Dave Dykstra wrote:
>
> Note that his case is rather pathological because he's got over a million
> files in only 400 directories, so he must have an average of over 2500
> files per directory, which are very large directories. He's got about 65%
> of the files explicitly listed in his --include-
On 30 Oct 2001, Dave Dykstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know there's no patent on it, and other people have done implementations.
> The "resources" page on rsync.samba.org points to a REXX implementation.
> Josh Macdonald wrote an implementation in C
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/xdelt
> sun/amdahl/unixware patch
All these are applied now. I changed the library routines to just
include rsync.h
--
Martin
On 28 Nov 2001, Dave Dykstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The HP compiler needs a -Ae to accept ANSI.
Sadly the compiler on this machine reports:
configure:5002: cc -c -Ae -DHAVE_CONFIG_H conftest.c >&5
(Bundled) cc: warning 480: The -A option is available only with the C/ANSI C product;
igno
I agree with this - a perl script to generate a list of "includes" from a list of
directories
is not hard to write (below in "long and readable" rather than compact perly
form), and what about --python and --awk:
#cat frag.pl
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
# frag.pl - perl fragment for generating include l
Hello Dave,
thank You for Your time; sorry I didn't included my rsyncd.conf. As I
said, on two other machines with EXACTLY the same config file and EXACTLY
the same passwd entries for nobody and nogroup = same ID's, it works
perfectly. EXECTLY the same permissions on target directory alos ofcours
Ooooh! I love this sort of thing - helps debugging problems, and in making
decisions such as "have I got time to go for a coffee while this is
cranking". 2.4.7pre5 please.
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Martin Pool wrote:
> Any votes for/against?
>
>
> - Forwarded message from Rik Faith <[EMAIL PROT
Any votes for/against?
- Forwarded message from Rik Faith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 12:55:29 -0500
From: Rik Faith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: rsync patch
X-Mailer: VM 6.96; XEmacs 21.1; Linux 2.4.16 (light)
Here is a patch that adds rate infor
You probably need to set
read only = no
in rsyncd.conf.
- Dave
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 04:29:35PM +0100, Rok Krulec wrote:
> Hello,
>
> when I do:
> /opt/rsync/bin/rsync /etc/hosts targethost::bkp/
>
> I get:
> cannot create .hosts.b0WX1x : File exists
>
> I check the targethost and I get
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 09:23:18AM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 28 Nov 2001, Dave Dykstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 04:03:58PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > rsync -avu --include 'tmp1/*/*.c' --include "*/" --exclude "*" tmp1 tmp2
> > >
> > > The above comman
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 09:11:58AM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
...
> > 1. remove AC_FUNC_MEMCMP from configure.in because it causes Sunos
> > 4.1.4 to die. memcmp() there fails the "8-bit clean" test, but it
> > doesn't matter because memcmp() in rsync is only used to test if
> > so
On 28 Nov 2001, Dave Dykstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 04:03:58PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > rsync -avu --include 'tmp1/*/*.c' --include "*/" --exclude "*" tmp1 tmp2
> >
> > The above command copies all the empty directories under tmp1/ . Is there
> > any way t
On 28 Nov 2001, Dave Dykstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, I had seen it but haven't volunteered my build machines because the
> build servers download code to execute over the open internet using only
> an rsync server, which gives no assurance that it hasn't been spoofed.
> Hopefully after
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 10:26:35AM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
...
> I'm not sure if you've seen this:
>
> http://build.samba.org:80/build.pl?tree=rsync&function=Recent+Builds
>
> It's a pretty good tool, since I don't have direct access to (for
> example) a CRAY. The downside is that it requir
Rsync list: Alberto and I have done a couple more exchanges by private
email, and we found that he wasn't turning on my include/exclude
optimization in his test because he had an "exclude" directive in
rsyncd.conf. He has now removed that and run the test again. His very
interesting results are
Dave Dykstra wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 04:03:58PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > rsync -avu --include 'tmp1/*/*.c' --include "*/" --exclude "*" tmp1 tmp2
> >
> > The above command copies all the empty directories under tmp1/ . Is there
> > any way to avoid it?
>
> Currently the onl
Excellent work, Martin (and any others involved). No more hangs, and
the more consistent
and complete messages at the different levels of verbose are great. The
"why is a path included
or excluded" messages at -vv should cut the traffic on this list by
about 25% (I wish I'd had them
a couple of
Dave Dykstra wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 04:03:58PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > rsync -avu --include 'tmp1/*/*.c' --include "*/" --exclude "*" tmp1 tmp2
> >
> > The above command copies all the empty directories under tmp1/ . Is there
> > any way to avoid it?
>
> Currently the onl
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 02:38:04PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 27 Nov 2001, Dave Madole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The bug has something to do with verbosity - it works fine without verbosity
> > on. The irony, of course, is that one turns verbosity on to fix these things
> > (I have
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 04:03:58PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> rsync -avu --include 'tmp1/*/*.c' --include "*/" --exclude "*" tmp1 tmp2
>
> The above command copies all the empty directories under tmp1/ . Is there
> any way to avoid it?
Currently the only way is to explicitly include the p
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 10:55:55AM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 27 Nov 2001, Dave Dykstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Unfortunately there is no way to search the archive. That would be very
> > useful.
>
> Just use google and say
>
> site:lists.samba.org rsync mbp prototype
>
> or
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 05:00:14PM -0500, Lenny Foner wrote:
...
> [ . . . ]
>
> I'm pretty sure that rsync won't use up memory for excluded files so it
> would make no difference.
>
> ...though this also implies (since you say it'd probably use basically
> the same mechanism interna
Hello,
when I do:
/opt/rsync/bin/rsync /etc/hosts targethost::bkp/
I get:
cannot create .hosts.b0WX1x : File exists
I check the targethost and I get empty file .hosts.b0WX1x
When trying with other targethost-s it works, but on this one it doesn't.
On the other targethosts I have exactly the sa
Robert,
>From our testing we did recently on Sun Solaris 2.6 then RSync copies the
file up to the point at which it was last saved (i.e. before it was opened
for editing). Dave & Martin will probably tell you that you shouldn't use
Rsync on open files (results are undefined), but for the moment
Hello all
I have been watching and learning from this list for a couple of months
now.. Here is my first question.
If rsync comes across a file that is in use by somebody. What happens?
Does the file get skipped or does the entire transfer halt?
The command I am issuing is:
rsync -a -c -v -o -e
> Rsync currently doesn't do that.
That explains why I couldn't find anything usable on the man-page. :)
> Would it suit your purposes if 'rsync -n'
> reported the statistics of what it would transfer if -n were not used
> rather that what it reports now (which appears to be the number of
> by
26 matches
Mail list logo
