On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 00:36 -0200, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
> I use rsync -ii so that it logs *all* actions. Further, I don't use
> any delete option but use --force. This means that if there's a name
> collision rsync deletes files or directories. Here's an example:
>
> 0 0*deleting rwxrw
On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 12:25 -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 13:20 -0200, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
> > Got this in the log:
> >
> > rsync error: errors with program diagnostics (code 13) at log.c(340)
> > [generator=
> > 3.1.0dev]
>
> I
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 13:20 -0200, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
> Got this in the log:
>
> rsync error: errors with program diagnostics (code 13) at log.c(340)
> [generator=
> 3.1.0dev]
I got this too on a big local run backing up my system to an external
disk using rsnapshot.
/etc/rsnapshot-rsync -a
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 20:33 -0200, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
> Got this in the log:
>
> WARNING: path/file failed verification -- update discarded (will try again).
> rsync: read errors mapping "/path/file": No data available (61)
>
> The first line is rare but understandable. It's the second one th
On Sat, 2009-10-31 at 17:06 +0100, Boniforti Flavio wrote:
> I'm almost getting exhausted, thus I have to bother you people to get some
> help.
That's a non sequitur. Check
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#id382403 .
> I simply want to sync my "iTunes Music" folder from my Mac
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 12:16 -0400, JESSE CARROLL wrote:
> Forgive me if the answer is obvious but I've googled and searched the
> archives but I can't seem to find a good solution.
>
> Scenario on a Solaris system:
>
> ls -ld /foo
> drwxrwxrwx 2 user1other512 Oct 30 16:05 /foo
>
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 12:16 -0400, JESSE CARROLL wrote:
> Forgive me if the answer is obvious but I've googled and searched the
> archives but I can't seem to find a good solution.
>
> Scenario on a Solaris system:
>
> ls -ld /foo
> drwxrwxrwx 2 user1other512 Oct 30 16:05 /foo
>
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 21:11 +, List Reader wrote:
> While I haven't
> found the exact cause of the error, in my search I did find some
> suggestions that XFS is a better choice for backing up from HFS+, so I
> tried that and this error disappeared.
>
> This one remains though:
>
> rsync: r
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 10:11 -0400, Michael W. Cocke wrote:
> Quick question (I hope) I'm trying to use rsync 3.0.4 and opensuse 11.1
> to sync an entire /home tree. How to I get rsync to not skip files
> beginning with a . (period) ?
Rsync does not treat any filenames specially. There must be
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 23:46 +0100, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> On 28.10.2009 18:27, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 17:24 +0100, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> > > On 28.10.2009 10:35, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 10:01
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 18:55 +, Kay wrote:
> I'm running into a problem that I'm sure which part of the process
> fails. I use wget (OSX Leopard, wget 3.0.6 compiled from source) to
> backup my ~/Pictures directory to a linux server, also with wget 3.0.6
> (Debian). In persuit of being sur
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 17:24 +0100, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> On 28.10.2009 10:35, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 10:01 +0100, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> > > Otherwise parallel rsyncs completly kill any performance you had because
> > > n
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 10:01 +0100, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> On 28.10.2009 09:05, Satish Shukla wrote:
> > We have huge data to sync usually everyday and I wish rsync could guarantee
> > performance.
> >
> > I thought of spliting the directories and run parallel rsyncs on them. It
> > may
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 23:38 -0400, Tony wrote:
> When rsync 3.0.6 copies files with HFS+ File Compression, the new
> extended attribute decmpfs is not preserved, and the UF_COMPRESSED
> flag is not set on the destination and the destination file is not
> compressed.
>
> I examined the destin
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 19:31 -0400, Tony wrote:
> Are there any patches (or planned updates) to rsync v3.0.6 to handle
> the HFS+ File Compression that Apple introduced with Snow Leopard?
