Rsync password not working

2005-02-25 Thread Sajida
Hi,  I have installed CYGWIN in my windows 2000 prof machine .I want to automate the RSYNC backup .The rsync --password-file=filename doesn't seems to work .If i schedule the backup , the rsync asks for password atthe scheduled time .Please help me to automate the Rsync without asking pa

Rsync password not working

2005-02-25 Thread Abdul Salam, Sajida (Cognizant)
Title: Rsync password not working Hi, I have installed CYGWIN in my windows 2000 machine .I want to automate the RSYNC backup .The rsync --password-file=filename doesn't seems to work .If i schedule the backup , the rsync asks for password at the scheduled time .Please help me to automate t

Re: How to control rsync log?

2005-02-25 Thread Terry Dooher
If I specify this option on a 2.6.3 server config, will it still be effective even if the clients are 2.6.0 (or possibly 2.5.6, I'm still pestering them to upgrade) Terry. Wayne Davison wrote: On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 12:35:21PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a way to let rsync server t

[Bug 2094] Keep the last-sync time for better two-way synchronization

2005-02-25 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2094 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: How to control rsync log?

2005-02-25 Thread Wayne Davison
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 12:39:40PM +, Terry Dooher wrote: > If I specify this option on a 2.6.3 server config, will it still be > effective even if the clients are 2.6.0 (or possibly 2.5.6, I'm still > pestering them to upgrade) Yes. It controls what the server does, which is to not allow t

Re: Rsync password not working

2005-02-25 Thread Wayne Davison
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 05:52:16PM +0530, Abdul Salam, Sajida (Cognizant) wrote: > The rsync --password-file=filename doesn't seems to work. That option specifies a file that is used when talking to an rsync daemon. If you're using a remote-shell (such as ssh or rsh), you'll need to configure it

[Bug 2240] Add last-match/short-circuit processing of include/exclude

2005-02-25 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2240 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-25 10:05 --- I considered the short-circuit operators (-! and +!) for filter commands, but I am not convinced of their utility. Do you have an example of a real-life situation that

[Bug 2240] Add last-match/short-circuit processing of include/exclude

2005-02-25 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2240 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-25 10:00 --- Created an attachment (id=985) --> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=985&action=view) Add optional last-match parsing Here's a simple patch that allows any

[Bug 1479] request the addition of a --copy-dest option that would copy identical files

2005-02-25 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1479 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

Request to include delete-dir-and-suffix patch in rsync-2.6.4

2005-02-25 Thread Marc St-Onge
The delete-dir-and-suffix patch creates two new command line options as follows: --delete-dir --delete-suffix The delete-dir and delete-suffix options give the ability to store backup of deleted files on the receiver in different directories or with different suffix than the backup

[Bug 1508] Using options --modify-window and --password-file cause error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12)

2005-02-25 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1508 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Additional Comments

Re: Request to include delete-dir-and-suffix patch in rsync-2.6.4

2005-02-25 Thread Wayne Davison
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 01:09:36PM -0500, Marc St-Onge wrote: > The delete-dir and delete-suffix options give the ability to store > backup of deleted files on the receiver in different directories or > with different suffix than the backup of files that have been changed > but that are still on th

[Bug 1476] Unexplained timout at end of file transfer.

2005-02-25 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1476 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-25 12:53 --- I've had rsync problems intermittantly in Gentoo. Gentoo uses rsync within portage package management system. Typically users run "emerge sync" to update their portage

[Bug 1476] Unexplained timout at end of file transfer.

2005-02-25 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1476 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED --- Additional Comments

data set changes

2005-02-25 Thread Dale Bohl
Hi all, Here's my story. I have 3 hosts, 1 remote and 2 local. We'll say for the sake of clarity that h1 is remote and h2 is the local rsync pull host and h3 is also a local host on the net. Using rsync, I want to pull a data set first from h1 to both h2 and h3. The first pull copies all the

Re: data set changes

2005-02-25 Thread Wayne Davison
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 04:02:24PM -0600, Dale Bohl wrote: >When I run rsync again the next week on h2, I want to write any changes > that have occurred to the data set to a sperate directory on h2. > Those changes must then be burned to a DVD and then sneakernetted to h3 > for an update to the

Feature request: Being able specify that the destination should follow source directory structure.

2005-02-25 Thread Hans Deragon
Greetings. If I do this: rsync --hard-links one.server.com::"module/somedir/images/redhat/3.0WS/en/os/i386 module/someotherdir/1.0/images/redhat/3.0WS/en/os/i386" /export/distros I get: /export/distros/i386/... and a conflict between the two sources. I want for destination: /export/distros/i

[Bug 1476] Unexplained timout at end of file transfer.

2005-02-25 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1476 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-25 16:07 --- The CVS code now handles the case where the generator is taking too long between writes -- it either flushes any buffered data in the output buffer after timeout/2 secon

[Bug 2389] block/character devices on Solaris yield wacky rsync stats

2005-02-25 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2389 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 1937] timeout in data send/receive

2005-02-25 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1937 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: Feature request: Being able specify that the destination should follow source directory structure.

2005-02-25 Thread Wayne Davison
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 06:13:53PM -0500, Hans Deragon wrote: > Because I want to maintain the hard links, I do not want to run two > separate rsync commands to perform this copying. You might be able to use two separate runs and --link-dest to get what you want: COMMON=images/redhat/3.0WS/en/os/

[Bug 2208] cygwin version of rsync sometimes hangs

2005-02-25 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2208 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-25 16:58 --- Has anyone tried commenting out HAVE_SOCKETPAIR from config.h to see if that is the problem? I mentioned somewhere that this seems to be the common case of failure -- i

[Bug 2357] error when compiling rsync under Windows Services for Unix

2005-02-25 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2357 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 2328] cygwin rsync hangs when initiated remotely after transfering some files

2005-02-25 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2328 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Additional Comments