Re: Trailing Slash Inconsistencies

machine. The script pulls all relevant information from a database and dynamically constructs the command. The module backup is the root of the server and I need the path on the destination to be relative to root. The destination will always be /home/backup1/hostname/stage. Thanks, Mark On Tue

Trailing Slash Inconsistencies

Hello, I am noticing inconsistencies when using a trailing slash on the source directories in conjunction with the '--delete' option. In one instance when using a trailing slash files get deleted from subdirectories in the destination tree. In the other instance they don't. I am using rsync

Any work-around for very large number of files yet?

these after the cutover with tar, rather than the few hours it would take with rsync -- this is making for some angry users. If anyone has a work-around, I'd very much appreciate it. Thanks, Mark Crowder Texas Instruments, KFAB Computer Engineering email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Any work-around for very large number of files yet?

JW (and others), Thanks for the input. --whole-file did indeed allow it to reach the failure point faster... I've been experimenting with find/cpio, and there's probably an answer there. Thanks Again, Mark -Original Message- From: jw schultz [mailto:jw;pegasys.ws] Sent: Monday

rsync not reporting perm/owner diffs in dryrun

)? * Any other related issue people come up with ... Mark -- Mark Santcroos RIPE Network Coordination Centre http://www.ripe.net/home/mark/ New Projects Group/TTM -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read

Trransfering multifiles within one rsync session.

and server. Server is running on cygwin. Thanks! Mark J. de Jong ,.,.,.,...,.,,.,..,.,,.,..,.,..,.,.,,.,...,..,,... Senior Network Engineer - Secure Dog Hosting, Inc. P.703.256.2869 F.703.256.3810 C.571.212.0027 http://www.secdog.com -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org

RE: Rsync recursion

for your time! Mark J. de Jong ,.,.,.,...,.,,.,..,.,,.,..,.,..,.,.,,.,...,..,,... Senior Network Engineer - Secure Dog Hosting, Inc. P.703.256.2869 F.703.256.3810 C.571.212.0027 http://www.secdog.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf

Rsync recursion

. Does anyone have a suggestion as to how to perfom this task? Thanks for your time. Sincerely, Mark J. de Jong ,.,.,.,...,.,,.,..,.,,.,..,.,..,.,.,,.,...,..,,... Senior Network Engineer - Secure Dog Hosting, Inc. P.703.256.2869 F.703.256.3810 C.571.212.0027 http://www.secdog.com

Problems compiling on RH 5.2.

with #undef's and all of the symbols should include a prefix like rsync_ to avoid conflicts (including the structure tags). Thanks, Mark G. -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Rsync windows to linux is hanging

(Timeout) .. /snip Does anyone have any idea how to remedy this? Thanks for your time! Sincerely, Mark J. de Jong ,.,.,.,...,.,,.,..,.,,.,..,.,..,.,.,,.,...,..,,... Senior Network Engineer - Secure Dog Hosting, Inc. P.703.256.2869 F.703.256.3810 C.571.212.0027 http://www.secdog.com Mark

Re: strip setuid/setgid bits on backup (was Re: small security-related rsync extension)

never seen a file created with a newline in the filename (except, perhaps as a test). The newline in filename issue And in security exploits :-) Given a newline-based format, one *must* quote or deny newlines in filenames, not assume they're rare. (No obvious reason not to use URL-style

Re: Status Query - Please respond - Re: Patch to avoid 'Connection reset by peer' error for rsync on cygwin

Just because Linux lets you get away without it doesn't mean its a good idea. Except this has nothing to do with linux - this is unix behaviour that goes all the way back, it's part of the process model. It's part of what exiting *does*, so it *is* a bug in cygwin if it isn't doing the cleanup

Re: openssh 3.1 and rsync dont work

Bug seems to have been fixed in -current release ( SSH Bug 182 ) not sure when this will be available/official. Going to stick to 2.9.9 on the one machine until resolved. Mark Pitt SP Administrator IBM, Campus Winterthur 058-333-1542 Dave Dykstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 09.05.2002 16:34:57