What kind of special treatment from rsync were you expecting? I read
http://arstechnica.com/apple/reviews/2
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 15:38 -0700, Jacob Weber wrote:
> Is it possible to call rsync and tell it to use a filter file if it
> exists, but otherwise continue without errors?
>
> If I pass "--filter=. .rsync-filter", it will fail if .rsync-filter
> doesn't exist.
>
> I know you can pass "--filt
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 12:14 +0200, Hans-Christian Jehg wrote:
> I have a rather curious problem. I rsync from a fileserver shared in via
> cifs. This connection sometimes fails (don't worry, that is not the
> question I have).
> I am not at all sure where it goes wrong, but in the end the result
On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 11:31 +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
> On Fri 23 Oct 2009, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 09:15 +0200, Riccardo Iaconelli wrote:
> > >
> > > [r...@popper linksys]# rsync -avz --hard-links test/ test2/
> > > sending increm
On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 09:15 +0200, Riccardo Iaconelli wrote:
> I'm encountering a bug with samba shares, rsync and hard links. I was trying
> to investigate why on my "linksys" samba share i wouldn't get any hard link
> transferred and rsyncs to it would take forever. To keep a long story short,
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 13:40 -0700, George Sanders wrote:
> I am tasked with pointing rsync transfers to valuable, live systems.
>
> The requirements include that this rsync job be run as root (rsync
> over ssh to the destination, as root) and that the --delete option be
> used.
> What would reall
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 17:50 +0800, Thomas Gutzler wrote:
> is there a way to exclude files from being backed up when running rsync -b?
No. --backup is one of many rsync options for which per-file settings
might be useful but are not currently supported.
--
Matt
--
Please use reply-all for mos
On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 12:13 -0700, Mike Connell wrote:
> > Interesting. If you're not using incremental recursion (the default in
> > rsync >= 3.0.0), I can see that the "du" would help by forcing the
> > destination I/O to overlap the file-list building in time. But with
> > incremental recursio
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 19:07 -0700, Mike Connell wrote:
> Today I tried the following:
>
> For all subsub directories
> a) Fork a "du -s subsubdirectory" on the destination
> subsubdirectory
> b) Run rsync on the subsubdirectory
> c) repeat untill done
>
> Seems to have improved the
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 17:40 -0300, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
> I'm getting "file has vanished" messages during a (recursive)
> --list-only. I find it strange because I'd expect rsync to access each
> file only once when just sending the receiver the file list.
There's still a small gap between the "r
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 03:51 -0700, Martin Scharrer wrote:
> I'm using rsync with -aP --remove-source-files to move files from one
> machine to another while watching the progress. I'm under the impression
> that rsync is deleting the transmitted source files on-the-fly, not at the
> very end, but w
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 20:54 +0400, rs...@xbit.ru wrote:
> Well, I must say that this must by bone by rsync.
> That's because I'm creating small automation system,
> part of it is rsync-based.
> Yes, I can write "rm -r dirB/dir2", but this will break consitency
> of the whole system and removes some
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 13:07 +0200, Thomas Ebert wrote:
> rsync has problems with symlinks. First some background information:
> I regularly back up my / and /home from my desktop PC and my netbook to
> my Synology DiskStation (500GB) using rsync 3.0.6 with this script:
> http://pastebin.com/m43d4
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 04:40 -0700, Martin Scharrer wrote:
> I agree with both above points. However, I would also vote for adding such
> an option to rsync.
> This should not be to difficult and would come in handy.
I'm not convinced of the need for a --target-dir option. Do you have an
example i
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 00:37 -0700, Wolfram Volpi wrote:
> Why does inserting an empty quote ("") into a rsync command cause the current
> directory to be backed up?
>
> Not sure if this is a UNIX-syntax question or rsync-syntax question.
>
> Code:
> #!/bin/sh
>
> echo "\nspace between quotes ha
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 03:17 +0400, rs...@xbit.ru wrote:
> Thank you, it works.
>
> But if I want to delete only certain files or dirs from remote side?
