[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I get the following error running rsync 2.5.2 on AIX 4.3 in combination
> with SSH Secure Shell 2.3.0.
>
> > rsync -e ssh myuserid@localhost:/tmp
> myuserid's password:
> /bin/ksh: rsync: not found.
> unexpected EOF in read_timeout
>
> ...
> Note: my PATH is set to in
Thomas Quinot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
> What seems to occur on the server is that socketpair(3)
> (not pipe(2)) is called, which needs to open /dev/ticotsord.
> Since I do not have a /dev in the chroot directory,
> this call fails.
Why not just make a /dev in the chroot and put only tioc
Antonio José Morán <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have some troubles using rsync-2.5.2.
> ...
I don't know if this is one of the known problems with 2.5.2,
but there are some serious problems with 2.5.2, I'd advise
dumping it immediately and getting the most recent version,
or wait
Nitin Agarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Mr. Rusty,
> We have not defined the timeout parameter in the configuration file. That means no
>timeout (by
> default). So, that cant be the solution.
> Further, I checked on the net (in the mailing lists), many are complaining the same
>error, bu
Nitin Agarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Mr. Rusty,
> Thanks for the reply. The problem was sorted out by changing the uid option in
> rsyncd.conf file to root.
> We are facing two more problem now
> 1) while transferring the files, sometimes the transfer breaks in between and gives
> u
Harry Putnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What is the necessary syntax to exclude a file named #notes# from an
> action?
>
> I've tried these without success:
>
> #*
> "#*"
> #notes#
> "#notes#"
> \#notes\#
>
there's an old message where Dave said:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 05:17:32PM +0100,
Dave Dykstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 11:55:24AM -0500, Philip Mak wrote:
> > Can I make rsync suppress this sort of error
> > message, so that these messages don't show up in my mailbox?
>
> No, you'll have to post-process the output of rsync.
Um, lets see - so
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I keep getting these smarmy sermons from somebody's mail account. I
> include my response to it below, though from its message, it probably
> won't be read.
Yikes.
Chill, everyone! I hate html email as much as the next person,
(maybe more so ;-) But I just lived t
amiel ong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I already installed rsync on both my server(running
> FREEBSD 4.4) and
> win98 macine. My LAN don't connect to the internet so
> it is quite secure, is it possible if I don't use
> OpenSSH?
>
> when I run "rsync 172.22.0.104::", I get this
> message:
>
"Thomas Lambert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have about 12 NT servers that I want to backup 1 directory to my Linux
> Server. The problem I am having is trying to get it not to ask for the
> user's password. I am trying to use ssh. I just installed the latest
> cygwin on my NT server (1.3.4)
(Courtesy copy sent directly to Ben)
Eric Whiting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ben Ricker wrote:
> >
> > I am using Rsync between a Redhat Linux box and an AIX RS600. We have
> > a about 30gb of database we need to sync to a backup server. Sounds
> > good, right? The problem is that Rsync is so
e
> > shell script that I have the problem.
Are they being run under different shells? (see above)
> ... I've only seen it when doing an exec of a program
> when the size of the argument list plus the size of the environment are
> larger than a system-defined limit.
(Now
c helper app, which may or may not be useful
for what you want to do. the others (especially mirrordir and drbd)
look more like what you want, maybe.
Good luck!
rc
Rusty Carruth Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (480) 345-3621 SnailMail: Schlumberger ATE
FAX:
come up with a workaround.... I've wondered
about using a local (personal) sshd running on non-priv port that
has been enabled to do forwarding - but fortunately all my servers
I use allow forwarding.
Beyond that I'm stuck (clue challenged! :-)
> any other ideas? - again - thanks in advance
I don't suppose you (Martin) could set it up locally and see what happens
on the server side logs? If I had any time I'd try it here for you,
but I'd probably break our current rsync job ;-)
rc
Rusty Carruth Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (480) 345-3621 SnailMail: Schlumberger ATE
FAX: (480) 345-8793 7855 S. River Parkway, Suite 116
Ham: N7IKQ @ 146.82+,pl 162.2 Tempe, AZ 85284-1825
ICBM: 33 20' 44"N 111 53' 47"W
not that this is a democracy
or anything, but hey, it makes me feel good ;-)
rc
Rusty Carruth Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (480) 345-3621 SnailMail: Schlumberger ATE
FAX: (480) 345-8793 7855 S. River Parkway, Suite 116
Ham: N7IKQ @ 146.82+,pl 162.2 Tempe, AZ 85284-1825
ICBM: 33 20' 44"N 111 53' 47"W
"OMeara, Randy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> ...
> Research and experimentation indicates that the cause of this symptom is the
> timing and manner in which the sender's socket is closed. ...
>
> I believe a proper fix would require a modification of the rsync protocol
Actually, a
ds
that a text diff of 2 binary files doesn't make sense).
Steve
Rusty Carruth Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (480) 345-3621 SnailMail: Schlumberger ATE
FAX: (480) 345-8793 7855 S. River Parkway, Suite 116
Ham: N7IKQ @ 146.82+,pl 162.2
using that option, just like using find
(wow, what a surprise ;-)
Then, of course, someone will come along with a program that reads filenames from
a pipe and does the backup, and they'll want --backup-pipe-process=/path/to/executable
or --backup-pipe=/path/to/pipe or --backup-daem
rints them... (Gag,
implementing printf manually again!) If it seems like a good idea (for pretty
small values of good, I think!) I'd be happy to come up with something (that
actually compiles ;-) if there's no huge hurry for it
(The above stuff is such a hack I kinda hate to admit I
non-inetd will do NOTHING unless
you also say --daemon)
Is this (really minor) patch worth sending along to the list?
Does anyone else want such a thing?
Can someone come up with a better option string than 'force-non-inetd'???
Thanks!
rc
Rusty Carruth Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED
20 matches
Mail list logo
