Re: incremental directory searche in rsync 3.0.6

On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 12:19 +0530, Jignesh Shah wrote: > Thanks Matt, does that means, in incremental recursion (to create the > missin dirs), --implied-dirs/--no-implied-dirs has no importance? It is incremental recursion that has no importance. You'll get the same result with or without increme

Re: incremental directory searche in rsync 3.0.6

O... If I am not wrong then this behavior is same from older rsync2.6.0 to latest rsync3.0.6. Thanks. On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote: > On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 12:19 +0530, Jignesh Shah wrote: > > Thanks Matt, does that means, in incremental recursion (to create the > >

Re: incremental directory searche in rsync 3.0.6

On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 12:49 +0530, Jignesh Shah wrote: > O... If I am not wrong then this behavior is same from older > rsync2.6.0 to latest rsync3.0.6. That's correct. -- Matt On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote: > > > On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 12:19 +0530, Jignesh Shah wro

ESTALE error while synching

Hi, I am wondering how rsync-3.0.6 react if it encounters ESTALE error while synching? If I remember correctly then the rsync-2.6.0 skipping that file/dir in case of ESTALE error. Jignesh. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change option

Re: rsync 3.0.6 ACLs under MacOS 10.4

Both 10.4.x servers (rsync client and server) are bound to AD and permissions on these folders are assigned based on AD users or groups. When i checked again this am, i noticed that permissions and ACLs did propagate properly... don't know what changed but seems fine now... Thank you for your ti

Re: Possibility to porting Rsync to NT and other platforms

Did you try compiling your java code to native machine code, with gcj http://gcc.gnu.org/java/ ? Le 19 mai 09 à 05:26, Hasanat Kazmi a écrit : I want to embed it into a program. So putting in these two will create licensing issues for me. Any guide of those specif portions of code where it

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6376] New: Trailing slashes avoid creating directories in daemon mode

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6376 Summary: Trailing slashes avoid creating directories in daemon mode Product: rsync Version: 3.0.6 Platform: x64 OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: enh

Re: Possibility to porting Rsync to NT and other platforms

Well, in this case it seems clear to me that you will have to rewrite rsync entirely, keeping the delta algorithm and network protocol... Such a huge work! Good luck. Le 19 mai 09 à 17:30, Hasanat Kazmi a écrit : I didn't but even if I do, I wont be able to use some of the native functions

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6376] Trailing slashes avoid creating directories in daemon mode

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6376 --- Comment #1 from m...@mattmccutchen.net 2009-05-19 10:46 CST --- (In reply to comment #0) > This behaviour would be useful in daemon mode, so that > rsync -av host::module/lower/ /dest/ > does not create a directory /dest/lower/ but c

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6378] New: "rsync -v -rsync -v --inplace --progress --rsh=ssh -a" reports erroneous and completely unrealistic transferred size

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6378 Summary: "rsync -v -rsync -v --inplace --progress --rsh=ssh -a" reports erroneous and completely unrealistic transferred size Product: rsync Version: 3.0.6 Platform: x

--relative, --dirs and --delete without --recursive

The manual says that without --recursive directories are (noisily) skiped. However with --relative intermediate directories are created. So what happens if you give only -R? Is -d the default? And what happens when you give -R --no-dirs? I tried and it seems that intermediate dirs are considered an

Re: --relative, --dirs and --delete without --recursive

On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 16:16 -0300, Carlos Carvalho wrote: > The manual says that without --recursive directories are (noisily) > skiped. However with --relative intermediate directories are created. > So what happens if you give only -R? Is -d the default? And what > happens when you give -R --no-

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6378] "rsync -v -rsync -v --inplace --progress --rsh=ssh -a" reports erroneous and completely unrealistic transferred size

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6378 m...@mattmccutchen.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: ESTALE error while synching

On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 15:49 +0530, Jignesh Shah wrote: > Hi, I am wondering how rsync-3.0.6 react if it encounters ESTALE error > while synching? If I remember correctly then the rsync-2.6.0 skipping > that file/dir in case of ESTALE error. If rsync encounters any kind of error reading a source fi

Re: ESTALE error while synching

Thanks Matt but I think that should not be a correct behavior. The rsync should retry the ESTALE files rather than giving errors immediately and deleting the files untimely. Jignesh. On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Matt McCutchen wrote: > On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 15:49 +0530, Jignesh Shah wrote:

Re: --fuzzy question

On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Julian Pace Ross wrote: > Hi, > I have a file that changes slightly in size every day and has the timestamp > appended to it.. for example on the 14th may: > MybackedUpFileBlabla_200905140219.bak > This is transferred by rsync to another server. > The next day that