>
> example:
>
> $ tree dirA/
> dirA/
> |-- dir2
> | `-- file3
> |-- file1
> `-- file2
>
> $ tree dirB/
> dirB/
> |-- dir2
> | `-- file3
>
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 01:47 +0200, Roland Koebler wrote:
> as documented, if you use rsync with --copy-unsafe-links, and copy a
> directory with a symlink pointing outside of the copied tree, the
> referent of the symlink is copied.
>
> Now, assume that the directory contains a symlink, which poi
On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 12:47 -0400, Sanjeev Sharma wrote:
> Is this in rsync and I just can't find it, or if not, is there a way
> to fake this OR, third possibility, is anyone working to add it?
>
>
> For those who've never used this option - for the GNU cp & mv type
> commands they have the
> --
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 14:18 +, Andrew Gideon wrote:
> It assumes that --inplace
> actually does what it sounds like it does: it modifies only the disk
> pages of a file that have changed, as opposed to changing the entire file
> or creating a new file or some other thing which causes the fil
On Sat, 2009-10-03 at 09:41 -0500, Wayne Davison committed:
> Change the msg pipe to use a real multiplexed IO mode
> for the data that goes from the receiver to the generator.
Wayne,
Would you care to explain the impact of this change on the rsync I/O
design in terms that I might understand? It
On Sat, 2009-10-03 at 12:59 +0200, Roland Koebler wrote:
> the combination of --keep-dirlinks and --delete (--delete-during,
> --delete-delay) erroneously deletes symlinks to directories on
> the receiver.
> With --delete-before and --delete-after it works as expected.
>
> (rsync version 3.0.3 p
On Sun, 2009-10-04 at 00:29 +0400, rs...@xbit.ru wrote:
> I'm trying to create a filter file for rsync what saying which dirs to
> copy. For example i need only /lib and /var/lib dirs from remote server.
> I say:
> rsync -f ". /tmp/rsync_dirs" --dry-run --verbose "remote:/"
> "/local_dir/".
>
>
On Sat, 2009-10-03 at 22:06 -0700, Jeffrey Ellis wrote:
> Hm. I've tried all of the following:
>
> rsync -avve ssh --numeric-ids --delete --ignore-errors -R
> myu...@myisp.com:/usr/home/./myuser
> myu...@myisp.com:/usr/home/./myuser/mail_boxes/
> myu...@myisp.com:/usr/home/./myuser/public_html/ /V
On Sat, 2009-10-03 at 21:03 -0700, J. Ellis wrote:
> So let me see if I understand correctly. First, are the \ characters
> followed by a return, or are they all on a single line? In other words, is
> this entered in the terminal as one command, or does it need to be broken up
> somehow?
The \ is
On Sat, 2009-10-03 at 15:47 -0700, J. Ellis wrote:
> I have the following 3 commands which are supposed to run every night
> to back up my web server:
>
> rsync -avve ssh --numeric-ids --delete --ignore-errors
> myu...@myisp.com:/usr/home/myuser /Volumes/Downloads
> rsync -avve ssh --copy-links --
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 03:21 -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
> With rsync-3.0.6 on a Solaris 10/x86 system:
> $ mkdir /opt/s/c
> $ cd /opt/s/c
> $ gtar zxf rsync-3.0.6.tar.gz
> $ mkdir /opt/s/o
> $ rsync -aHv rsync-3.0.6 /opt/s/o
> $ mkdir /opt/s/o2
> $ cd /opt/s/o/rsync-3.0.6
> $ echo foo
On Sat, 2009-09-26 at 14:45 -0700, stefaan wrote:
> I'm running the following script for backup:
> SHORTHOST=`hostname | awk 'BEGIN { FS="." } { print $1 }'`
> cd $HOME || exit 1
> rsync --ignore-errors --max-size=50m -v --delete --delete-excluded
> --log-file=/tmp/backup.log --exclude-from=$HOME
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 12:46 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> We ran 2 mirror jobs using "rsync -av remote:/from /to"
> of appr. 700 GByte. Problem: On the second run about 10 or 15
> files were copied again, even though we are very sure that there
> was no service running which could have changed the
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 20:59 +0200, Enno Middelberg wrote:
> Here the two directories which couldn't be read have been deleted from
> the target directory (ie, the files contained in them were deleted,
> the directories did still exist, if I remember correctly). If I
> understand the man page correc
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 14:41 +1200, Allistar wrote:
> I am backing up a remove partition which is 38Gb onto a local partition
> which is 40Gb. Rsync is complaining that I have run out of disk space on
> the local partition, and I can tell that this would not happen if local
> files that are missing
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 14:41 +1200, Allistar wrote:
> I am backing up a remove partition which is 38Gb onto a local partition
> which is 40Gb. Rsync is complaining that I have run out of disk space on
> the local partition, and I can tell that this would not happen if local
> files that are missing
Lee,
Both of your proposals have been discussed before (see below), but
neither has been taken very far because they would both involve large
changes to rsync.
