[Bug 10322] Slow Performance over Network rsync

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10322 --- Comment #12 from Linda Walsh 2013-12-25 14:18:46 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > i found that _my_ performance differences between 3.0.8 and 3.0.9 are being > caused by this commit: > > https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync.git;a=commitdiff;h=4c0

[Bug 10322] Slow Performance over Network rsync

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10322 --- Comment #11 from Linda Walsh 2013-12-24 21:47:56 UTC --- samba-b...@samba.org wrote: > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10322 > > --- Comment #5 from roland 2013-12-24 01:28:45 UTC --- > i installed 64 bit cygwin on my windows8 syste

[Bug 10322] Slow Performance over Network rsync

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10322 --- Comment #10 from Linda Walsh 2013-12-24 21:43:04 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Perhaps 3.0.8 was compiled with an older cygwin that does not obey this > per-process limit? --- If it is per/process, it isn't in cygwin, since the 400MB/s ra

[Bug 10322] Slow Performance over Network rsync

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10322 --- Comment #9 from Linda Walsh 2013-12-24 21:42:17 UTC --- (I hate 1-way mail gateways) (In reply to comment #2) > 45mb/s with cygwin? > are you really sure? > > afaik, rsync via cygwin always is dead slow, especially in "local mode", which > you

[Bug 10322] Slow Performance over Network rsync

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10322 --- Comment #8 from roland 2013-12-24 13:26:50 UTC --- now things getting really crazy. if i _remove_ the mentioned commit from rsync 3.1.0, it gives a speedup from ~30mb/s to about 60 mb/s !!! so with the transition from 3.0.8 to 3.0.9 avoiding

[Bug 10322] Slow Performance over Network rsync

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10322 --- Comment #7 from roland 2013-12-24 12:50:01 UTC --- i found that _my_ performance differences between 3.0.8 and 3.0.9 are being caused by this commit: https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync.git;a=commitdiff;h=4c0055ecbb51f7fbc878229ec615f93e1adc506f w

[Bug 10322] Slow Performance over Network rsync

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10322 --- Comment #6 from roland 2013-12-24 11:20:56 UTC --- latest rsync git is also fast, rsync 3.0.7 is also slow. so, there must be some critical change between 3.0.8 and 3.0.9 which leds to differences in speed, but apparently it "depends" how this

[Bug 10322] Slow Performance over Network rsync

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10322 --- Comment #5 from roland 2013-12-24 01:28:45 UTC --- i installed 64 bit cygwin on my windows8 system and compared the cygwin builtin rsync 3.0.9 to self compiled rsync 3.1.0 and 3.0.8. surprisingly, both 3.0.9 and 3.1.0 are fast (~30mb/s) BUT(!)

[Bug 10322] Slow Performance over Network rsync

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10322 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #4 from Wayne Davison

[Bug 10024] rsync cannot delete remote file, yet exit value is 0.

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10024 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 10209] rsync in dry run reports it will create a backup dir even though it already exists

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10209 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 10163] rsync -X is ineffective when setting owner/group

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10163 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 10332] sync won't talk to rsync-3.1.0

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10332 --- Comment #2 from m...@gromco.com 2013-12-23 17:31:26 UTC --- Correct, the rsync-3.1.0-2.fc21.src.rpm running on the server unexpectedly closed connection in the middle of a transfer. And client rsync reported this. I will try look how to get serv

[Bug 10332] sync won't talk to rsync-3.1.0

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10332 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Wayne Davison

[Bug 10334] rsync doesn't log hardlink-copies using --link-dest

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10334 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 10336] Time in file listing with --list-only option is inconsistent whether dst is given or not

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10336 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 10322] Slow Performance over Network rsync

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10322 --- Comment #3 from roland 2013-12-19 20:33:05 UTC --- does cygwin have strace ? i would do two identical transfers, one with rsync 3.0.8 and one with 3.0.9 being started under control of strace you may get a clue if there is a difference. strac

