On 9/16/2009 11:11 AM, Andrew Gideon wrote:
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:01:04 +, Andrew Gideon wrote:
It can also potentially be extended in other directions. For one crazy
example, the utility (or some other utility that modifies the first
utilities configuration) could listen on a port for me
On 9/15/2009 9:48 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 21:13 -0400, Lee Winter wrote:
The purpose of this note is to inquire about your collective interest
in optimizing rsync for certain uses, particularly atomic,
unidirectional transfers with few or single writer and many, often
ver
On 9/14/2009 3:55 PM, Andrew Gideon wrote:
If there is one or more bottleneck link in the network (places where
traffic feeds from one or more links with aggregate larger capacity
into a link with smaller capacity) then it makes sense that this work
has to be done on the router that is on the se
On 9/14/2009 9:25 AM, Andrew Gideon wrote:
So control is most effective at the sending rsync, which suggests that
bwlimit is a good approach. But the most information is available at the
receiving router, suggesting that shaping at the router is also a good
approach.
Interesting.
Exactly wha
On 9/13/2009 9:20 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Sun, 2009-09-13 at 21:02 -0400, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
I am using rsync to back up across a VPN. Unfortunately, every so often the
home office miscreants drop a big block of data into the backup and that
particular backup cycle takes many hours
I am using rsync to back up across a VPN. Unfortunately, every so often the
home office miscreants drop a big block of data into the backup and that
particular backup cycle takes many hours. These same people also complain when
net pipe is filled during the day.
What I need is an ability to
wondering if anyone has built a native port yet. It looks like I may have to go
through eliminate delta copy from a half a dozen machines because of transfer
lockups. Conversation on the rsnapshot list indicates that using cygwin may be
the source of my problems.
"""Yes, there's a well-known Cyg
running rsnapshot for backing up Windows PCs, I'm getting an error message that
looks like:
rsync: readlink "/Administrator/My Documents/MIT
OpenCourseware/DiscreteTimeSignalProcessing/6-341Fall-2005/6-341Fall-2005/NR/rdonlyres/Electrical-Engineering-and-Computer-Science/6-341Fall-2005/244BA331
Milutin Voinivich wrote:
How to use murk when rsync entire directory?
I expect in conjunction with find.
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Eric S. Johansson wrote:
Eric S. Johansson wrote:
Matt McCutchen wrote:
bOn Mon, 2007-12-24 at 18:34 -0500, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
I'd love for the remote backup to be encrypted locally so one could
backup to a hostile host.
That limits your options.
one would think. For now, le
Eric S. Johansson wrote:
Matt McCutchen wrote:
bOn Mon, 2007-12-24 at 18:34 -0500, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
I'd love for the remote backup to be encrypted locally so one could
backup to a hostile host.
That limits your options.
one would think. For now, lets go with the plaintext
Matt McCutchen wrote:
Eric,
Sorry for the slow response.
no problem. You're the one who's doing me a favor so take the time you need.
Yes, encryption done with --source-filter would work essentially that
way. The downside compared to something like duplicity is that the
backup host gets to
Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-28 at 00:15 -0500, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
it is possible, I've seen it done, but I can't find the library/tool anymore.
I'm curious: what was the nature of this tool (if you remember)? A
modified version of rsync? A dispersed storage
Charles Marcus wrote:
I'd rather see rsync support something like this (if it is even possible
or practical):
http://www.cleversafe.org/dispersed-storage/how-it-works
it is possible, I've seen it done, but I can't find the library/tool anymore.
again with a pre and post processing capabilit
Matt McCutchen wrote:
bOn Mon, 2007-12-24 at 18:34 -0500, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
I'd love for the remote backup to be encrypted locally so one could
backup to a hostile host.
That limits your options.
one would think. For now, lets go with the plaintext push form of rsnapshot.
a
Matt McCutchen wrote:
- Are you backing up just your own laptop, or should the setup accommodate
multiple machines?
seems to me that the first is a subset of the latter
- Is it a priority to keep the client script simple?
it would be nice but hiding complexity behind a good ui is ok too.
Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Sun, 2007-11-18 at 17:45 -0500, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
Using some of the techniques you show here, it would be possible to trigger the
backup process and push the data from the laptop.
Yes, push backups can be done quite elegantly by pushing the new data to
a
Matt McCutchen wrote:
...
thanks for the suggestions. This gives me some options to work with. I really
like the idea of the post-xfer exec option but unfortunately, my installed
rsync is a bit old (2.6.6) and I'm not exactly keen on trashing my environment
with tarball installs because o
I'm looking to see of it is practical to have an rsync server run a script after
a transfer finishes. I am moving files (python source) from windows (common
point of development) to a few linux machines. big problem being
owner/group/perms are always wrong and python's module install process i
Imran Hussain wrote:
Try DeltaCopy from http://aboutmyx.com. It is a Windows wrapper around
rsync.
this is broken for me. I don't get the buttons on the right hand side
of the files/folders to copy box no matter what size I set the enclosing
box to.
--
To unsubscribe or change options: ht
20 matches
Mail list logo