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 01:16 -0400, Lee Winter wrote:
> A simplistic approach would be to add a file-list option able to
> create-and-save
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 21:13 -0400, Lee Winter wrote:
> The purpose of this note is to inquire about your collective interest
> in optimizing rsync for certain uses, particularly atomic,
> unidirectional transfers with few or single writer and many, often
> very many, readers.
>
> After studying th
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 08:37 +0200, Fabian Cenedese wrote:
> Is there a way to get the status of a running rsync process?
AFAIK, rsync has never had such a feature. One thing you can do is
temporarily attach strace.
> I believe
> it has to be done by sending a signal, but I can't find it anymore.
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 10:30 -0300, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
> Matt McCutchen (m...@mattmccutchen.net) wrote on 13 September 2009 16:53:
> >On Sat, 2009-09-12 at 18:22 -0300, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
> >> Sanjay Acharya (svachary...@gmail.com) wrote on 11 September 2009 11:02:
&g
On Sun, 2009-09-13 at 21:02 -0400, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
> I am using rsync to back up across a VPN. Unfortunately, every so often the
> home office miscreants drop a big block of data into the backup and that
> particular backup cycle takes many hours. These same people also complain
> whe
On Sat, 2009-09-12 at 18:22 -0300, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
> Sanjay Acharya (svachary...@gmail.com) wrote on 11 September 2009 11:02:
> >How is rsync supposed to behave when I give the --delete-excluded?
>
> >From the manual for the --delete option:
>
>If the sending side detects any I/O erro
On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 08:42 -0500, Kevin Kramer wrote:
> is there anything special to do this from the daemon server. I've setup
> the /etc/rsyncd.conf with some filesystems and I would rather originate
> (control) my rsyncs from this server and not from the hosts that have
> the data I want. ie
On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 23:22 +0100, e-letter wrote:
> Scenario: file.txt on local machine, to be transferred to remote host.
> Remote host has rsync installed. Reading the manual I the examples
> describe scenarios where rsync is installed on the local machine. Is
> rsync suitable to use when instal
On Sat, 2009-09-05 at 14:25 +0200, Gilles-Alexandre wrote:
> I think IMHO that the description of the option "--checksum-seed"
> should be :
>
> "--checksum-seed=NUM spécifie le grain de sable pour la somme de
> contrôle"
The rsync project does not maintain a French manpage. Please report
t
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 10:25 -0700, Saibabu Devabhaktuni wrote:
> We currently use rsync to create an Oracle standby on a target box
> from an existing standby by copying all the datafiles while the source
> standby is in recovery status. We are occasionally running into
> datafile corruptions being
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 09:09 -0500, Mike Bombich wrote:
> Rsync shouldn't be converting UUID to uid/gid *for ACL entries*
> (because Mac OS X stores those ACEs with a reference to a UUID, not a
> uid/gid). For file ownership, etc., it should maintain its current
> behavior.
