On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 12:19 +0530, Jignesh Shah wrote:
> Thanks Matt, does that means, in incremental recursion (to create the
> missin dirs), --implied-dirs/--no-implied-dirs has no importance?
It is incremental recursion that has no importance. You'll get the same
result with or without increme
O... If I am not wrong then this behavior is same from older
rsync2.6.0 to latest rsync3.0.6.
Thanks.
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 12:19 +0530, Jignesh Shah wrote:
> > Thanks Matt, does that means, in incremental recursion (to create the
> >
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 12:49 +0530, Jignesh Shah wrote:
> O... If I am not wrong then this behavior is same from older
> rsync2.6.0 to latest rsync3.0.6.
That's correct.
--
Matt
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Matt McCutchen
wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 12:19 +0530, Jignesh Shah wro
Hi, I am wondering how rsync-3.0.6 react if it encounters ESTALE error while
synching? If I remember correctly then the rsync-2.6.0 skipping that
file/dir in case of ESTALE error.
Jignesh.
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change option
Both 10.4.x servers (rsync client and server) are bound to AD and permissions
on these folders are assigned based on AD users or groups.
When i checked again this am, i noticed that permissions and ACLs did
propagate properly... don't know what changed but seems fine now...
Thank you for your ti
Did you try compiling your java code to native machine code, with gcj http://gcc.gnu.org/java/
?
Le 19 mai 09 à 05:26, Hasanat Kazmi a écrit :
I want to embed it into a program. So putting in these two will
create licensing issues for me. Any guide of those specif portions
of code where it
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6376
Summary: Trailing slashes avoid creating directories in daemon
mode
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.6
Platform: x64
OS/Version: FreeBSD
Status: NEW
Severity: enh
Well, in this case it seems clear to me that you will have to rewrite
rsync entirely, keeping the delta algorithm and network protocol...
Such a huge work! Good luck.
Le 19 mai 09 à 17:30, Hasanat Kazmi a écrit :
I didn't but even if I do, I wont be able to use some of the native
functions
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6376
--- Comment #1 from m...@mattmccutchen.net 2009-05-19 10:46 CST ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> This behaviour would be useful in daemon mode, so that
> rsync -av host::module/lower/ /dest/
> does not create a directory /dest/lower/ but c
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6378
Summary: "rsync -v -rsync -v --inplace --progress --rsh=ssh -a"
reports erroneous and completely unrealistic transferred
size
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.6
Platform: x
The manual says that without --recursive directories are (noisily)
skiped. However with --relative intermediate directories are created.
So what happens if you give only -R? Is -d the default? And what
happens when you give -R --no-dirs? I tried and it seems that
intermediate dirs are considered an
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 16:16 -0300, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
> The manual says that without --recursive directories are (noisily)
> skiped. However with --relative intermediate directories are created.
> So what happens if you give only -R? Is -d the default? And what
> happens when you give -R --no-
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6378
m...@mattmccutchen.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 15:49 +0530, Jignesh Shah wrote:
> Hi, I am wondering how rsync-3.0.6 react if it encounters ESTALE error
> while synching? If I remember correctly then the rsync-2.6.0 skipping
> that file/dir in case of ESTALE error.
If rsync encounters any kind of error reading a source fi
Thanks Matt but I think that should not be a correct behavior. The rsync
should retry the ESTALE files rather than giving errors immediately and
deleting the files untimely.
Jignesh.
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 15:49 +0530, Jignesh Shah wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Julian Pace Ross wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a file that changes slightly in size every day and has the timestamp
> appended to it.. for example on the 14th may:
> MybackedUpFileBlabla_200905140219.bak
> This is transferred by rsync to another server.
> The next day that
16 matches
Mail list logo