|
>
> The readabilit
Fistly, many, many thanks for RSpec and Story Runner.
Minor request to improve readability of output
Given a scenario item with multiple params..
Eg. And "the user belongs to", "Joe", "Acme" do |user_name, company_name|
The readability of the following output is less than ideal..
"And the us
14 matches
Mail list logo