[Bug 10334] rsync doesn't log hardlink-copies using --link-dest

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10334 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Korb 2013-12-19 17:56:05 UTC --- Specify --itemize-changes twice. This works for -v as well but it works better on --itemize-changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You

[Bug 10338] Start deletion from the top of the hierarchy

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10338 --- Comment #2 from Ben RUBSON 2013-12-19 15:50:22 UTC --- Paul, yes you're right, files have to be deleted on by one, but perhaps Rsync overhead could be skipped. I made some tests, I created a directory with 300k files in it. I deleted it with

[Bug 10338] Start deletion from the top of the hierarchy

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10338 --- Comment #1 from Paul Slootman 2013-12-19 15:33:15 UTC --- The files have to be deleted one by one anyway, I'm not sure how much this could be improved. Have you compared how long a simple rm -r $TOPDIR takes, compared to rsync? Make sure to flu

[Bug 10338] New: Start deletion from the top of the hierarchy

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10338 Summary: Start deletion from the top of the hierarchy Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5

[Bug 10312] Rsync times out during deletion on big folders

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10312 --- Comment #1 from Ben RUBSON 2013-12-19 13:54:52 UTC --- Hello, I encounter same issue, I have sometimes a huge amount of files to delete. Rsync daemon can take a lot of time to delete them, leading Rsync client into a timeout... Another simil

[Bug 10336] New: Time in file listing with --list-only option is inconsistent whether dst is given or not

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10336 Summary: Time in file listing with --list-only option is inconsistent whether dst is given or not Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status:

[Bug 10334] rsync doesn't log hardlink-copies using --link-dest

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10334 --- Comment #2 from Andreas 2013-12-19 11:34:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Have you tried -i option? (itemize-changes) Thanks for your quick response. Yes, I did, but it makes no difference --- rsync -ahiv --link-dest=$link $source $

[Bug 10334] rsync doesn't log hardlink-copies using --link-dest

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10334 --- Comment #1 from Paul Slootman 2013-12-19 11:21:42 UTC --- Have you tried -i option? (itemize-changes) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA

[Bug 10334] New: rsync doesn't log hardlink-copies using --link-dest

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10334 Summary: rsync doesn't log hardlink-copies using --link-dest Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

[Bug 7865] files or dirs with more than 16 ACLs are not rsynced correctly

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7865 --- Comment #6 from glorang 2013-12-18 14:45:01 UTC --- We're facing the same issue. Ran a gdb against latest rsync 3.1.0. Hopefully this helps, I'm not a C guru though. # getacl Save # file: Save # owner: 200 # group: 200 user::rwx user:201:rwx us

[Bug 10322] Slow Performance over Network rsync

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10322 --- Comment #2 from Jörg Grube 2013-12-17 19:13:04 UTC --- It is true. i realize a Speed of 20-25 mb/s with rsync Version 3.0.8. Any newer Version transfers only 2-5 mb/s. i run my tests on several Computers and as long as i stay with version 3.0.8

[Bug 10332] New: sync won't talk to rsync-3.1.0

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10332 Summary: sync won't talk to rsync-3.1.0 Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core

[Bug 10325] New: Links to files marked schg (system immutable) fail

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10325 Summary: Links to files marked schg (system immutable) fail Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: x64 OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug 10322] Slow Performance over Network rsync

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10322 --- Comment #1 from roland 2013-12-14 13:24:46 UTC --- >rsync 3.0.8 runs with 45 mb/sec 45mb/s with cygwin? are you really sure? afaik, rsync via cygwin always is dead slow, especially in "local mode", which you are using. (as you read from a net

[Bug 10322] New: Slow Performance over Network rsync

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10322 Summary: Slow Performance over Network rsync Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component:

[Bug 10312] New: Rsync times out during deletion on big folders

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10312 Summary: Rsync times out during deletion on big folders Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

[Bug 10304] safe_read failed to read 1 bytes

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10304 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Comment #2 from Wayne Davison