Preserve TARGET perms, user and group would be nice

there is no option for this - the users are not defined on the sending system. I cant do it backwards due to firewall regulations. Mark Pitt SP Administrator IBM, Campus Winterthur 058-333-1542 Mark Pitt SP Administrator IBM, Campus Winterthur 058-333-1542 -- To unsubscribe or change

openssh 3.1 and rsync dont work

. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://www.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev [prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] Mark Pitt SP Administrator IBM, Campus Winterthur 058-333-1542 -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman

Re: [PATCH] --soften-links option (fwd from md@Linux.IT) Re: rsync and debian mirrors

May i suggest this be more clear, along the lines of Convert a hard link to a symbolic link if on the destination it would have to span filesystems Along with a Except that's overly precise -- for example, AFS doesn't permit hard links to span *directories* even if they're on the same

rsync under Mac OS X - advice/alternatives needed

+ volumes, permissions, and ownership information, and if not, whether there is an alternative that is supported (Sychronize Pro! X does not work properly in this regard). Cheers, Mark (I've only suscribed to this list last night, and this is my first post, so if this has already been answered

Re: metadata in dryrun mode

On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 07:28:07PM +0200, Mark Santcroos wrote: Please let me know and I will create the appropriate patch. Here is the patch I have created vs. cvs. I have tried to change as little structural things as possible to get the result. This basicly does what we want, please check

Re: metadata in dryrun mode

ps. dryrun.test is work in progress. On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 01:08:22PM +0200, Mark Santcroos wrote: On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 07:28:07PM +0200, Mark Santcroos wrote: Please let me know and I will create the appropriate patch. Here is the patch I have created vs. cvs. I have tried

Re: metadata in dryrun mode

On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 10:10:42AM +1000, Martin Pool wrote: Please try to write a test script for this while you're there, either as a standalone shell script or integrated with 'make check'. Hi Martin, Find it attached. Mark -- Mark Santcroos RIPE Network

Re: metadata in dryrun mode

/filename: group changed That way it can also be made more consistent between normal and dryrun mode. Please let me know so that I can take it into account into my patch. Mark -- Mark Santcroos RIPE Network Coordination Centre http://www.ripe.net/home/mark/ New

metadata in dryrun mode

the appropriate patch. Mark -- Mark Santcroos RIPE Network Coordination Centre http://www.ripe.net/home/mark/ New Projects Group/TTM -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart

Re: (fwd from uke@jeremy.org) thanks and patch

Wouldn't using detached signatures make more sense for this application? -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Re: relationship counselling for debian and rsync

It would be pretty cool if I could be automatically cc'd on Debian bug reports about rsync, if the BTS supports that. I'm pretty sure this got added in the last month or two... (type type type google google google) Ah yes, this posting to the debian QA list: | You can (un)subscribe to a

Re: Why would any REMOTE WILDCARD = No match ???

On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 07:02:01AM -0800, Derek Sivers wrote: But THIS immediately shoot back a No match error: rsync -avze ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/derek/*.pub ./ The wildcard expands locally. (your shell does that) Mark -- Mark Santcroos RIPE Network

HP/UX 11 bug

glob(3) on HP/UX 11 always strips a trailing slash from a pathname. This breaks the differing semantics of rsync directory host:/foo/bar rsync directory host:/foo/bar/ Here's a patch which, at least, doesn't seem to do any harm on Solaris or Linux and fixes the problem on HP. Cheers, Mark

Re: .plan to avoid unhappy users

with a patch Real Soon Now. Mark -- Mark Santcroos RIPE Network Coordination Centre http://www.ripe.net/home/mark/ New Projects Group/TTM

Re: using rsync with Mac OS X

and code is written, things will be harder to change ;-) Regards, Mark. Chris Garrigues wrote: A quick thought about implementation details: It would be nice if this were done in such a way that if I were to rsync from a non-OSX netatalk system onto an OSX system the .AppleDouble directories

Re: using rsync with Mac OS X

for suggestions and news of anyone else working on stuff that might dovetail with this. Also, I'm a bit concerned about the current behavior of reading the entire tree into memory, especially the effects that would have on large file sets. Any work being done on this front? Regards, Mark.