My point is that
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 23:09 -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> The
> incompatible code was expunged from CVS and was never imported into git.
Two further remarks:
- You didn't expunge
http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/src/rsync-2.6.8.tar.gz .
- You could have saved me some head-scratching by redacting
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 23:09 -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 12:32:45AM -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > Why were they dropped from the development history? There doesn't
> > appear to be a copyright issue: the file bears a BSD license.
>
> It u
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 14:11 +, Andrew Gideon wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:37:16 -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
>
> >> Anyone knows a trick that the server only answer if the client is use
> >> the compression?
> >
> > This is not currently possible.
>
> What if rsync-path is set to a little
Wayne,
Today, to investigate an issue on RHEL 5.2, I checked out rsync 2.6.8
from the rsync repository and attempted to build it. The build failed
because the tagged tree did not contain lib/addrinfo.h, which is
included by rsync.h. On further investigation, the 2007-10-24 snapshot
of the CVS re
On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 16:59 -0500, Mike Bombich wrote:
> Regardless, rsync shouldn't be converting uuid to uid/gid for Mac OS
> X, it's unnecessary.
This is really a question of whether Mac users expect users/groups to be
preserved by uid/gid or by uuid. Are you saying it makes more sense to
pr
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 22:12 +1200, Nathan Ward wrote:
> I'm trying to write an rsync 'proxy' of sorts. The plan is that my
> code runs on two machines (one 'client' and one 'server') and each
> piece of code executes a copy of rsync, and copies move in one
> direction (server -> client).
>
>
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 22:57 -0400, Mag Gam wrote:
> Is it possible to stream the content of a file using rsync to stdout
> instead of placing it into a file?
No. Consider rdiff, which lets you call each of the three steps of the
delta-transfer algorithm from a script. Or if you explain your use
On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 22:09 -0700, Linda A. Walsh wrote:
> FUSE runs on windows?
I took a quick look and found this "FUSE windows port":
http://fuse4win.4host.ru/
And Dokan, a user-mode filesystem layer for Windows which doesn't appear
to be directly compatible with FUSE (but I could be mistaken
On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 09:43 -0700, Linda A. Walsh wrote:
> Maybe rsync could support extattrs on non-supporting fs's with a
> ..xattr file stored
> at the same place as the :
> If a user used a switch to emulate 'xattrs', then on a fs that
> didn't support real .xattrs one
> could still ACL
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 16:58 +0200, Alessandro Toso wrote:
> I'm trying to backup a disk using rsync but I need to exclude some folder.
> I'm using rsync 3.0.4 under cygwin on a winxp machine.
> The script that I use is:
>
> # #
> S
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 07:24 -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 03:10:20PM -0400, Sharad K wrote:
> > Everything works fine except the --delete flag.
>
> Does rsync output a warning about an I/O error, saying it is disabling
> deletes? You can use --force if you're sure you want
On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 21:37 +0530, Jignesh Shah wrote:
> I have a situation where I want to delete some of my excluded patterns
> but still want to preserve some other. For example consider below
> source and destination directory hierarchy.
>
> SourceDest
> --
On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 23:24 +0200, Tim Edwards wrote:
> Matt McCutchen schrieb:
> >
> > No, rsync will only do that if if you have it
> > "synchronize" /USBstick/backups/dir , i.e., specify a source directory
> > that maps to it. Just copying several dirs _int
Paul,
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 15:10 +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
> On Thu 16 Jul 2009, vven...@gmail.com wrote:
> > /folder1/folder2/users/01234002360/my/FSG2_PULL#79GA91205KAE ->
> > /folder1/folder2/rep/01234018329/FSG2_PULL.txt#79GA91205KAE
> Once two files are hard-linked, there is
> no diffe
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 01:48 -0300, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
> What's the purpose of --partial-dir then? I thought it was leaving the
> partial transfer as path/partial/filename instead of
> path/.filename.random. That's what it tried to do but this isn't fine
> if it needs another move. If rsync is
On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 17:01 -0300, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
> Here's a running instance caught by ps (lines broken for readibility):
>
> rsync --perms --times --timeout=3600 --stats --no-motd -hh --force
> --hard-links -ii --links --partial-dir=.~tmp~ --recursive --exclude
> --out-format= --delete-
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 17:31 -0300, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
> From a quick look at generator.c it seems partial-dir applies only to
> regular files (partialptr = NULL in line 1767), which means that
> some/path/newdir/newfile is created at
> some/path/newdir//newfile.
