Re: [rspec-users] testing framework in 44 lines of ruby

2011-06-13 Thread Pat Maddox
On Jun 12, 2011, at 10:52 AM, Patrick J. Collins wrote: >> What do you mean by "on target"? Are you asking if the implementations are >> the same, or similar? Or are you asking if attest meets the same goals as >> RSpec? > > More specifically, I meant the way he implements describe blocks and the

Re: [rspec-users] testing framework in 44 lines of ruby

2011-06-12 Thread David Chelimsky
On Jun 12, 2011, at 12:52 PM, Patrick J. Collins wrote: >> What do you mean by "on target"? Are you asking if the implementations are >> the same, or similar? Or are you asking if attest meets the same goals as >> RSpec? > > More specifically, I meant the way he implements describe blocks and th

Re: [rspec-users] testing framework in 44 lines of ruby

2011-06-12 Thread Patrick J. Collins
> What do you mean by "on target"? Are you asking if the implementations are > the same, or similar? Or are you asking if attest meets the same goals as > RSpec? More specifically, I meant the way he implements describe blocks and the should method... It's difficult for me to tell from glancing t

Re: [rspec-users] testing framework in 44 lines of ruby

2011-06-12 Thread David Chelimsky
On Jun 12, 2011, at 11:26 AM, Patrick J. Collins wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I just came across this post and was wondering if this is on target with how > RSpec works under the hood? > > http://www.skorks.com/2011/02/a-unit-testing-framework-in-44-lines-of-ruby/ What do you mean by "on target"?

[rspec-users] testing framework in 44 lines of ruby

2011-06-12 Thread Patrick J. Collins
Hi everyone, I just came across this post and was wondering if this is on target with how RSpec works under the hood? http://www.skorks.com/2011/02/a-unit-testing-framework-in-44-lines-of-ruby/ Patrick J. Collins http://collinatorstudios.com ___ rspec