https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10074
--- Comment #4 from Nicholas Andre 2013-08-14 20:59:17
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Created attachment 9130 [details]
> Add the --unsorted option
>
> This version of the patch also insures that a remote rsync gets told about the
> --unsorte
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10074
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #9124|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10081
Summary: Multiple rsync instances conflict
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P5
Component: co
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10074
--- Comment #2 from Wayne Davison 2013-08-12 06:00:04 UTC ---
Created attachment 9124
--> https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=9124
Add the --unsorted option
This patch adds the --unsorted option, slightly extending the
need_unsorted_fli
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10074
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Version|3.0.6
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10074
Summary: rsync reorders --from-files alphabetically
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.6
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8856
--- Comment #7 from awk 2013-08-08 17:44:36 UTC ---
Well, under FreeBSD linkat() will hardlink symlinks, i.e. instead of:
link(source, target);
use:
linkat(AT_FDCWD, source, AT_FDCWD, target, 0);
I patched my copy of rsync to use that and it wor
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8856
--- Comment #6 from Wayne Davison 2013-08-08 16:02:13 UTC ---
You should note that this bug is awaiting info that nobody has bothered to
provide. Nothing more is going to be done until someone figures out what is
needed.
--
Configure bugmail: htt
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8856
--- Comment #5 from awk 2013-08-07 06:55:08 UTC ---
Same behavior on:
FreeBSD 9.x ZFS (and UFS)
OmniOS (OpenSolaris) ZFS
In fact it often just hangs outright after the "No such file or directory"
error message.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugz
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10051
Summary: Improved long file-name handling
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: co
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10035
--- Comment #6 from Nestor Urquiza 2013-07-25
17:23:06 UTC ---
I set my script which uses rsync to run every hour. Last night I logged a snoop
result (tcp sniffer) but also a netstat result every minute. It failed two
ties:
00:15 RSYNC hags for t
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10035
--- Comment #5 from Nestor Urquiza 2013-07-24
15:19:38 UTC ---
Here are the errors for those instances when it failed last night BTW:
1. Note that I use a 30 minutes timeout. Here are two errors where the timeout
was reached
1.1 filexyz: connecti
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10035
--- Comment #4 from Nestor Urquiza 2013-07-24
15:02:19 UTC ---
Yesterday the script actually hanged 6 times from 11PM to 5AM so it is now
discarded this is anything related to specific commands running at any specific
time. The fact that I am runn
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10035
--- Comment #3 from Nestor Urquiza 2013-07-19
23:33:11 UTC ---
Now that I removed the -vvv switch rsync hangs only at 3AM. All Solaris 10
machines run around that time something. Here is the relevant information from
root cron:
10 3 * * * /usr/sb
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10035
--- Comment #2 from Nestor Urquiza 2013-07-19
21:29:37 UTC ---
More feedback. This can be replicated I believe using the - option better.
I have found the script fails way less when using just -v. So:
rsync -e ssh -avvvz -stats --delete-after
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10024
Andreas Krüger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|3.0.9 |3.1.0
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Krüger
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10024
--- Comment #1 from Wayne Davison 2013-07-19 16:00:05 UTC ---
Please test 3.1.0dev instead.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for t
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10035
--- Comment #1 from Nestor Urquiza 2013-07-19
14:31:17 UTC ---
More feedback on this. I run rsync from a wrapper script. See below what I get
running rsync with - option:
[sender] make_file(filename.rsl,*,2)
recv_file_name(filename.rsl)
rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10037
Summary: do_mknod fails to create socket file
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.9
Platform: All
OS/Version: Solaris
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Compo
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10035
Summary: rsync hangs in solaris
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.9
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: core
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10031
Summary: rsyncd resolves hosts stupidly
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.8
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: core
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9560
--- Comment #2 from Frits 2013-07-17 10:29:33 UTC ---
"me too"
yes , this would be usefull. Filling up memory with cache is not always
usefull.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10024
Summary: rsync cannot delete remote file, yet exit value is 0.
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.9
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995
--- Comment #2 from Wayne Davison 2013-07-12 19:39:28 UTC ---
FYI, the latest patch also narrows the fields from 256 to 128 chars, which
should be plenty.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are rec
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9997
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5478
--- Comment #33 from michaeljoya 2013-07-10 19:26:56
UTC ---
I got this error while creating a backup copy between two drives on the same
machine. It seems that most people on this list are wrongly attributing the
problem to differing rsync version
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9997
--- Comment #4 from Yongzhi Pan 2013-07-05 04:10:01 UTC
---
Rsync will process it, but it may not show it in the file list.
