On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 01:25:06PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 12 Jun 2003, jw schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Leave the communications protocol to the communications
> > layer. You don't save anything by coding reordering and
> > retransmission at the packet level; that is infrastruc
On 12 Jun 2003, jw schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Leave the communications protocol to the communications
> layer. You don't save anything by coding reordering and
> retransmission at the packet level; that is infrastructure.
>
> Connectionless is fine. Lightweight sessions is better. If
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 05:59:43PM -0700, Vlad Sweet wrote:
> My setup rsync --version 2.5.5
> on client and server
> client is behind firewall/nat
>
> on client I run:
> rsync -av --progress 110mb_file.mov [EMAIL PROTECTED]::dir1
> on server:
> rsync --daemon
>
> it asks for password, starts to
On 13 Jun 2003, Martin Pool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why run this _only_ over TCP? Obviously you don't want to re-invent TCP/IP
> > error handling, but the protocol shouldn't rely on such a system. File
> > transfer can potentially run connectionless.
>
> It sounds like you're talking abo
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 10:34:18AM +1000, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 12 Jun 2003, Brad Hards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why run this _only_ over TCP? Obviously you don't want to re-invent TCP/IP
> > error handling, but the protocol shouldn't rely on such a system. File
> > transfer can potential
My setup rsync --version 2.5.5
on client and server
client is behind firewall/nat
on client I run:
rsync -av --progress 110mb_file.mov [EMAIL PROTECTED]::dir1
on server:
rsync --daemon
it asks for password, starts to transfer the file, and at about 80% gives me
this error message:
<<==cut==>>
Pa
On 12 Jun 2003, Brad Hards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 11:25 am, Martin Pool wrote:
> > That could be a pretty nice thing. We use little rsync shares on
> > workstations here for sharing files, and I know some people do the
> > same with FTP.
> >
> > What aside
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 11:25 am, Martin Pool wrote:
> That could be a pretty nice thing. We use little rsync shares on
> workstations here for sharing files, and I know some people do the
> same with FTP.
>
> What aside from SLP would make this more usef