Correct.
> It also appears tha
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 13:01 +0200, Tim Edwards wrote:
> I have a script transferring some backup files onto a USB stick, which
> has limited space. I use rsync 3.0.5 with the following command:
> rsync -av --delete-before /local/backups/dir/backup1_todaysdate
> /local/backups/dir/backup2_todaysdat
On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 14:59 -0400, alexus wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Wayne Davison wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 09:42:08PM -0400, alexus wrote:
> >> I dont know if that helpful, but all I'm saying is fileflags.diff
> >> isn't working for rsync-3.0.6, but it works for rsync-3.0.
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 16:21 +0100, Ed W wrote:
> I love rsync, but I recently discovered unison and for some tasks it
> works better. In particular it is designed to track changes on both
> sides and can spot the difference between something deleted and not
> yet copied. Perhaps give it a whirl w
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 09:24 +0800, Low, Alex wrote:
> We do have a situation now where we need rsync to transfer the files
> once only from the source directory. Please let me briefly explain
>
> using a simple generic exmple:
>
> 1. At t0, we transfer f0 location A to location B
>
> 2. At t1,
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 11:01 +0530, Jignesh Shah wrote:
> You are correct Carlos but it wasn't happening with rsync-2.6 and
> started happening with rsync-3.0.6. Do you have any idea on this?
The "could not make way" error message is new in rsync 3.0.0 (see
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?i
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 12:22 +0200, Jan Alphenaar wrote:
> Apparently there is a difference in pushing and pulling files with rsync.
> When I push my files to the server with this command, I see one rsync
> process on my WinXP machine, just as expected
> But when I pull my files from the server to
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 07:10 +0800, Daniel.Li wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 14:34 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > > And one more thing here:
> > > If you are going to prepare this batch file, it seems there will be
> > double the workload of network, see belo
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 17:08 +0800, Daniel.Li wrote:
> Dear Wayne,
> Excellent, that's really what I have expected!
>
> Is it stable now? Cause I have found that this feature seems to be
> unstable before ver 3.0.6.
>
> - Fixed a --read-batch hang when rsync is reading a batch file that was
>
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 10:34 +0200, Petr Uzel wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 09:04:59PM -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > Wayne,
> >
> > How can I access the rsync maintained patches repository with the git
> > tools?
> See
> http://www.mail-archive.com/rsync@l
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 10:46 +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
> On Thu 28 May 2009, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> >
> > $ firefox http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=rsync.git;a=summary
>
> I guess you left out the quotes you must have used here,
> as otherwise a=summary won't be includ
Wayne,
How can I access the rsync maintained patches repository with the git
tools? These work:
$ firefox http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=rsync.git;a=summary
$ git clone git://git.samba.org/rsync.git
$ firefox http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=rsync.git/patches.git;a=summary
So I thought this might work, b
On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 06:28 +0200, Heinrich Götzger wrote:
> I'm using rsnapshot 1.3.1 on a Synology Diskstation ds 107+.
> # uname -a
> Linux ds107 2.6.15 #832 Sat Mar 7 00:44:45 CST 2009 armv5tejl GNU/Linux
>
> rsnpahot uses rsync, on my box there is:
>
> # rsync --version
> rsync version 3.0.
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 02:28 -0700, tammy wrote:
> I have 3 load balancing servers. Each user may login to different servers to
> upload their data, lets say, a company logo.