The manpage says:
At the single -v level of verbosity, this does not mention when a file gets its
attributes changed.
But
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9997
--- Comment #3 from Kevin Korb 2013-07-05 02:25:22 UTC
---
If it is showing a timestamp difference then rsync had to process that file.
If you were running with --whole-file then it actually did copy the file. If
you aren't then it verified the c
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9997
--- Comment #2 from Yongzhi Pan 2013-07-05 02:18:49 UTC
---
In the example '-i' would show 't' meaning its modification time has changed.
I want to suppress these file attributes changing info. According to the doc, a
single '-v' option should be
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9997
--- Comment #1 from Kevin Korb 2013-07-04 13:02:26 UTC
---
If you add --itemize-changes rsync will tell you what it is changing and why.
You can then filter the output however you want.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9997
Summary: File listed only whose attributes have changed for
single '-v' option
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.9
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severi
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995
Summary: Rsync 3.1 dev :
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.0
Platform: x64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: core
Assig
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9987
Summary: wishlist: add flag(s) to preserve *destination*
metadata (i.e. owner, group)
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8847
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #7435|0 |1
is patch|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9948
Devin Nate changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #8967|Log progress|rsync-3.0.9-log-progress.pa
description
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9948
Devin Nate changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #8967|0 |1
is patch|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9948
Summary: Patch to provide progress display in log file
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.9
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9915
--- Comment #1 from Alvin 2013-06-10 00:10:02 UTC ---
For the time being, we are sending small 1byte message periodically to "give a
push" to the "appeared to be hung" files over. This seems to work temporarily
and we are hopping to have a fix for t
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8265
--- Comment #11 from grarp...@gmail.com 2013-06-03 07:11:56 UTC ---
Way back then... I think I modified the patch a bit, ran against just a few
files in a dir, and reconfirmed it. The workproduct is still here somewhere...
a bet from memory says don'
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8265
--- Comment #10 from Wayne Davison 2013-06-02 23:42:21 UTC
---
Any more info on this?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8790
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8775
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9416
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8838
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8411
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8483
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8720
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8829
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9211
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9498
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9915
Summary: File stopped synchronizing during transmission
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.9
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P5
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9798
Vijay Nag changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9798
--- Comment #6 from Vijay Nag 2013-05-27 18:41:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I asked you to test the fix. Either grab the git version or the latest
> nightly
> tar file.
Tested ok.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userpr
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9798
--- Comment #5 from Wayne Davison 2013-05-27 18:35:56 UTC ---
I asked you to test the fix. Either grab the git version or the latest nightly
tar file.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiv
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9908
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9908
Summary: The report of the difference between the source and
the destination
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9798
--- Comment #4 from Vijay Nag 2013-05-27 01:28:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > I think rsync is not handling EILSEQ error returned by iconv(3).
>
> No, but it did expect an E2BIG in preference to an EILSEQ, which
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8666
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8751
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8856
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from Wayne Davison
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9103
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from Wayne Davison
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9427
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9657
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9670
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Summary|missing substru
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9770
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9798
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Wayne Davison
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9877
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #2 from Wayne Davison
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9882
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5478
--- Comment #32 from Scott Wood 2013-05-23 03:50:20
UTC ---
I tried the --no-ckecksum or --blocking-io, both to no avail. I now have an
admin at the other end of the connection onboard for troubleshooting. If/when
we find the cause, I'll update t
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5478
--- Comment #31 from Scott Wood 2013-05-23 02:21:10
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #30)
> Did you try with one of these options : --no-checksum --no-compress
> --blocking-io ?
>
> Just a check since you have a 4G limit : I suppose you're not rsync-i
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5478
--- Comment #30 from Loïc Gomez 2013-05-22 07:02:09
UTC ---
Did you try with one of these options : --no-checksum --no-compress
--blocking-io ?
Just a check since you have a 4G limit : I suppose you're not rsync-ing to a
FAT32 filesystem ?
--
Co
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5478
--- Comment #29 from Scott Wood 2013-05-22 06:05:43
UTC ---
As a follow up to my second question, we added the firewall rules to allow
SYN,RST,ACK,FIN and ACK traffic form the server in question and it did not
solve the problem.
