On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 11:04:25PM -0700, travis+ml-rs...@subspacefield.org
wrote:
> Could a dangling symlink cause this problem?
To answer my own question, yes, a dangling symlink on the source was
the cause of the problem, and I had --copy-unsafe-symlinks is on.
Thanks for the help people, tha
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 11:44:45AM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
> On Tue 05 Apr 2011, travis+ml-rs...@subspacefield.org wrote:
> > Anyone know what this is supposed to mean?
> >
> > 366305 files to consider
> > IO error encountered -- skipping file deletion
> >
> > I keep getting this, and so it r
Anyone know what this is supposed to mean?
366305 files to consider
IO error encountered -- skipping file deletion
I keep getting this, and so it refuses to delete any files from a mirror.
But what is the supposed I/O error?
Can we have it give us some kind of clue?
dmesg doesn't show any clue
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 07:00:57PM -0800, travis+ml-rs...@subspacefield.org
wrote:
> This time it failed when trying to delete a file containing the word
> G\#303\#266del
>
> I wonder if there's some issues with Unicode...
Or possibly not. This time, the last line before the I/O error was a
fi
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 06:41:26PM -0800, travis+ml-rs...@subspacefield.org
wrote:
> deleting path/to/(Something) Word Word Anotherword--Word Word.pdf
> IO error encountered -- skipping file deletion
>
> I think either the -- is causing it to fail, or more likely, the next
> filename, which it di
1)
deleting path/to/(Something) Word Word Anotherword--Word Word.pdf
IO error encountered -- skipping file deletion
I think either the -- is causing it to fail, or more likely, the next
filename, which it didn't bother to print out, which has an ampersand
in the name, causes it to fail.
I am usi
Oh, and if it buffers requests sent to its STDIN, that's fine.
To actually complete requests in parallel, you'd need a multithread or
multiprocess app, and that's complicated.
The proper term for what I'm suggesting is probably "pipelining".
--
Travis is an organic computer peripheral.
My emails
Just curious if the protocol sends a request and waits for a response,
or whether it can multiplex multiple requests on a single connection.
This could improve performance over high latency links, if a lot of
time is spent waiting for the response (i.e. when the hashes match).
--
Travis is an orga
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 01:32:42PM -0400, Brian Cuttler wrote:
[Set u+s on directories, don't worry about owners]
It seems to work relatively well. I get an error about not being
able to chgrp the files owned by other users, and, in my case,
the group ends up wrong because it's not supposed to be
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 01:34:44PM -0400, Brian Cuttler wrote:
> As a matter of principle, SOP, we don't like to ssh/rsync as root
> and generally don't allow root ssh/rsync into a box. Better/safer
> to move the security stuff to a lower powered user if you can.
I'm familiar with the argument. L
I often push files from my user account over SSH to my web server, and
want them owned by www-user, which may not have a login shell, should
never accept remote logins, and who may not have a ~/.ssh directory
(and if it did, it would be under the wwwroot, ack!).
Currently I push as root and then d
Hey all, I'm writing a tool:
http://www.subspacefield.org/security/hdb/
It is very similar in some ways to rsync, except it's meant for backing up
locally to removable HDDs, and it keeps metadata around when the HDD is
removed.
I figured I'd ping people here to see if they are interested in
part
12 matches
Mail list logo