[Bug 9783] please don't use client-server model for local copies

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9783 --- Comment #5 from m8r-28l5...@mailinator.com 2013-12-02 23:01:59 UTC --- I can only chime in on this bug. I'm using rsync on my ReasyNAS 102, which as an ARM core (Marvell Armada 370). Unfortunately, rsync is _very_ slow locally. The constant check

[Bug 10290] Regression since 3.0.9: send_xattr_request: Assertion `f_out >= 0' failed

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10290 --- Comment #2 from Moritz Bunkus 2013-12-02 13:47:18 UTC --- I can confirm that the error does indeed not occur with --protocol=30. Anything else I can test for you? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email -

[Bug 10304] safe_read failed to read 1 bytes

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10304 --- Comment #1 from Pol Hallen 2013-12-02 12:26:33 UTC --- On rsync 3.0.9.4 (debian 7) no problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA cont

[Bug 10304] New: safe_read failed to read 1 bytes

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10304 Summary: safe_read failed to read 1 bytes Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: x86 OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component

[Bug 10163] rsync -X is ineffective when setting owner/group

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10163 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #9236|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 10163] rsync -X is ineffective when setting owner/group

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10163 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added CC||caowastel...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from

[Bug 10295] do_lchown() after set_xattr() causes xattrs to be dropped.

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10295 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 10295] do_lchown() after set_xattr() causes xattrs to be dropped.

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10295 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Wayne Davison

[Bug 10295] do_lchown() after set_xattr() causes xattrs to be dropped.

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10295 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #9489|0 |1 is patch|

[Bug 10182] Deleted file not shown in logfile (--log-file) unless out-format option is specified

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10182 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 10233] rsync is spending a lot of time lstat64()'ing --exclude'd files

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10233 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Severity|normal

[Bug 10295] New: do_lchown() after set_xattr() causes xattrs to be dropped on Linux 3.10.20.

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10295 Summary: do_lchown() after set_xattr() causes xattrs to be dropped on Linux 3.10.20. Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW

[Bug 10290] Regression since 3.0.9: send_xattr_request: Assertion `f_out >= 0' failed

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10290 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Wayne Davison

[Bug 10272] resource fork handling is broken in 3.1.0

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10272 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 10238] --dry-run does not change directory, causes --link-dest failure on symlinks

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10238 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 10290] New: Regression since 3.0.9: send_xattr_request: Assertion `f_out >= 0' failed

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10290 Summary: Regression since 3.0.9: send_xattr_request: Assertion `f_out >= 0' failed Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW

[Bug 1890] TLS for rsync protocol

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1890 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 1890] TLS for rsync protocol

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1890 --- Comment #12 from roland 2013-11-22 22:22:40 UTC --- based on http://dozzie.jarowit.net/trac/wiki/RsyncSSL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the

[Bug 1890] TLS for rsync protocol

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1890 --- Comment #11 from roland 2013-11-22 22:21:30 UTC --- from the rsync 3.1.0 release notes : Rsync now comes packaged with an rsync-ssl helper script that can be used to contact a remote rsync daemon using a piped-stunnel command. It a

[Bug 10272] resource fork handling is broken in 3.1.0

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10272 --- Comment #1 from Mike Bombich 2013-11-17 18:11:50 UTC --- resource fork data needs to be chunked in sys_lgetxattr(). The changes to accommodate this are already in the hfs-compression patch, though it's probably a good idea to get the lib/sysxat

[Bug 8512] rsync is slower than cp -- Reduce overhead to cp for transfer of large files

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8512 --- Comment #4 from John Wiegley 2013-11-17 09:02:51 UTC --- Let me add my voice to the mix here. I'm copying a 1GB VOB file from an Ubuntu ZFS server running Samba 4.1.1, to my Mac OS X 10.9 box. iperf reports 112 MB/s (should be my theoretical