--
Configure bugm
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5478
Scott Wood changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||woodystr...@hotmail.com
--- Comment #28 from S
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9894
--- Comment #2 from Ankur Mishra 2013-05-20 12:41:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Rsync marks a file with a read error with a checksum that doesn't match the
> file content so that the receiver knows that the file it generated is not
> valid.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9749
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9660
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from Wayne Davison
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9789
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9860
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8838
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from Wayne Davison
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9894
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9894
Summary: Rsync can silently zero out chunks in a file
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.9
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
Priority: P5
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9882
Summary: Incorrect exit code when sender over SSH is killed
with SIGTERM
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9783
--- Comment #4 from Kilian CAVALOTTI
2013-05-13 12:46:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > what result does remote scp vs local-copy-on-sshfs give (i.e what is the
> > impact
> > of sshfs) ?
>
> They are the comparab
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8838
--- Comment #6 from Chris Dunlop 2013-05-13 07:00:07 UTC
---
Apologies, my previous comment was a bit misleading. I meant that I would also
have expected --protect-args to fix the problem you've identified, however, if
the intention is to not affec
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9877
--- Comment #1 from Jack Savage 2013-05-10 21:01:57 UTC ---
I meant to include this information in the original post.
[oracle@rh5-appsrvr99 oracle > cat /etc/redhat-release
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.7 (Tikanga)
[oracle@rh5-appsrvr99
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9877
Summary: target file deleted in error
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.6
Platform: x64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: core
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8838
--- Comment #5 from mlus...@redhat.com 2013-05-10 09:50:58 UTC ---
Created attachment 8876
--> https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=8876
New version of patch preserving historical usage
Attached patch enables transmission of files into dir
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9864
--- Comment #1 from roland 2013-05-07 20:10:20 UTC ---
http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2006-November/016822.html
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=rsync-patches.git;a=blob;f=source-filter_dest-filter.diff;h=7de358b9c4e567191aa11759822f6fd0c54d307b;hb
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9864
Summary: Allow permanent compression of destination files
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9860
--- Comment #3 from Роман Донченко 2013-05-06 18:08:37
UTC ---
Created attachment 8854
--> https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=8854
This patch isn't required - it just removes a lot of warnings when building for
Android
--
Configure bu
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9860
--- Comment #2 from Роман Донченко 2013-05-06 18:07:24
UTC ---
Created attachment 8853
--> https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=8853
Android doesn't have getpass.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9860
--- Comment #1 from Роман Донченко 2013-05-06 18:06:50
UTC ---
Created attachment 8852
--> https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=8852
Android doesn't have S_IEXEC
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
-
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9860
Summary: Fix Android build
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: Other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: core
Ass
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8838
--- Comment #4 from Chris Dunlop 2013-05-06 03:54:58 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Thank you Chris. I have not been aware about this rsync feature. I am getting
> the same result when I try to transmit mentioned file with --protect-args.
> Sho
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9783
--- Comment #3 from Kilian CAVALOTTI
2013-05-03 20:12:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> what result does remote scp vs local-copy-on-sshfs give (i.e what is the
> impact
> of sshfs) ?
They are the comparable, the impact of sshfs is minimal. I
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9783
--- Comment #2 from roland 2013-05-03 18:31:50 UTC ---
what result does remote scp vs local-copy-on-sshfs give (i.e what is the impact
of sshfs) ?
if that gives similar performance, your comparison is proably somewhat valid -
otherwise you comparing
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8838
--- Comment #3 from mlus...@redhat.com 2013-05-03 14:01:08 UTC ---
Thank you Chris. I have not been aware about this rsync feature. I am getting
the same result when I try to transmit mentioned file with --protect-args.
Shouldn't this be working with
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9783
--- Comment #1 from Kilian CAVALOTTI
2013-05-02 14:48:00 UTC ---
One way to easily reproduce this problem is to try to transfer a single large
file using rsync:
a. over ssh:
rsync -av host0:/path/to/file /tmp/file
b. locally, by mounting the r
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8566
--- Comment #11 from Stefan Nowak 2013-05-02 10:27:05 UTC ---
Apple Developer Bug Reporting Team replied today:
Engineering has determined that this issue behaves as intended based on the
following information:
Comments are stored primarily in the
901 - 1000 of 4233 matches
Mail list logo