Re: move rsync development tree to BitKeeper?

GNU Subversions is apparently now self-hosting (and is actually free, instead of arguably free :-) If you're looking at perforce or bitkeeper, though, also look at Accurev 3.0 (which is free-for-free-software, in java, *fast* and has a better consistency model...)

Re: Using rsync 2.3.1, individual file size limitation...

send_files failed to open .../data1/intlmv.data/histimv.rec: Value too large for defined data type Is that Solaris 8? I ask not just because you should have mentioned this in the bug report (tsk tsk :-) but that I've seen that error and it *didn't* have anything to do with file size (or

rsyn on IBM mainframe using PS/390 Open MVS

Subject line is message - please respond directly as I am a non-member of this list. Motivation for question: W/o using SNA or a 3rd-party package such as Sterling Commerce's CONNECT:Direct desire to securely and timely move files between an IBM mainframe and a UNIX platform. Thank

RE: question on switches and their order

%. The CPU's simply cannot keep up with the LAN. The other switch you should use is -W. It deals with whole files and is significantly quicker. Cheers Mark -Original Message- From: Jeff Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 26 June 2001 08:15 To: Rsync List Subject: question

RE: question on switches and their order

rsync -avW --exclude=.snapshot /mail-data/ /mnt Cheers Mark -Original Message- From: Jeff Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 26 June 2001 09:19 To: RSync List (E-mail) Subject: Re: question on switches and their order So, if I understand you correctly, it should work fine

RE: librsync and network functions

? If so when is the likely release date? Cheers Mark CAUTION - This message may contain privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient

RE: rsync hangs in select on linux 2.4.5

and tools. Also the patch you list below (link) is different to one I saved of one of your earlier emails. Is the one below the latest version of the anti hang patch? Cheers Mark -Original Message- From: Wayne Davison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 14 June 2001 14:02 To: Jurgen

RE: rsync fails

changing the path. Personally I solved this by creating a script in a dir on my local path, say /usr/local/bin, called rsync that has a line in it similar to the one below: /opt/rsync/bin/rsync --rsync-path=/opt/rsync/bin/rsync $* Mark -Original Message- From: David Salisbury [mailto

RE: FW: Problem with large include files

How do I go about registering this bug with the include file. It would be good get this bug fixed as I would like to be able to back to 2.4.6 (or whatever) as it is faster and it has bandwidth limiting. Will let you know the results of the testing. Cheers Mark -Original Message

FW: Problem with large include files

correctly this would get around any latency problems. Cheers Mark CAUTION - This message may contain privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended

RE: Problem with large include files

method -which we really want to avoid. As a thought, have you or any of the other developers thought of getting rsync to operate over a number of streams or to use sliding windows to overcome latency effects? I look forward to your reply. Cheers Mark -Original Message- From: Dave Dykstra

Problem with large include files

be appreciated. Cheers Mark Mark Wilson Unix Consultant Midrange Services Team Corporate Information Technology Air New Zealand Phone +64-9 306-5480 x65-480 Fax +64-9 306-5457 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Sending large file across a 10Mbit link

to tune the transfer for greater speed but cannot find any information to help with this. Does anyone have any ideas. Cheers Mark Mark Wilson Unix Consultant Midrange Services Team Corporate Information Technology Air New Zealand Phone +64-9 306-5480 x65-480 Fax +64-9 306-5457 Email: [EMAIL

RE: Sending large file across a 10Mbit link

or one file? Cheers Mark CAUTION - This message may contain privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby n

Using rsync 2.4.6 to backup to spare disk problem

mounting /dev/sd1a on /usr/mnt and things did work as I intended. This could be disasterous for others that may of assumed the same I did. So if you have any suggestion or that this is a new or known bug, please let me know. --Mark Mark KeppingerInformation Services - Network Eng

rsync using processing power

of the one the files are coming from? Does the machine sending the files have to be the one that runs the rsync daemon, or can it run the client? Which uses more cpu - rsync as client or rsync in daemon mode? ...Mark

<    1   2