[Bug 10272] New: resource fork handling is broken in 3.1.0

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10272 Summary: resource fork handling is broken in 3.1.0 Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

[Bug 10263] New: Extend Behaviour of the --fuzzy Parameter

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10263 Summary: Extend Behaviour of the --fuzzy Parameter Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5

[Bug 10037] do_mknod fails to create socket file

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10037 --- Comment #2 from Simon Klinkert 2013-11-05 11:20:52 UTC --- Returning ENAMETOOLONG is somehow clean, but on the other hand not really helpful for the user. I think it might be better to try to handle this error with chdir() and a shorter path b

[Bug 10244] New: link-by-hash patch: speed enhancement by hash calculation on source side

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10244 Summary: link-by-hash patch: speed enhancement by hash calculation on source side Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Se

[Bug 10238] New: --dry-run does not change directory, causes --link-dest failure on symlinks

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10238 Summary: --dry-run does not change directory, causes --link-dest failure on symlinks Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW

[Bug 10233] rsync is spending a lot of time lstat64()'ing --exclude'd files

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10233 --- Comment #1 from Darxus 2013-10-29 15:57:28 UTC --- A useful workaround would be something like: find / | grep -v 'gz$' > filelist.txt rsync -Pva --files-from=filelist.txt / Also, don't rsync /proc/kcore :/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bug

[Bug 10233] New: rsync is spending a lot of time lstat64()'ing --exclude'd files

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10233 Summary: rsync is spending a lot of time lstat64()'ing --exclude'd files Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: n

[Bug 10220] symlinks are not counted as files in --stats

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10220 --- Comment #4 from Ivan Dimitrov 2013-10-28 20:26:44 UTC --- THANK YOU. Somehow I've omitted this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA cont

[Bug 10220] symlinks are not counted as files in --stats

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10220 --- Comment #3 from Wayne Davison 2013-10-28 17:32:26 UTC --- As my paste shows, they are counted in the created files. They aren't counted in the updated regular files since they aren't regular files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samb

[Bug 10220] symlinks are not counted as files in --stats

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10220 --- Comment #2 from Ivan Dimitrov 2013-10-28 08:26:34 UTC --- Yes, I updated since then, but symlinks are not counted anywhere. Thus making a system that rely on `--dry-run --stats -v |grep transferred` would fail if only symlinks are changed. --

[Bug 10220] symlinks are not counted as files in --stats

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10220 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 10031] rsync daemon should do forward lookups of allowed hostnames

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10031 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 10037] do_mknod fails to create socket file

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10037 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 10179] massive test failure on OSX 10.8.5 under Homebrew

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10179 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 10211] Log lines sent to files should not human-readable-ize numbers, ever

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10211 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 10226] fatal_unsafe_io_error and the version it reports

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10226 --- Comment #2 from Wayne Davison 2013-10-27 16:58:43 UTC --- I should mention that the issue is that the client is not letting the server side know (via -Ef flag) that it has the fixed delete logic available (for older protocols). I should have m

[Bug 10226] fatal_unsafe_io_error and the version it reports

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10226 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 10182] Deleted file not shown in logfile (--log-file) unless out-format option is specified

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10182 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Wayne Davison

[Bug 10092] Hang when remote dest's disk is full

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10092 --- Comment #4 from Volker Kuhlmann 2013-10-25 05:53:22 UTC --- I gave the relevant parts of the command only, the full version spans 3 lines but the --exclude options and actual paths are hardly relevant. Read that as rhost:/whateverdir/ if you p

[Bug 10092] Hang when remote dest's disk is full

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10092 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Korb 2013-10-25 05:26:55 UTC --- What is this rhost:/... syntax? Are you actually trying to make a directory named "..."? If not then I think you have a typo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs

[Bug 10092] Hang when remote dest's disk is full

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10092 Volker Kuhlmann changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

[Bug 10226] New: fatal_unsafe_io_error and the version it reports

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10226 Summary: fatal_unsafe_io_error and the version it reports Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

