> Are you sure you are running the outer-most group, and not an inner
> group or example? I just tried this file as test.spec.rb:
>describe "add_descendants_from_xml" do
> it "should add descendants" do
>true.should be_false
> end
>
> describe "with attributes" do
>
On 20 Mar 2008, at 14:31, Max Williams wrote:
> Sorry to be pedantic, but shouldn't that be
> "Your needs may differ from mine"? There's no party called 'mine', so
> 'mine' has no needs :)
A quick google for "those of mine" brings back a google book hit for
Shakespeare so maybe Edvard was bei
Edvard Majakari wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 1:12 AM, Ashley Moran
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > sufficient to me, but of course, YNMDFTOM.
>
>> Please put me out of my misery and explain the acronym :D
>
> My bad. My favorite hobby is to invent new acronyms on the fly, of
> which th
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 1:12 AM, Ashley Moran
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > sufficient to me, but of course, YNMDFTOM.
> Please put me out of my misery and explain the acronym :D
My bad. My favorite hobby is to invent new acronyms on the fly, of
which the one concerned is an example.
It is sh
On 10 Mar 2008, at 12:42, Edvard Majakari wrote:
> Being able to choose which
> contexts/describes or individual specs will be run has been more than
> sufficient to me, but of course, YNMDFTOM.
Hi Edvard
Sorry for the delayed reaction, but was just catching up on old posts
and saw this. I
James Deville wrote:
> Using the -e option from the command line, you can also specify a
> string which is to be run, this is a way to run only one describe
> block, or one it block. The rake task method suggested by Edvard is
> the other option
I'm having problems with the -e option - it doesn't
Using the -e option from the command line, you can also specify a
string which is to be run, this is a way to run only one describe
block, or one it block. The rake task method suggested by Edvard is
the other option
On Mar 10, 2008, at 5:42 AM, Edvard Majakari wrote:
>> The idea is that y
> The idea is that you can specify that certain tests exist in groups,
> and can be run as a set. You can define groups and groups of groups,
> and so you can run a set of functional tests or all the tests dealing
> with a specific feature without running through the entire thing.
> It's kind
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 9:11 AM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Will Sargent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > One of the things I really liked about TestNG was the grouping
> > feature. Are there any plans for rSpec to incorporate that? Is there
>
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Will Sargent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One of the things I really liked about TestNG was the grouping
> feature. Are there any plans for rSpec to incorporate that? Is there
> any way to emulate that functionality in rspec?
I'm not familiar with the feature yo
One of the things I really liked about TestNG was the grouping
feature. Are there any plans for rSpec to incorporate that? Is there
any way to emulate that functionality in rspec?
Will.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://ruby
11 matches
Mail list logo