> That's why i tried to use rsync to synchronize the uploaded logo and some
> other necessary modules. This mean, each server
the update without causing
the redo or (if already redoing) exit code 23 that sending a bad
checksum normally would.
--
Matt
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Matt McCutchen
wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 15:49 +0530, Jignesh Shah wrote:
> > > Hi, I am wondering how r
On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 14:53 -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 06:32:40PM +0200, Christian Hecht wrote:
> > Such a tool i plan to write for Mac OS X. The first time it should
> > store checksums and mod times for all files to verify.
>
> There are various patches in the "patches
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 21:58 +, Frank Harmann wrote:
> i am new to rsync and i want to use rsync to emulate rdiff behaviour
> (because i can't install rdiff on the system).
> What i would like rsync to do is to generate a diff file (like with
> rsync --write-batch) but WITHOUT changing the dest
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 10:41 -0400, Larry Irwin wrote:
> So, I have a file like rsync.exclude that contains something like:
>
> /media/cdrom*/*
> /media/floppy*/*
> /tmp/*
> /u/tmp/*
> /v/tmp/*
> /var/spool/lpd/*/df*
> /var/spool/lpd/*/hf*
>
> And then in the script to kick off the rsync process:
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 10:09 +0800, Daniel.Li wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 09:58 +0800, Daniel.Li wrote:
> > What if a video editor?
> >
> > Lots of work with video files, which is very large, about 500MB per
> > file. Editor only delete or rearrange frames in that file.
> >
> > And then it will
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 15:49 +0530, Jignesh Shah wrote:
> Hi, I am wondering how rsync-3.0.6 react if it encounters ESTALE error
> while synching? If I remember correctly then the rsync-2.6.0 skipping
> that file/dir in case of ESTALE error.
If rsync encounters any kind of error reading a source fi
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 16:16 -0300, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
> The manual says that without --recursive directories are (noisily)
> skiped. However with --relative intermediate directories are created.
> So what happens if you give only -R? Is -d the default? And what
> happens when you give -R --no-
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 12:49 +0530, Jignesh Shah wrote:
> O... If I am not wrong then this behavior is same from older
> rsync2.6.0 to latest rsync3.0.6.
That's correct.
--
Matt
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Matt McCutchen
wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 12:19
ions (-tpog, etc.), while without --implied-dirs,
rsync will not set their attributes.
--
Matt
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Matt McCutchen
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 10:58 +0530, Jignesh Shah wrote:
> > I was in under impression that rsync
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 10:58 +0530, Jignesh Shah wrote:
> I was in under impression that rsync 3.0.5/3.0.6 creates all the
> missing directories in the path but I think I am wrong. Could any one
> tell me is it possible to create all missing dirs in path at
> destination side if not exists. Currentl
On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 15:59 +0300, Amir Rapson wrote:
> Running rsync with --whole-file yields poorer performance results than
> a simple "cp".
> Looking at the code - it looks like "copy_file" isn't really called
> when I add the --whole-file flag. The regular "receive_data" is doing
> the copy.
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 17:18 +0200, Dieter Stüken wrote:
> I want to use rsync in a may be unusual way:
>
> I have a source tree containing lots of symbolic links and I use
> the option "--copy-links" to get the physical files (the referents of
> the symlinks)
> on the target host.
>
> As the h
On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 11:41 -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 03:46:38PM -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > The only thing I see different between rsync 2.6.7 and 3.0.5 is
> > that 3.0.5 puts thousand separators in the numbers:
>
> That's a 3.1.0dev f
On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 01:08 +0530, Jignesh Shah wrote:
> I think I got it. The line in rsync 2.6.7 "wrote 130 bytes read 464
> bytes 108.00 bytes/sec" is changed to "2009/05/05 00:17:45 [26050]
> sent 130 bytes received 464 bytes 108.00 bytes/sec" in rsync 3.0.5.
>
> Please let me know if I am
201 - 300 of 1717 matches
Mail list logo