[Bug 10220] New: symlinks are not counted as files in --stats

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10220 Summary: symlinks are not counted as files in --stats Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5

[Bug 10219] New: Warn if list files more than once

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10219 Summary: Warn if list files more than once Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Compone

[Bug 10211] New: Log lines sent to files should not human-readable-ize numbers, ever

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10211 Summary: Log lines sent to files should not human-readable-ize numbers, ever Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severit

[Bug 10209] New: rsync in dry run reports it will create a backup dir even though it already exists

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10209 Summary: rsync in dry run reports it will create a backup dir even though it already exists Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: N

[Bug 7249] Add an option to use O_NOATIME

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249 Martin von Gagern changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #9278||review? Flags|

[Bug 10182] Deleted file not shown in logfile (--log-file) unless out-format option is specified

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10182 --- Comment #1 from Emanuele 'Lele' Calo' - End Point Corp. 2013-10-08 17:45:31 UTC --- *bump* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact f

[Bug 8817] Custom format for --list-only

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8817 --- Comment #1 from Carlos Carvalho 2013-10-07 14:50:51 UTC --- That'd be EXTREMELY useful here... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contac

[Bug 10181] --stats bug

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10181 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 10182] New: Deleted file not shown in logfile (--log-file) unless out-format option is specified

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10182 Summary: Deleted file not shown in logfile (--log-file) unless out-format option is specified Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NE

[Bug 10181] New: --stats bug

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10181 Summary: --stats bug Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo

[Bug 10179] massive test failure on OSX 10.8.5 under Homebrew

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10179 --- Comment #1 from chd...@gmail.com 2013-10-03 02:54:49 UTC --- I apologize: it turns out that it IS homebrew's fault, and they just fixed it. The reason it always worked before is because they used to not have temp dirs that start with hyphens; t

[Bug 10179] New: massive test failure on OSX 10.8.5 under Homebrew

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10179 Summary: massive test failure on OSX 10.8.5 under Homebrew Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

[Bug 9041] Feature request: Better handling of btrfs based sources

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9041 Kevin Korb changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 10170] rsync should support reflink similar to cp --reflink

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10170 --- Comment #1 from Kevin Korb 2013-09-27 00:31:00 UTC --- *** Bug 9041 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Bug 10170] New: rsync should support reflink similar to cp --reflink

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10170 Summary: rsync should support reflink similar to cp --reflink Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

[Bug 9693] New --time-format option

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9693 --- Comment #1 from mlus...@redhat.com 2013-09-23 12:33:43 UTC --- Created attachment 9237 --> https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=9237 Patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiv

[Bug 10163] New: rsync -X is ineffective when setting owner/group

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10163 Summary: rsync -X is ineffective when setting owner/group Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

[Bug 7129] rsync 3.0.7 - unlink failed (21) - unable to delete directory

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7129 --- Comment #9 from basti 2013-09-19 10:05:33 UTC --- Just for Info I have hit this bug on debian 7.1, when creating a backup of my rsnapshot backup. I need to preserve hard links for this. """ % rsync --version rsync version 3.0.9 protocol vers

[Bug 10074] rsync reorders --from-files alphabetically

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10074 --- Comment #5 from Christian Campbell 2013-09-17 04:56:39 UTC --- Thank you, Wayne -- works great for me, too! I was delighted to find that a solution to my problem had so recently come into existence. =-) I'm curious why you don't think --unso

[Bug 7194] Getting --inplace and --sparse to work together (+patch)

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7194 David Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||davidt-samba-bugzilla@yadt.

[Bug 7194] Getting --inplace and --sparse to work together (+patch)

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7194 --- Comment #8 from David Taylor 2013-09-08 09:50:35 UTC --- Is there any update available on what's stopping this patch being merged? It would be very useful... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- Yo

[Bug 10092] Hang when remote dest's disk is full

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10092 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 10092] New: Hang when remote dest's disk is full

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10092 Summary: Hang when remote dest's disk is full Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >